search for: buildid

Hi, I see that for EL6 gwd already has pushed a libvirtd package with version 1.2.10[1]. I got request from VDSM development to provide libvirt >= 1.2.9 for EL7 for oVirt 3.6. gwd, do you just rebuilt http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=594825 ? I'm looking at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=628689 may this work for you? [1] http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=251 -- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com

...my advise is to use Gtk etc instead. - caml_named_value returns a const pointer. While this is correct, it also broke a couple of our packages and will require upstream fixes. - RISC-V support should be in better shape. Rich. ocaml-tplib https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1420345 ocaml-p3l https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1420339 libguestfs https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1420315 ocaml-camlimages https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1420324 ocaml-augeas https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=...

I have rpm sources for centos-release-docker at https://github.com/CentOS-virt7/centos-release-docker Some updated packages available on centos-docker-common-testing branch are: docker: http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=9932 atomic: http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=10046 docker-distribution: http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=9950 I think I need to have the docker testing packages available on buildlogs.c.o. That's probably a task for kb, arrfab? Let me know what next. -- Lokesh Freeno...

Hi Marius, Will make the changes and see how it goes. On the other hand https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=27138 if the above was released we could just install and migrate to rh-php73-php, which is not affected as per https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2019-11043 thanks --- Thomas Stephen Lee On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 8:40 PM Marius ROMAN <marius at roman.systems> wrote: > On 10/31...

...> > > > Good memory! I'd forgotten about that despite being the one who ran > > into it. > > > > Looks like that patch was just removed in 4.9.75-30 which I just > > upgraded > > this system to: http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=21122 > > <http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=21122> > > Previously I was on 4.9.63-29 which does not have this problem, and does > > have the ldisc patch. So I guess the question is for Johnny, why was it > > removed? > > > >...

...kernel aswell? > > > > Call trace looks similar.. > > Good memory! I'd forgotten about that despite being the one who ran into > it. > > Looks like that patch was just removed in 4.9.75-30 which I just upgraded > this system to: http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=21122 > Previously I was on 4.9.63-29 which does not have this problem, and does > have the ldisc patch. So I guess the question is for Johnny, why was it > removed? > > In the meantime, I'll revert the kernel and follow up if I see any further > problems. > > IIRC the p...

...tripped, which isn't right. Does anyone know how to fix this? How are you building? CentOS builds with mock, but I'm not super familiar with the environment. rpmbuild -b doesn't seem to always work that well. Here's info from the last build: http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=17331 http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=17330 > I'm also not sure how you're supposed to build the kernel-firmware package with the current spec file definition. I'm also not sure about how the firmware builds work but here's the Koji builds from the last update: ht...

...ies any inspection-related operation: aug_init: Augeas initialization failed The bug and explanation is here (thanks Dominic Cleal): https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894241#c11 This bug is fixed in the following packages: Fedora 17: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=379590 [*] Fedora 18: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=378954 Rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=379391 [*] [*] = at time of writing, still building Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones virt-p...

...is a seasoned Centos kernel builder (though they work with different FC kernels), and now they are mostly done for the day. I have been following the wiki on building a custom kernel, got my patch in ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES and away with the rpmbuild. That failed on line 69: Unknown tag: % define buildid .hipl0809111 But the comments say to set the define to something like ".local" or ".bz123456" So why the failure? Too long our are the quotes required? If this works, I would like to see this patch 'mainstreamed' as it is in the 2.6.27 kernel....

