Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "build_system".
Did you mean:
build_systems
2012 Jul 13
1
waf workaround?
Is it possible to build samba without waf?
It has slowed down my local samba builds by a factor of 5-10x -- it
seems to lack
any parallelism, and on a 12 core machine, that really sucks.
When going through it's tests, it's noticeably slower than the configure
shell
tests that do the same...
But then the build/make parts all go by like molasses...
What is wrong with standard make
2012 Sep 14
1
Samba 4 rc1 installation attempts
All going fine with new RC1, however one suggestion I would make for the
new configure scripts which are much more helpful than the old style
ones, would be to put more of a warning about ACL support being needed
to successfully provision an domain - or make it a configure failure if
this is not found? Maybe with an option to pass to configure to allow
overriding the error???
. I was aware
2011 Nov 24
0
legacy MTI schema
...:autosave=>:true
delegate :manufacturer,
:manufacturer=,
:serial_number,
:serial_number=,
:installation_date,
:installation_date, :to=>:system
alias system_without_build system
def system
system_without_build || build_system
end
end
In the client code :
lifter = Lifter.new
lifter.id=1327
lifter.installation_date= Date.parse("7/8/2010")
lifter.manufacturer="FooLift"
lifter.serial_number="1324AA"
lifter.drive="Automatic"
lifter.max_weight=1200
lifter.save!
performs this wr...