search for: buildinfo

Hi, I see that for EL6 gwd already has pushed a libvirtd package with version 1.2.10[1]. I got request from VDSM development to provide libvirt >= 1.2.9 for EL7 for oVirt 3.6. gwd, do you just rebuilt http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=594825 ? I'm looking at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=628689 may this work for you? [1] http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=251 -- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com

...parately, my advise is to use Gtk etc instead. - caml_named_value returns a const pointer. While this is correct, it also broke a couple of our packages and will require upstream fixes. - RISC-V support should be in better shape. Rich. ocaml-tplib https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1420345 ocaml-p3l https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1420339 libguestfs https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1420315 ocaml-camlimages https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1420324 ocaml-augeas https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?...

I have rpm sources for centos-release-docker at https://github.com/CentOS-virt7/centos-release-docker Some updated packages available on centos-docker-common-testing branch are: docker: http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=9932 atomic: http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=10046 docker-distribution: http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=9950 I think I need to have the docker testing packages available on buildlogs.c.o. That's probably a task for kb, arrfab? Let me know what next. -- Lokes...

Hi Marius, Will make the changes and see how it goes. On the other hand https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=27138 if the above was released we could just install and migrate to rh-php73-php, which is not affected as per https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2019-11043 thanks --- Thomas Stephen Lee On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 8:40 PM Marius ROMAN <marius at roman.systems> wrote: >...

...ild an debian package from svn. First I checked out trunk and the 2.3.2 branch, which both build this quite "old" package :-) icecast2_1.9+2.0alphasnap2+20030802-1_amd64.deb Then I tried the kh branch, which doesn't build with dpkg-buildpackage: debian/rules:6: debian/cdbs/1/rules/buildinfo.mk: No such file or directory make: *** No rule to make target `debian/cdbs/1/rules/buildinfo.mk'. Stop. dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules clean gave error exit status 2 after I have removed the line from debian/rules, it starts compiling, but throws an error: make[4]: Leaving directo...

...similar.. > > > > Good memory! I'd forgotten about that despite being the one who ran > > into it. > > > > Looks like that patch was just removed in 4.9.75-30 which I just > > upgraded > > this system to: http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=21122 > > <http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=21122> > > Previously I was on 4.9.63-29 which does not have this problem, and does > > have the ldisc patch. So I guess the question is for Johnny, why was it > > removed? > > >...

...virt-sig kernel aswell? > > > > Call trace looks similar.. > > Good memory! I'd forgotten about that despite being the one who ran into > it. > > Looks like that patch was just removed in 4.9.75-30 which I just upgraded > this system to: http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=21122 > Previously I was on 4.9.63-29 which does not have this problem, and does > have the ldisc patch. So I guess the question is for Johnny, why was it > removed? > > In the meantime, I'll revert the kernel and follow up if I see any further > problems. > > II...

...are > stripped, which isn't right. Does anyone know how to fix this? How are you building? CentOS builds with mock, but I'm not super familiar with the environment. rpmbuild -b doesn't seem to always work that well. Here's info from the last build: http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=17331 http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=17330 > I'm also not sure how you're supposed to build the kernel-firmware package with the current spec file definition. I'm also not sure about how the firmware builds work but here's the Koji builds from the last upd...

...guestfs tries any inspection-related operation: aug_init: Augeas initialization failed The bug and explanation is here (thanks Dominic Cleal): https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894241#c11 This bug is fixed in the following packages: Fedora 17: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=379590 [*] Fedora 18: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=378954 Rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=379391 [*] [*] = at time of writing, still building Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjone...

Is there any problem moving to 4.9.31? This contains upstream commits f2e767bb5d6ee0d9 for mpt3sas and 69861e0a52f87333 for dom0 memory mappings. I am also trying to build a debuginfo package but it's not correct. Specifically I'm able to get vmlinux but the .debug files for modules are stripped, which isn't right. Does anyone know how to fix this? I'm also not sure how

...while the file references beta: puppet agent --test --noop --environment=beta info: Retrieving plugin info: Loading facts in hcs_service info: Loading facts in os_version info: Loading facts in memorysize info: Loading facts in uspspuppetfacts info: Loading facts in network info: Loading facts in buildinfo info: Loading facts in hcs_service info: Loading facts in os_version info: Loading facts in memorysize info: Loading facts in uspspuppetfacts info: Loading facts in network info: Loading facts in buildinfo pcilib: Cannot open /proc/bus/pci lspci: Cannot find any working access method. info: Caching...

