Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "build_arm".
2017 Mar 14
2
[cfe-dev] proposal - pragma section directive in clang
...;.myrodata",
data=".mydata", text=".mytext"
Alternatively, supporting vendor-specific spellings might be useful, if
there's a consistency argument to be made for clang doing it its own way.
Docs are pages 108/109 here:
http://www.ece.ualberta.ca/~cmpe490/documents/ghs/build_arm.pdf
Jon
>
> The pragma applies to all global variable and function declarations
> from the pragma to the end of the translation unit. The pragma
> should ideally be pushable and poppable, but that is outside the
> scope of this RFC. The pragma also applies to stati...
2008 Oct 15
2
SMBD panic with INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 6 for ARM 922T
...er is in 2 groups: 0, 10
smbd version 3.0.28a started.
Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2008
uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 egid=0
Build environment:
Built by: jronald@jronald-desktop
Built on: Wed Oct 15 13:37:49 EDT 2008
Built using:
/home/jronald/phoenix/trunk/buildroot-21758/build_arm/staging_dir/usr/bin/arm-linux-uclibcgnueabi-gcc
Build host: Linux jronald-desktop 2.6.24-21-generic #1 SMP Mon Aug
25 17:32:09 UTC 2008 i686 GNU/Linux
SRCDIR:
/home/jronald/phoenix/trunk/buildroot-21758/build_arm/samba-3.0.28a/source
BUILDDIR:
/home/jronald/phoenix/trunk/buildroot-21758/b...
2017 Mar 14
2
[cfe-dev] proposal - pragma section directive in clang
...;.mydata", text=".mytext"
>
> Alternatively, supporting vendor-specific spellings might be useful, if
> there's a consistency argument to be made for clang doing it its own way.
>
> Docs are pages 108/109 here:
> http://www.ece.ualberta.ca/~cmpe490/documents/ghs/build_arm.pdf
>
>
> Jon
>
> >
> > The pragma applies to all global variable and function declarations
> > from the pragma to the end of the translation unit. The pragma
> > should ideally be pushable and poppable, but that is outside the
> > scope of...
2017 Mar 10
3
[cfe-dev] proposal - pragma section directive in clang
+llvm-dev properly this time.
On Fri, 10 Mar 2017 at 09:42 James Molloy <james at jamesmolloy.co.uk> wrote:
> Hi Reid, all,
>
> +llvm-dev as this RFC involves changes in Clang and LLVM.
>
> This RFC has stagnated and I think that's partially because the proposal
> isn't particularly elegant and is light on details. We've been having a
> rethink and have a