Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "buildfild".
Did you mean:
buildfile
2010 Sep 22
2
[LLVMdev] r114523 (convert the last 4 X86ISD...) breaks clang
...vm::MachineMemOperand*) + 190
7 clang 0x0000000100933ec7 llvm::SelectionDAG::getMemIntrinsicNode(unsigned int, llvm::DebugLoc, llvm::SDVTList, llvm::SDValue const*, unsigned int, llvm::EVT, llvm::MachineMemOperand*) + 519
8 clang 0x0000000100722db4 llvm::X86TargetLowering::BuildFILD(llvm::SDValue, llvm::EVT, llvm::SDValue, llvm::SDValue, llvm::SelectionDAG&) const + 1380
9 clang 0x0000000100722759 llvm::X86TargetLowering::LowerSINT_TO_FP(llvm::SDValue, llvm::SelectionDAG&) const + 1017
10 clang 0x0000000100978b9b llvm::TargetLowering::LowerOper...
2010 Sep 22
0
[LLVMdev] r114523 (convert the last 4 X86ISD...) breaks clang
...eMemOperand*) + 190
> 7 clang 0x0000000100933ec7 llvm::SelectionDAG::getMemIntrinsicNode(unsigned int, llvm::DebugLoc, llvm::SDVTList, llvm::SDValue const*, unsigned int, llvm::EVT, llvm::MachineMemOperand*) + 519
> 8 clang 0x0000000100722db4 llvm::X86TargetLowering::BuildFILD(llvm::SDValue, llvm::EVT, llvm::SDValue, llvm::SDValue, llvm::SelectionDAG&) const + 1380
> 9 clang 0x0000000100722759 llvm::X86TargetLowering::LowerSINT_TO_FP(llvm::SDValue, llvm::SelectionDAG&) const + 1017
> 10 clang 0x0000000100978b9b llvm::TargetLowering:...
2009 May 21
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Add new phase to legalization to handle vector operations
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Dan Gohman <gohman at apple.com> wrote:
> Can you explain why you chose the approach of using a new pass?
> I pictured removing LegalizeDAG's type legalization code would
> mostly consist of finding all the places that use TLI.getTypeAction
> and just deleting code for handling its Expand and Promote. Are you
> anticipating something more
2009 May 20
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Add new phase to legalization to handle vector operations
On May 20, 2009, at 1:34 PM, Eli Friedman wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Eli Friedman
> <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Per subject, this patch adding an additional pass to handle vector
>>
>> operations; the idea is that this allows removing the code from
>>
>> LegalizeDAG that handles illegal types, which should be a significant
2009 May 21
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Add new phase to legalization to handle vector operations
...ODO: when we have SSE, these could be more efficient, by using movd/movq.
@@ -4608,8 +4612,14 @@
SDValue Chain = DAG.getStore(DAG.getEntryNode(), dl, Op.getOperand(0),
StackSlot,
PseudoSourceValue::getFixedStack(SSFI), 0);
+ return BuildFILD(Op, SrcVT, Chain, StackSlot, DAG);
+}
+SDValue X86TargetLowering::BuildFILD(SDValue Op, MVT SrcVT, SDValue Chain,
+ SDValue StackSlot,
+ SelectionDAG &DAG) {
// Build the FILD
+ DebugLoc dl = Op.getDebugLoc();
SDVT...
2014 Nov 03
8
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Protection against stack-based memory corruption errors using SafeStack
...pointer at a fixed offset
+ /// in some non-standard address space, and populates the address space and
+ /// offset as appropriate.
+ virtual bool getUnsafeStackPtrLocation(unsigned &AddressSpace,
+ unsigned &Offset) const;
+
SDValue BuildFILD(SDValue Op, EVT SrcVT, SDValue Chain, SDValue StackSlot,
SelectionDAG &DAG) const;
diff --git a/lib/Transforms/IPO/Inliner.cpp b/lib/Transforms/IPO/Inliner.cpp
index 4ce6dfe..e0695d2 100644
--- a/lib/Transforms/IPO/Inliner.cpp
+++ b/lib/Transforms/IPO/Inliner.cpp
@@ -93...