Is there any problem moving to 4.9.31? This contains upstream commits f2e767bb5d6ee0d9 for mpt3sas and 69861e0a52f87333 for dom0 memory mappings. I am also trying to build a debuginfo package but it's not correct. Specifically I'm able to get vmlinux but the .debug files for modules are stripped, which isn't right. Does anyone know how to fix this? I'm also not sure how

What would you recommend: ansible is in EPEL8 and ConfigSIG. For the latter I do not see any sources in git.centos.org. Where they come from? I wonder with which repository I should use (long term)? dnf not checking gpg signature sounds scary: https://github.com/ansible/ansible/blob/v2.9.13/changelogs/CHANGELOG-v2.9.rst#security-fixes -- Leon

...BROKEN >> ALL Kernels - vesa(fb) resume & thaw BROKEN. >> >> > > Excusez-moi, > BROKEN == The display remains OFF. > More precisely stated it looks like this: - Last kernel with working resume/thaw http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=538208 kernel-3.16.0-0.rc0.git9.1.fc21 2014-06-13 - First kernel with broken resume/thaw kernel-3.16.0-0.rc0.git10.1.fc21 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=538244 http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/repo/pkgs/kernel/patch-3.15-git10.xz/f98fb42e79c966f8e139e27b61d933e0/patch-...

...gt; Thanks for providing those test binaries so quickly. > > The x64 package is missing DLLs. remote-viewer works fine, but: > > virsh.exe complains about missing libvirt-lcx-0.dll and doesn't starts. You should be able to grab it from http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=460929 even though I don't think it's really useful to build that at all on mingw. > virt-viewer.exe complains about missing libssp-0.dll and doesn't > starts -- this also happens with the "current" binaries from > spice.org Not that surprising as the goal of this...

Hi, I'm trying to build extlinux statically, but no matter what CFLAGS or OPTFLAGS I set in the Makefiles I get bios/extlinux/extlinux: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.24, BuildID[sha1]=ef970f59a48b226b2397b73a56e02a73b79c5f0a, not stripped I have tried adding OPTFLAGS= -static to the extlinux/Makefile as well as linux/Makefile but I'm obviously missing something. What flags do I need, and where? Thanks, Adam

On 03/03/16 16:23, Lokesh Mandvekar wrote: > > I have rpm sources for centos-release-docker at > https://github.com/CentOS-virt7/centos-release-docker > > Some updated packages available on centos-docker-common-testing branch are: > docker: http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=9932 > atomic: http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=10046 > docker-distribution: http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=9950 > > I think I need to have the docker testing packages available on > buildlogs.c.o. That's probably a task for kb, arrfab? Let me look thr...

> Please go download -8 and test it. Sorry to be ignorant but how do I do that in EL6? Thanks!

...got eaccelerator working with open_basedir on CentOS? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751569 i wonder that the last build is more than a yaer ago and nobody hitted until now or nobody is secring his vhsost and so did not take notice about it http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=181336 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 262 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20111106/5c799153/attachment.sig>

Hi all, I'm looking for a fix in postgis, which seems to be fixed already in postgis-2.0.7-2.el7. However that package seems to be 'stuck' in the epel7-testing repository: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=750618 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-b6c229157e Is there a reason that the package is not pushed to stable yet? Or can it be pushed to stable? -- Kind regards, Danny

...'d forgotten about that despite being the one who ran > >>> into it. > >>> > >>> Looks like that patch was just removed in 4.9.75-30 which I just > >>> upgraded > >>> this system to: http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=21122 > >>> <http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=21122> > >>> Previously I was on 4.9.63-29 which does not have this problem, and > does > >>> have the ldisc patch. So I guess the question is for Johnny, why was it > >>>...

...up a modified kernel in centOS6. As a simple user, I've downloaded the latests sources (I'm runing an old kernel version) : rpm -i http://vault.centos.org/6.7/updates/Source/SPackages/kernel-2.6.32-573.22.1.el6.src.rpm in the spec file ~/rpmbuild/SPECS/kernel.spec I've set: %define buildid .numa Now I want to set *CONFIG_NUMA_EMU=y* before runing: rpmbuild -bb --without xen --without debug --without debuginfo --target=x86_64 ./SPECS/kernel.spec But where shoud I set this CONFIG_NUMA_EMU option ? I've tested several config files where this options was specified (using grep as...