What would you recommend: ansible is in EPEL8 and ConfigSIG. For the latter I do not see any sources in git.centos.org. Where they come from? I wonder with which repository I should use (long term)? dnf not checking gpg signature sounds scary: https://github.com/ansible/ansible/blob/v2.9.13/changelogs/CHANGELOG-v2.9.rst#security-fixes -- Leon

...& thaw BROKEN >> ALL Kernels - vesa(fb) resume & thaw BROKEN. >> >> > > Excusez-moi, > BROKEN == The display remains OFF. > More precisely stated it looks like this: - Last kernel with working resume/thaw http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=538208 kernel-3.16.0-0.rc0.git9.1.fc21 2014-06-13 - First kernel with broken resume/thaw kernel-3.16.0-0.rc0.git10.1.fc21 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=538244 http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/repo/pkgs/kernel/patch-3.15-git10.xz/f98fb42e79c966f8e139e27b61d933e...

...;) > > Thanks for providing those test binaries so quickly. > > The x64 package is missing DLLs. remote-viewer works fine, but: > > virsh.exe complains about missing libvirt-lcx-0.dll and doesn't starts. You should be able to grab it from http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=460929 even though I don't think it's really useful to build that at all on mingw. > virt-viewer.exe complains about missing libssp-0.dll and doesn't > starts -- this also happens with the "current" binaries from > spice.org Not that surprising as the goal...

On 03/03/16 16:23, Lokesh Mandvekar wrote: > > I have rpm sources for centos-release-docker at > https://github.com/CentOS-virt7/centos-release-docker > > Some updated packages available on centos-docker-common-testing branch are: > docker: http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=9932 > atomic: http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=10046 > docker-distribution: http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=9950 > > I think I need to have the docker testing packages available on > buildlogs.c.o. That's probably a task for kb, arrfab? Let me...

> Please go download -8 and test it. Sorry to be ignorant but how do I do that in EL6? Thanks!

...body ever got eaccelerator working with open_basedir on CentOS? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751569 i wonder that the last build is more than a yaer ago and nobody hitted until now or nobody is secring his vhsost and so did not take notice about it http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=181336 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 262 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20111106/5c799153/attachment.sig>

Hi all, I'm looking for a fix in postgis, which seems to be fixed already in postgis-2.0.7-2.el7. However that package seems to be 'stuck' in the epel7-testing repository: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=750618 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-b6c229157e Is there a reason that the package is not pushed to stable yet? Or can it be pushed to stable? -- Kind regards, Danny

...memory! I'd forgotten about that despite being the one who ran > >>> into it. > >>> > >>> Looks like that patch was just removed in 4.9.75-30 which I just > >>> upgraded > >>> this system to: http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=21122 > >>> <http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=21122> > >>> Previously I was on 4.9.63-29 which does not have this problem, and > does > >>> have the ldisc patch. So I guess the question is for Johnny, why was it > >&...

...10 Checksums-Sha1: 619c126c771e3c1337decea91f037d404a3a8e5c 1827 mgcv_1.8-32-1.dsc 4f87f2900c1092b0a2eda5a37737fd19047f72e9 1004383 mgcv_1.8-32.orig.tar.gz 59f093b52f8e7a1d1a36d919d3bdb6e2ad3b0846 5288 mgcv_1.8-32-1.debian.tar.xz 8e09118b723d73c0abe987f6c7d2e83fac0f55c2 8551 mgcv_1.8-32-1_amd64.buildinfo Checksums-Sha256: ddc3ee3d75f875baf42f6ab54bbda228be3bdf419af283779f282f658cb5c93b 1827 mgcv_1.8-32-1.dsc 6ff5d1d43a3ecbb1b772b57c06dc9b386c9cd698d032138c19f3bd3ab9a5a9a0 1004383 mgcv_1.8-32.orig.tar.gz d6d0c8de54826abda31b1916539d52f60360a459b3c43ef092e86594813576d0 5288 mgcv_1.8-32-1.debian...