search for: buildins

And dont forget : https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Idmap_config_ad I also noticed and incorrect mapping, which "looks" like rights issues like in the thead here. ( it is imo not a right issue.. ) read on.. NTDOMAIN\enterprise read-only domain controllers:x:3000202: NTDOMAIN\domain admins:x:10001:NTDOMAIN\administrator NTDOMAIN\domain users:x:10000: NTDOMAIN\domain guests:x:10002:

On 22/06/16 13:44, lingpanda101 at gmail.com wrote: > On 6/22/2016 8:19 AM, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: >> And dont forget : >> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Idmap_config_ad >> >> I also noticed and incorrect mapping, which "looks" like rights >> issues like in the thead here. ( it is imo not a right issue.. ) read >> on.. >> >>

On Thu, 10 Aug 2017 12:19:36 +0200 "L.P.H. van Belle via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hai Mathias, > > Type: wbinfo --all-domains > > You should see 3 domainnames. > > BUILTIN => idmap config * > HOSTNAME => ? Dont know where this one maps to. > NTDOM => idmap config NTDOM On a Unix domain member, I get 4 BUILTIN

Hi all, What is the real purpose if the following lines when using idmap-rid or idmap-ad: # Default idmap config for local BUILTIN accounts and groups idmap config * : backend = tdb idmap config * : range = 3000-7999 When using the next two lines # idmap config for the SAMDOM domain idmap config SAMDOM : backend = rid [or ad] idmap config SAMDOM : range = 10000-999999 AD users will be in

On 6/22/2016 8:19 AM, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: > And dont forget : > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Idmap_config_ad > > I also noticed and incorrect mapping, which "looks" like rights issues like in the thead here. ( it is imo not a right issue.. ) read on.. > > NTDOMAIN\enterprise read-only domain controllers:x:3000202: > NTDOMAIN\domain

On 22/06/16 10:13, mj wrote: > > > On 06/21/2016 04:48 PM, lingpanda101 at gmail.com wrote: >> >> I found my issue. On one of my DC's I had misspelled 'idmap_ldb:use >> rfc2307 = Yes'. I had it 'idmap_lbd:'. Ran 'net cache flush' and wbinfo >> gave correct mappings. I find it odd that 'samba-tool testparm' never >> threw

And what i dont see,, what is your "current" smb.conf ? Greetz. Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > lingpanda101 at gmail.com > Verzonden: woensdag 22 juni 2016 15:09 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Rights issue on GPO > > On 6/22/2016 8:51 AM, Rowland penny wrote:

> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Rowland Penny via > samba > > So you fixed it and not disable-ing it. ..... > > No, he borked it. Yeah, my typos.. :-( thats what i meant.. > > > > > You system used id range 0-1000+ ( and first user gets 1000 ) > > The Windows | BUILDIN matches : idmap

> > Two things Louis: > > if you look very closely at the differences in the 'ERROR' message, you > will find the only difference is this: > > O:LAG:DAD:PAR( > > against the expected: > > O:DAG:DAD:PAR( > > The returned ACL is owned by the 'Local Admins', but it should be owned > by 'Domain Admins'. As far as I can see,

Maybe is not what you want, but don't you crosscompile it for PPC, using toolchains in your desktop computer? It's suppose to be faster.

*Top 10 Buildings of the world<http://www.awpedia.com/newstuff/highest-building/> Tuffest, largest, highest, underwater and underground buildings * <http://www.awpedia.com/newstuff/highest-building/> [image: Top 10 Records] <http://www.awpedia.com/newstuff/highest-building/> World Most Tuff Building Earthquake Proove buildings American Steel Buildings Allied steel building The

>> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Idmap_config_ad Dont we need idmap config in the smb.conf also, or is above not used anymore, if so the we must change the wiki. Gr. Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > lingpanda101 at gmail.com > Verzonden: woensdag 22 juni 2016 15:37 > Aan: samba at

Hi My next try is to create the group myself, but the point here was that the Builtin group created by the provisioning of Samba, doesn't work... /Martin ----- Original meddelelse ----- Fra: "L.P.H. van Belle" <belle at bazuin.nl> Til: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> Sendt: onsdag, 2. marts 2016 16:55:41 Emne: Re: [Samba] Remote Desktop Users Group not

Hello, I have the following message posted on the linux.samba newsgroup, but so far no response. Therefore I try again in this group, hoping that there are other people reading this group, and yes, that hopefully somebody can help me with my samba winbind problems. John Knappers Hello, "John" <jknappers@nospam.hotmail.com> schreef in bericht

Hai Mathias, Type: wbinfo --all-domains You should see 3 domainnames. BUILTIN => idmap config * HOSTNAME => ? Dont know where this one maps to. NTDOM => idmap config NTDOM I use for example ( for debian ) the following. I use this as followed. ## map id's outside to NT domain to tdb files. idmap config *: backend = tdb idmap config *: range = 2000-2999 ##

Hi I have setup a Samba AD and connected a Windows 7 machine to the AD... I'm having problems getting the Remote Desktop Users group to work... [root at bart private]# samba-tool group addmembers "Remote Desktop Users" mj ldb_wrap open of secrets.ldb Added members to group Remote Desktop Users [root at bart private]# samba-tool group listmembers "Remote Desktop

Hai, In reponse to the why i recommend that. Since this is a "windows" only share, i recomment to set it up for that usage, with results in better matching for windows rights. Resulting in better working policies. The current POSIX rights did not match to my needs and resulted in inconsistant policies. This is why i use these for profiles and sysvol. And this is my setup order:

Hai, the steps are (basily) good, only this one can be better.   >To solve, I executed the following commands: >Chown 10060: 30028 -R sysvol >Chmod 775 -R sysvol   If you use acl_xattr:ignore system acls = yes on the sysvol share, you must configur the share from withing windows.  (* or use smbcalcs , but i never used it. )   This is what i see:   ls -al  sysvol total 24 drwxrwx---+ 3

A good howto per exampl.e http://www.itingredients.com/how-to-disable-usb-ports-using-group-policy/ Only i did not do this as computer policy but as user policy. In short, 1) create 2 groups: USB-Allowed USB-Denied 2) create 2 policies objects, USB-Allowed USB-Denied And set in the allow polices ( as shown in the link but under the user polcies ) 3) add correct group to the same

Hai, You must have mist something.. I did it as followed in the GPO settings. I created a "DOMAIN\Allow-RDP" group in the AD. Added users to this group. In the GPO, i used "default computer" Policies - Windows settings - security settings - Restricted groups. Here add your DOMAIN\Allow-RDP to the Remote Desktop Users. And - Windows settings - security settings