search for: bulin

...rectory is small, it contains only one file. stat() takes 15ms and if I read 1000 files it sums to 15 seconds. So the issue is really that open file is synchronous. On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 9:57 PM, Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 09:44:57PM +0200, Peter Bulin wrote: > > Hi, > > I need to to open existing readonly files. Yes you are right, not the > open > > call takes the time, but stat() system call. > > I looked at aio_pthread source, the lines which needs to be removed to > make > > it work are just the lines which...

The strange thing is that I cloned this server from another server, and the original server does not have the "wbinfo -u" problem. Both servers have the exact same configurations.. Thanks. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Bulin" <bulin.peter at gmail.com> To: dxu at uoguelph.ca Cc: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2016 11:24:55 AM Subject: Re: [Samba] wbinfo -u and -g gives no output I had the same problem, for me setting : *"client ldap sasl wrapping = p...

I have Samba 4.2 on Redhat 7. "wbinfo -u" and "wbinfo -g" commands give no output and no error. I can authenticate using "wbinfo -a username". Anyone knows what could be the problem? Thanks.

...g of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. Please consider the environment and only print this if required. > Am 27.04.2016 um 17:24 schrieb Peter Bulin <bulin.peter at gmail.com>: > > I had the same problem, for me setting : *"client ldap sasl wrapping = > plain" *helped. > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Dennis Xu <dxu at uoguelph.ca> wrote: > >> I have Samba 4.2 on Redhat 7. "wbinfo -u&quo...

...nswer. On the server side samba is processing this requests in a synchronous way, in order which they were send, that is what I see from strace output. On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 8:31 AM, Volker Lendecke <Volker.Lendecke at sernet.de> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 10:08:41PM +0200, Peter Bulin wrote: > > The directory is small, it contains only one file. stat() takes 15ms and > if > > I read 1000 files it sums to 15 seconds. So the issue is really that open > > file is synchronous. > > What do you exactly mean by "open file is synchronous"? At which l...

...ce, the lines which needs to be removed to make it work are just the lines which tests for O_CREAT|O_EXCL? What problems can cause such solution for readonly share? On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 8:42 PM, Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 03:49:44PM +0200, Peter Bulin wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have problem with my samba. I have shared folder which contains many > > smaller files (few MB each), this files are stored on very fast disk > array. > > Locally, from that machine I can read this files in parallel with speed > > abou...

Hi, I have problem with my samba. I have shared folder which contains many smaller files (few MB each), this files are stored on very fast disk array. Locally, from that machine I can read this files in parallel with speed about 500-1000 MB/s, but when I read them through samba, I get only 50-100 MB/s on a 10 gigabit network. I tried to find the problem, so I analyzed strace logs and found out,

...UND Any idea what is wrong? And if stat() is the problem, could SMB_VFS_STAT be implemented in vfs_aio_pthread module the same way SMB_VFS_OPEN is implemented? On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 6:49 PM, Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 01:02:54PM +0200, Peter Bulin wrote: > > Hi, > > I did use wireshark to verify that the client (window7) is not the > problem, > > client is sending out multiple "SMB2 Create request" packets before he > gets > > some answer. > > On the server side samba is processing this requests...

On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 03:49:44PM +0200, Peter Bulin wrote: > Hi, > > I have problem with my samba. I have shared folder which contains many > smaller files (few MB each), this files are stored on very fast disk array. > Locally, from that machine I can read this files in parallel with speed > about 500-1000 MB/s, but when I read t...