Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "builld".
Did you mean:
build
2018 May 06
1
Slow IR compilation/JIT, profiling points to LLVM?
...:21, Andres Freund wrote:
> That's what I do (using Orc to JIT parts of SQL queries). By default I
> have the debug build of postgres linked against debug LLVM w/
> assertions, and the optimized build against an optimized LLVM wo/
> assertions (albeit with symbols).
I've tried a builld with assertions off and it has only a relatively
minor impact (a 10% drop in time spent in LLVM). The instruction cound
for `findAnalysisPass` is gone, but the things like `AddInteger` are
still called millions of times.
Given the number of IR instructions (at most 65K since a 65K IR file),
the mi...
2011 Jan 19
1
How to build Theora decoder on VC++ paltform
...ttp://www.xiph.org/
> ,
> here its having both encoder and decoder , how can i build only
> decoder on VC + windows platform , if i build now i will be getting "
> Cannot open include file: 'ogg/ogg.h': No such file or directory "
> pls send me solution for htis to builld and run this code and what are
> test vectors i can use for this decoder
>
Hi Raju,
libtheora has libogg as dependency and for the encoder_example also
libvorbis.
Here are the steps to compile libtheora, dump_video, and encoder_example:
1. Download libogg-1.2.2.zip
<http://downloads.xip...
2006 Aug 01
2
A problem with R CMD SHLIB
Hi,
I followed the example in "Writing R Extensions" to create a shared
object in Windows, using the command
R CMD SHLIB X.cc X_main.cc
This was encountered:
../src/gnuwin32/MkRules:155: warning: overriding commands for target
'.c.d'
../src/gnuwin32/MkRules:143: warning: ignoring old commands for target
'.c.d'
../src/gnuwin32/MkRules:171: warning: overriding commands
2018 May 05
2
Slow IR compilation/JIT, profiling points to LLVM?
On 05/05/18 17:58, Andres Freund wrote:
> You're building LLVM with assertions enabled
> (-DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=ON).
> Some of those are fairly expensive...
>
Is there another way to get LLVM to check the correctness of my IR
without the assertions? That's what I'm assuming I need the flag for
(it's been a long time since I experimented with it)
If there is no way
2018 May 05
0
Slow IR compilation/JIT, profiling points to LLVM?
Hi,
On 2018-05-06 00:19:42 +0200, edA-qa mort-ora-y wrote:
> On 05/05/18 17:58, Andres Freund wrote:
> > You're building LLVM with assertions enabled
> > (-DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=ON).
> > Some of those are fairly expensive...
> >
>
> Is there another way to get LLVM to check the correctness of my IR
> without the assertions? That's what I'm