search for: buildfolder

...* no need to --exclude=/usr/local/smaba/var/lib/samba fpr rsync if you build on a different machine because rpm don't touch files which it didn't create * easy re-use on serveral machines including a testing-one the only real difference is that "make install" goes into the buildfolder - i don't see any advantage in "as it emphasizes that this Samba install is not created from packages" since for a decade now i override postfix, mysql, httpd, apr, php and so on on Fedora with self built packages and a higher epoch in the rpm-spec so that the own repos win

Dears, i have Samba4 and LDAP in CENTOS , but i have install this samba4 in DEBIAN How i to search the equivalent package for compilation samba in Debian repository quickly. I used this below packages for compilation samba4 in CENTOS. findutils readline glibc-devel findutils-locate gcc flex compat-readline4 db-devel gcc-c++ make python libacl-devel libblkid-devel gnutls-devel readline-devel

...cal/smaba/var/lib/samba fpr rsync > if you build on a different machine because rpm don't touch > files which it didn't create > * easy re-use on serveral machines including a testing-one > > the only real difference is that "make install" goes into the > buildfolder - i don't see any advantage in "as it emphasizes that > this Samba install is not created from packages" since for a decade > now i override postfix, mysql, httpd, apr, php and so on on Fedora > with self built packages and a higher epoch in the rpm-spec so that > the own...

...a fpr rsync >> if you build on a different machine because rpm don't touch >> files which it didn't create >> * easy re-use on serveral machines including a testing-one >> >> the only real difference is that "make install" goes into the >> buildfolder - i don't see any advantage in "as it emphasizes that >> this Samba install is not created from packages" since for a decade >> now i override postfix, mysql, httpd, apr, php and so on on Fedora >> with self built packages and a higher epoch in the rpm-spec so that &...

On Sun, 5 Mar 2017 16:30:00 +0100 Reindl Harald via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > that's nitpicking - a wroking setup works as i expect :-) No, its not nitpicking, the OP has an AD DC that is working as recommended, but the OP wants to also use it as a fileserver, so he needs to configure it a bit more. The only problem he really has is, he used the wrong