search for: build_obj_dir

Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches for "build_obj_dir".

2003 Dec 05
0
[LLVMdev] Re: Makefile.config&setenv
...o LLVM_SRC_ROOT : The root directory of the LLVM source code. > # o LLVM_OBJ_ROOT : The root directory containing the built LLVM code. > # > # o BUILD_SRC_DIR : The directory containing the code to build. > # o BUILD_SRC_ROOT : The root directory of the code to build. > # > # o BUILD_OBJ_DIR : The directory in which compiled code will be placed. > # o BUILD_OBJ_ROOT : The root directory in which compiled code is placed. > # > ########################################################################### > > # > # Set the object build directory. By default, it is the c...
2004 Apr 01
1
[LLVMdev] Makefile.config
Hi John, I have attached my Makefile.config. I noticed that I did'nt have SRC_ROOT and OBJ_ROOT variables defined as such in my environment. But I noticed that this is defined in the Makefile.config by default to the same values. All the same, I tried defining both these variables in my .cshrc, but I still get the same error. The main directory for me is /home/llvm, and I have
2004 Oct 23
1
[LLVMdev] UPDATE: Makefile.rules Changes (IMPORTANT)
...p of the LLVM source tree. > -# > -# 8. BUILD_SRC_DIR - The directory which contains the current set of Makefiles > -# and usually the source code too (unless SourceDir is set). > -# > -# 9. BUILD_SRC_ROOT - The root directory of the source code being compiled. > -# > -# 10. BUILD_OBJ_DIR - The directory where object code should be placed. > -# > -# 11. BUILD_OBJ_ROOT - The root directory for where object code should be > -# placed. > -# > -# For building, > -# LLVM, LLVM_SRC_ROOT = BUILD_SRC_ROOT > +# This file is included by all of the LLVM makefiles. Fo...
2004 Oct 26
1
[LLVMdev] dist-check implemented
...lvm/build2/LLVM-1.4.tar.gz Ready For Distribution ===== A few things to note: * "make dist-check" can only be run from the BUILD_OBJ_ROOT directory. If you try it somewhere else, you'll be politely told you're off your rocker * "make dist-check" can only be run when BUILD_OBJ_DIR != BUILD_SRC_DIR. If you try it somewhere else, your hard disk will be reformatted (kidding!) * don't run "make dist-check" for a BUILD_SRC_DIR that has anything other than "sample" and "Stacker" in the projects directory. The details for distributing LLVM...
2005 Jan 14
6
[LLVMdev] Proposed Makefile Changes
...rated variables (e.g. abs_top_srcdir) are set in the makefiles but not used. They conflict with a user's project that might want to use them. I propose removing them or using names prefixed with llvm_ to ensure their use is only for llvm 2. BUILD_SRC_DIR and BUILD_OBJ_DIR are poorly named. This has been a source of confusion for me personally and probably for others. They should really be PROJ_SRC_DIR and PROJ_OBJ_DIR to indicate they pertain to the project's src/obj dir not LLVM's 3. The LLVM makefiles require a Makefile.config...
2004 Oct 22
6
[LLVMdev] Makefile.rules Changes / automake update (IMPORTANT!)
.... There was some overlap. Standardizing these will encourage future targets to use them. These rules are available if you set the TARGET variable. * $(DEST*) variables are gone unless they specifically refer to the installation destination. These conflicted with standard makefile usage * $(BUILD_OBJ_DIR)/$(CONFIGURATION) became $(OBJDIR) to simplify it. This is where object files should go. * $(LIBDIR) is where libraries should go * $(TOOLDIR) is where tools (executables) should go * VERBOSE=1 mode is now even quieter (a few rules were missing $(VERB) * Build messages have been corrected and ma...
2005 Jan 16
0
[LLVMdev] Proposed Makefile Changes
..._top_srcdir) are > set in the makefiles but not used. They conflict with a user's > project that might want to use them. I propose removing them or > using names prefixed with llvm_ to ensure their use is only for > llvm > 2. BUILD_SRC_DIR and BUILD_OBJ_DIR are poorly named. This has been > a source of confusion for me personally and probably for others. > They should really be PROJ_SRC_DIR and PROJ_OBJ_DIR to indicate > they pertain to the project's src/obj dir not LLVM's > 3. The LLVM makefiles requir...
2005 Jan 16
0
[LLVMdev] Proposed Makefile Changes
..._top_srcdir) are > set in the makefiles but not used. They conflict with a user's > project that might want to use them. I propose removing them or > using names prefixed with llvm_ to ensure their use is only for > llvm > 2. BUILD_SRC_DIR and BUILD_OBJ_DIR are poorly named. This has been > a source of confusion for me personally and probably for others. > They should really be PROJ_SRC_DIR and PROJ_OBJ_DIR to indicate > they pertain to the project's src/obj dir not LLVM's > 3. The LLVM makefiles requir...
2004 Oct 22
0
[LLVMdev] Makefile.rules Changes / automake update (IMPORTANT!)
...Standardizing these will > encourage future targets to use them. These rules are available if you set > the TARGET variable. > * $(DEST*) variables are gone unless they specifically refer to the > installation destination. These conflicted with standard makefile usage > * $(BUILD_OBJ_DIR)/$(CONFIGURATION) became $(OBJDIR) to simplify it. This is > where object files should go. > * $(LIBDIR) is where libraries should go > * $(TOOLDIR) is where tools (executables) should go > * VERBOSE=1 mode is now even quieter (a few rules were missing $(VERB) > * Build messages h...
2005 Jan 16
1
[LLVMdev] Proposed Makefile Changes
...; set in the makefiles but not used. They conflict with a user's > > project that might want to use them. I propose removing them or > > using names prefixed with llvm_ to ensure their use is only for > > llvm > > 2. BUILD_SRC_DIR and BUILD_OBJ_DIR are poorly named. This has been > > a source of confusion for me personally and probably for others. > > They should really be PROJ_SRC_DIR and PROJ_OBJ_DIR to indicate > > they pertain to the project's src/obj dir not LLVM's > > 3. The L...
2005 Jan 14
0
[LLVMdev] Proposed Makefile Changes
...d with llvm_ to ensure their use is only for > llvm If these are really not used, I don't see any harm in removing them. You should check with people running complex external projects (like the reoptimizer) to find out if they are really dead though. > 2. BUILD_SRC_DIR and BUILD_OBJ_DIR are poorly named. This has been > a source of confusion for me personally and probably for others. > They should really be PROJ_SRC_DIR and PROJ_OBJ_DIR to indicate > they pertain to the project's src/obj dir not LLVM's I totally agree here. > 3. The L...