Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches for "build_src_dir".
2004 Oct 23
1
[LLVMdev] UPDATE: Makefile.rules Changes (IMPORTANT)
...of the .cpp, .c, .y, and .l files
> -# in the current directory. Also, if you want to build files in addition
> -# to the local files, you can use the BUILT_SOURCES variable
> -#
> -# 6. LLVM_SRC_ROOT - If specified, points to the top of the LLVM source tree.
> -#
> -# 8. BUILD_SRC_DIR - The directory which contains the current set of Makefiles
> -# and usually the source code too (unless SourceDir is set).
> -#
> -# 9. BUILD_SRC_ROOT - The root directory of the source code being compiled.
> -#
> -# 10. BUILD_OBJ_DIR - The directory where object code should be p...
2004 Oct 26
1
[LLVMdev] dist-check implemented
....4.tar.gz Ready For Distribution =====
A few things to note:
* "make dist-check" can only be run from the BUILD_OBJ_ROOT directory. If you
try it somewhere else, you'll be politely told you're off your rocker
* "make dist-check" can only be run when BUILD_OBJ_DIR != BUILD_SRC_DIR. If you
try it somewhere else, your hard disk will be reformatted (kidding!)
* don't run "make dist-check" for a BUILD_SRC_DIR that has anything other than
"sample" and "Stacker" in the projects directory. The details for
distributing LLVM Projects haven...
2003 Dec 05
0
[LLVMdev] Re: Makefile.config&setenv
...is section of the Makefile determines what is where. To be
> # specific, there are several locations that need to be defined:
> #
> # o LLVM_SRC_ROOT : The root directory of the LLVM source code.
> # o LLVM_OBJ_ROOT : The root directory containing the built LLVM code.
> #
> # o BUILD_SRC_DIR : The directory containing the code to build.
> # o BUILD_SRC_ROOT : The root directory of the code to build.
> #
> # o BUILD_OBJ_DIR : The directory in which compiled code will be placed.
> # o BUILD_OBJ_ROOT : The root directory in which compiled code is placed.
> #
> ########...
2004 Apr 01
1
[LLVMdev] Makefile.config
Hi John,
I have attached my Makefile.config.
I noticed that I did'nt have SRC_ROOT and OBJ_ROOT variables
defined as such in my environment. But I noticed that this is defined in
the Makefile.config by default to the same values.
All the same, I tried defining both these variables in my .cshrc, but I
still get the same error.
The main directory for me is /home/llvm, and I have
2005 Jan 14
6
[LLVMdev] Proposed Makefile Changes
...ious autoconf generated variables (e.g. abs_top_srcdir) are
set in the makefiles but not used. They conflict with a user's
project that might want to use them. I propose removing them or
using names prefixed with llvm_ to ensure their use is only for
llvm
2. BUILD_SRC_DIR and BUILD_OBJ_DIR are poorly named. This has been
a source of confusion for me personally and probably for others.
They should really be PROJ_SRC_DIR and PROJ_OBJ_DIR to indicate
they pertain to the project's src/obj dir not LLVM's
3. The LLVM makefiles require...
2004 Oct 22
6
[LLVMdev] Makefile.rules Changes / automake update (IMPORTANT!)
...hanges.
All changes will (soon) be documented in a new "LLVM Makefiles" document that
I'll write, but quickly, here's what changed from a USER's perspective:
* ExtraSource variable became BUILT_SOURCES (standard variable name)
* SourceDir variable eliminated (redundant with BUILD_SRC_DIR, few uses)
* Properly allow standard variables to be used (C,CFLAGS,CXX,CXXFLAGS,CPP,
CPPFLAGS, LD, LDFLAGS, AR, ARFLAGS, etc) to alter compilation settings on a
per directory basis.
* Build BUILT_SOURCES first (ensures *.td -> *.inc translation occurs)
* Dependency information is now, by...
2005 Jan 16
0
[LLVMdev] Proposed Makefile Changes
...ariables (e.g. abs_top_srcdir) are
> set in the makefiles but not used. They conflict with a user's
> project that might want to use them. I propose removing them or
> using names prefixed with llvm_ to ensure their use is only for
> llvm
> 2. BUILD_SRC_DIR and BUILD_OBJ_DIR are poorly named. This has been
> a source of confusion for me personally and probably for others.
> They should really be PROJ_SRC_DIR and PROJ_OBJ_DIR to indicate
> they pertain to the project's src/obj dir not LLVM's
> 3. The LLV...
2005 Jan 16
0
[LLVMdev] Proposed Makefile Changes
...ariables (e.g. abs_top_srcdir) are
> set in the makefiles but not used. They conflict with a user's
> project that might want to use them. I propose removing them or
> using names prefixed with llvm_ to ensure their use is only for
> llvm
> 2. BUILD_SRC_DIR and BUILD_OBJ_DIR are poorly named. This has been
> a source of confusion for me personally and probably for others.
> They should really be PROJ_SRC_DIR and PROJ_OBJ_DIR to indicate
> they pertain to the project's src/obj dir not LLVM's
> 3. The LLV...
2004 Oct 22
0
[LLVMdev] Makefile.rules Changes / automake update (IMPORTANT!)
...s will (soon) be documented in a new "LLVM Makefiles" document that
> I'll write, but quickly, here's what changed from a USER's perspective:
>
> * ExtraSource variable became BUILT_SOURCES (standard variable name)
> * SourceDir variable eliminated (redundant with BUILD_SRC_DIR, few uses)
> * Properly allow standard variables to be used (C,CFLAGS,CXX,CXXFLAGS,CPP,
> CPPFLAGS, LD, LDFLAGS, AR, ARFLAGS, etc) to alter compilation settings on a
> per directory basis.
> * Build BUILT_SOURCES first (ensures *.td -> *.inc translation occurs)
> * Dependenc...
2005 Jan 16
1
[LLVMdev] Proposed Makefile Changes
...cdir) are
> > set in the makefiles but not used. They conflict with a user's
> > project that might want to use them. I propose removing them or
> > using names prefixed with llvm_ to ensure their use is only for
> > llvm
> > 2. BUILD_SRC_DIR and BUILD_OBJ_DIR are poorly named. This has been
> > a source of confusion for me personally and probably for others.
> > They should really be PROJ_SRC_DIR and PROJ_OBJ_DIR to indicate
> > they pertain to the project's src/obj dir not LLVM's
>...
2005 Jan 14
0
[LLVMdev] Proposed Makefile Changes
...sing names prefixed with llvm_ to ensure their use is only for
> llvm
If these are really not used, I don't see any harm in removing them. You
should check with people running complex external projects (like the
reoptimizer) to find out if they are really dead though.
> 2. BUILD_SRC_DIR and BUILD_OBJ_DIR are poorly named. This has been
> a source of confusion for me personally and probably for others.
> They should really be PROJ_SRC_DIR and PROJ_OBJ_DIR to indicate
> they pertain to the project's src/obj dir not LLVM's
I totally agree here....