search for: buildrectyp

Hi all, http://www.llvm.org/docs/ProgrammersManual.html#BuildRecType suggests us to define recursive types via opaque and refine. Since LLVM has structural types, %rt = type { %rt* } and %rt1 = type { %rt* } should be same structurally. I tested the following code, %rt = type { %rt* } %rt1 = type { %rt* } define i32 @main() nounwind { entry: %0 = alloca %rt...

...or a type that isn't completely > known yet -- or is thet avoided by having a type 'pointer' instead > of 'poimter-to-foo'? Partially opaque types can be refined. This section of the programmer's manual is applicable: http://llvm.org/docs/ProgrammersManual.html#BuildRecType — Gordon

On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 8:28 AM, Jianzhou Zhao <jianzhou at seas.upenn.edu> wrote: > Hi all, > > http://www.llvm.org/docs/ProgrammersManual.html#BuildRecType suggests > us to define recursive types via opaque and refine. Since LLVM has > structural types, %rt = type { %rt* } and %rt1 = type { %rt* } should > be same structurally. I tested the following code, > > %rt = type { %rt* } > %rt1 = type { %rt* } > > define i32 @main() n...

>> >> I think I may have found an exception to this -- the API seems to >> require me to have all the fields for a struct ready before I >> construct the struct. I don't have the ability to make a struct >> type, use it to declare some variables, and still contribute fields >> to it during the rest of the compilation. >> >> Is there a

Hi, I've followed the instructions on constructing recursive types ( http://llvm.org/docs/ProgrammersManual.html#BuildRecType) and I can succesfully create simple recursive types using the C bindings (e.g. struct Test { struct Test *t };). I want to generalize this to get type information from my language into generated LLVM code. My language allows arbitrary forward type declarations that I resolve using two passes - fi...

...y sort of >> data structure. > > On it already. BTW, where can I find a good example of how to use it? To close the loop with C++ syntax, LLVMTypeHandleRef is really a pointer to a heap-allocated PATypeHolder, which is discussed here: http://llvm.org/docs/ProgrammersManual.html#BuildRecType The file test/Bindings/Ocaml/vmcore.ml contains this fragment: (* RUN: grep -v {RecursiveTy.*RecursiveTy} < %t.ll *) let ty = opaque_type () in let th = handle_to_type ty in refine_type ty (pointer_type ty); let ty = type_of_handle th in insist (define_type_name "Re...

On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 16:05:19 -0400, Gordon Henriksen wrote: > > Partially opaque types can be refined. This section of the programmer's > manual is applicable: > > http://llvm.org/docs/ProgrammersManual.html#BuildRecType > > — Gordon Here it is: : // Create the initial outer struct : PATypeHolder StructTy = OpaqueType::get(); : std::vector<const Type*> Elts; : Elts.push_back(PointerType::get(StructTy)); : Elts.push_back(Type::Int32Ty); : StructType *NewSTy = StructType::get(Elts); Here NewSTy is a...

...il all refineAbstractTypeTo()'s are done. -- James On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 5:20 AM, James Williams <junk at giantblob.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I've followed the instructions on constructing recursive types ( >> http://llvm.org/docs/ProgrammersManual.html#BuildRecType) and I can >> succesfully create simple recursive types using the C bindings (e.g. struct >> Test { struct Test *t };). I want to generalize this to get type information >> from my language into generated LLVM code. My language allows arbitrary >> forward type declarations...

Hi Gordon, Thanks for your comments. > > Constant.string(value, dont_null_terminate) -- value is a string > > Constant.struct(consts, packed) -- a struct, consts is a list of > > other constants, packed is boolean > > I did this in Ocaml initially, but found the boolean constants pretty > confusing to read in code. I kept asking "What's that random true