search for: build_src_dir

Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches for "build_src_dir".

2004 Oct 23
1
[LLVMdev] UPDATE: Makefile.rules Changes (IMPORTANT)
...of the .cpp, .c, .y, and .l files > -# in the current directory. Also, if you want to build files in addition > -# to the local files, you can use the BUILT_SOURCES variable > -# > -# 6. LLVM_SRC_ROOT - If specified, points to the top of the LLVM source tree. > -# > -# 8. BUILD_SRC_DIR - The directory which contains the current set of Makefiles > -# and usually the source code too (unless SourceDir is set). > -# > -# 9. BUILD_SRC_ROOT - The root directory of the source code being compiled. > -# > -# 10. BUILD_OBJ_DIR - The directory where object code should be p...
2004 Oct 26
1
[LLVMdev] dist-check implemented
....4.tar.gz Ready For Distribution ===== A few things to note: * "make dist-check" can only be run from the BUILD_OBJ_ROOT directory. If you try it somewhere else, you'll be politely told you're off your rocker * "make dist-check" can only be run when BUILD_OBJ_DIR != BUILD_SRC_DIR. If you try it somewhere else, your hard disk will be reformatted (kidding!) * don't run "make dist-check" for a BUILD_SRC_DIR that has anything other than "sample" and "Stacker" in the projects directory. The details for distributing LLVM Projects haven...
2003 Dec 05
0
[LLVMdev] Re: Makefile.config&setenv
...is section of the Makefile determines what is where. To be > # specific, there are several locations that need to be defined: > # > # o LLVM_SRC_ROOT : The root directory of the LLVM source code. > # o LLVM_OBJ_ROOT : The root directory containing the built LLVM code. > # > # o BUILD_SRC_DIR : The directory containing the code to build. > # o BUILD_SRC_ROOT : The root directory of the code to build. > # > # o BUILD_OBJ_DIR : The directory in which compiled code will be placed. > # o BUILD_OBJ_ROOT : The root directory in which compiled code is placed. > # > ########...
2004 Apr 01
1
[LLVMdev] Makefile.config
Hi John, I have attached my Makefile.config. I noticed that I did'nt have SRC_ROOT and OBJ_ROOT variables defined as such in my environment. But I noticed that this is defined in the Makefile.config by default to the same values. All the same, I tried defining both these variables in my .cshrc, but I still get the same error. The main directory for me is /home/llvm, and I have
2005 Jan 14
6
[LLVMdev] Proposed Makefile Changes
...ious autoconf generated variables (e.g. abs_top_srcdir) are set in the makefiles but not used. They conflict with a user's project that might want to use them. I propose removing them or using names prefixed with llvm_ to ensure their use is only for llvm 2. BUILD_SRC_DIR and BUILD_OBJ_DIR are poorly named. This has been a source of confusion for me personally and probably for others. They should really be PROJ_SRC_DIR and PROJ_OBJ_DIR to indicate they pertain to the project's src/obj dir not LLVM's 3. The LLVM makefiles require...
2004 Oct 22
6
[LLVMdev] Makefile.rules Changes / automake update (IMPORTANT!)
...hanges. All changes will (soon) be documented in a new "LLVM Makefiles" document that I'll write, but quickly, here's what changed from a USER's perspective: * ExtraSource variable became BUILT_SOURCES (standard variable name) * SourceDir variable eliminated (redundant with BUILD_SRC_DIR, few uses) * Properly allow standard variables to be used (C,CFLAGS,CXX,CXXFLAGS,CPP, CPPFLAGS, LD, LDFLAGS, AR, ARFLAGS, etc) to alter compilation settings on a per directory basis. * Build BUILT_SOURCES first (ensures *.td -> *.inc translation occurs) * Dependency information is now, by...
2005 Jan 16
0
[LLVMdev] Proposed Makefile Changes
...ariables (e.g. abs_top_srcdir) are > set in the makefiles but not used. They conflict with a user's > project that might want to use them. I propose removing them or > using names prefixed with llvm_ to ensure their use is only for > llvm > 2. BUILD_SRC_DIR and BUILD_OBJ_DIR are poorly named. This has been > a source of confusion for me personally and probably for others. > They should really be PROJ_SRC_DIR and PROJ_OBJ_DIR to indicate > they pertain to the project's src/obj dir not LLVM's > 3. The LLV...
2005 Jan 16
0
[LLVMdev] Proposed Makefile Changes
...ariables (e.g. abs_top_srcdir) are > set in the makefiles but not used. They conflict with a user's > project that might want to use them. I propose removing them or > using names prefixed with llvm_ to ensure their use is only for > llvm > 2. BUILD_SRC_DIR and BUILD_OBJ_DIR are poorly named. This has been > a source of confusion for me personally and probably for others. > They should really be PROJ_SRC_DIR and PROJ_OBJ_DIR to indicate > they pertain to the project's src/obj dir not LLVM's > 3. The LLV...
2004 Oct 22
0
[LLVMdev] Makefile.rules Changes / automake update (IMPORTANT!)
...s will (soon) be documented in a new "LLVM Makefiles" document that > I'll write, but quickly, here's what changed from a USER's perspective: > > * ExtraSource variable became BUILT_SOURCES (standard variable name) > * SourceDir variable eliminated (redundant with BUILD_SRC_DIR, few uses) > * Properly allow standard variables to be used (C,CFLAGS,CXX,CXXFLAGS,CPP, > CPPFLAGS, LD, LDFLAGS, AR, ARFLAGS, etc) to alter compilation settings on a > per directory basis. > * Build BUILT_SOURCES first (ensures *.td -> *.inc translation occurs) > * Dependenc...
2005 Jan 16
1
[LLVMdev] Proposed Makefile Changes
...cdir) are > > set in the makefiles but not used. They conflict with a user's > > project that might want to use them. I propose removing them or > > using names prefixed with llvm_ to ensure their use is only for > > llvm > > 2. BUILD_SRC_DIR and BUILD_OBJ_DIR are poorly named. This has been > > a source of confusion for me personally and probably for others. > > They should really be PROJ_SRC_DIR and PROJ_OBJ_DIR to indicate > > they pertain to the project's src/obj dir not LLVM's >...
2005 Jan 14
0
[LLVMdev] Proposed Makefile Changes
...sing names prefixed with llvm_ to ensure their use is only for > llvm If these are really not used, I don't see any harm in removing them. You should check with people running complex external projects (like the reoptimizer) to find out if they are really dead though. > 2. BUILD_SRC_DIR and BUILD_OBJ_DIR are poorly named. This has been > a source of confusion for me personally and probably for others. > They should really be PROJ_SRC_DIR and PROJ_OBJ_DIR to indicate > they pertain to the project's src/obj dir not LLVM's I totally agree here....