search for: build_

...ious autoconf generated variables (e.g. abs_top_srcdir) are set in the makefiles but not used. They conflict with a user's project that might want to use them. I propose removing them or using names prefixed with llvm_ to ensure their use is only for llvm 2. BUILD_SRC_DIR and BUILD_OBJ_DIR are poorly named. This has been a source of confusion for me personally and probably for others. They should really be PROJ_SRC_DIR and PROJ_OBJ_DIR to indicate they pertain to the project's src/obj dir not LLVM's 3. The LLVM makefiles r...

The proposed makefile changes have been committed. If you are working from CVS head and you use the LLVM Makefile System in your own project, please make a note of the following: 1. If your makefiles use any BUILD_* variables, they now need to be prefixed with PROJ_ instead of BUILD_. For example, BUILD_SRC_ROOT is now PROJ_SRC_ROOT. 2. There are additional requirements for projects. Please review this file: http://illuvium.net/src/projects/sample/Makefile.common.in On Fr...

The proposed makefile changes have been committed. If you are working from CVS head and you use the LLVM Makefile System in your own project, please make a note of the following: 1. If your makefiles use any BUILD_* variables, they now need to be prefixed with PROJ_ instead of BUILD_. For example, BUILD_SRC_ROOT is now PROJ_SRC_ROOT. 2. There are additional requirements for projects. Please review this file: http://illuvium.net/src/projects/sample/Makefile.common.in as it contains th...

...s.html Reid. On Sat, 2005-01-15 at 18:30, Reid Spencer wrote: > The proposed makefile changes have been committed. If you are working > from CVS head and you use the LLVM Makefile System in your own project, > please make a note of the following: > > 1. If your makefiles use any BUILD_* variables, they now need to be > prefixed with PROJ_ instead of BUILD_. For example, > BUILD_SRC_ROOT is now PROJ_SRC_ROOT. > > 2. There are additional requirements for projects. Please review > this file: > http://illuvium.net/src/projects/sample/Makefile.co...

Hi, I am still struggling to cross-compile LLVM (using trunk). My cross compiler builds code that cannot be run on the build host. Thus, I need to make use of BUILD_CC/CXX during configuration. My current setup is (heavily boiled down): ../configure CC=cc_cross CXX=cxx_cross BUILD_CC=cc_host BUILD_CXX=cxx_host (plus other flag stuff) The configuration runs fine. However, when calling 'make' it would construct the BuildTools in a way that doesn't...

...sing names prefixed with llvm_ to ensure their use is only for > llvm If these are really not used, I don't see any harm in removing them. You should check with people running complex external projects (like the reoptimizer) to find out if they are really dead though. > 2. BUILD_SRC_DIR and BUILD_OBJ_DIR are poorly named. This has been > a source of confusion for me personally and probably for others. > They should really be PROJ_SRC_DIR and PROJ_OBJ_DIR to indicate > they pertain to the project's src/obj dir not LLVM's I totally agree...

Is there a way with ActiveRecord to get ahold of a collection containing each association? I want to write a rake task that will dump a model and all its related models to yaml. Thanks, Dave -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060323/abdf4305/attachment.html

Hello Jianzhou, On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 8:25 PM, Jianzhou Zhao <jianzhou at seas.upenn.edu> wrote: > Hi, > > Does 2.8 release plan to change anything in Ocaml bindings? > http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html#whatsnew does not list any > relevant features. I usually wait until around nowish before a release to sync llvm-c and the ocaml bindings. I'll start the process.

I need to rsync 4 TB datafiles to remote server and clone to a new oracle database..I have about 40 drives that contains this 4 TB data. I would like to do rsync from a directory level by using --files-from=FILE option. But the problem is what will happen if the network connection fails the whole rsync will fail right. rsync -a srchost:/ / --files-from=dbf-list and dbf-list would contain this:

...wing lines somewhere (namely, line 51) in xapian.h.in: ---8-<------------- // Backends #define XAPIAN_BACKEND_MUSCAT36 #define XAPIAN_BACKEND_QUARTZ #define XAPIAN_BACKEND_INMEMORY #define XAPIAN_BACKEND_REMOTE ---8-<------------- - added the following to configure.ac, at line 374 (to have $build_* set): ---8-<------------- dnl @@MODIFIED@@ - Franz dnl Remove unsupported backend #defines from xapian.h.in and output xapian.h AC_MSG_CHECKING([for backends to exclude in xapian.h]) desc_excluded_backends="" excluded_backends="\\#define XAPIAN_BACKEND_\(DUMMY" if test fa...

Hi, Does 2.8 release plan to change anything in Ocaml bindings? http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html#whatsnew does not list any relevant features. 2.7 added 'operand' that can access each operand from a value. external operand : llvalue -> int -> llvalue = "llvm_operand" Does this binding also expose a primitive to return how many operands a given value has? I need

I have two objects, QuoteInput and Insured. QuoteInput has one Insured and Insured belongs to QuoteInput. I don''t understand what I''m seeing. I assign an Insured to a QuoteInput. The Insured object has invalid data. I call save! on the quote input. QuoteInput has no validations. I expect two things to happen - 1) an exception should be thrown, indicating that there was a

...ntroller"=>"projects"} Rendering projects/index_js ActionView::TemplateError (Invalid argument - C:/Server/cruisedata/projects/myproject/builder.lock) on line #1 of app/views/projects/_project.rhtml: 1: <div id="project_<%= project.name %>" class="project build_<%= project.last_complete_build_status %>"> 2: <table class="project_pane"> 3: <tr> 4: #{RAILS_ROOT}/lib/file_lock.rb:36:in `flock'' #{RAILS_ROOT}/lib/file_lock.rb:36:in `locked?'' #{RAILS_ROOT}/lib/project_blocker.rb:7:in `blocked?...

...xwayland: Lock the pointer if it is confined and has no cursor Xi: Use WarpPointerProc hook on XI pointer warping implementation xwayland: Remove two unused proc pointers. xwayland: Keep separate variables for pointer and tablet foci Chris Lamb (1): configure.ac: Make BUILD_{DATE, TIME} respect SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH if set Chris Wilson (5): xfree86: Take the input lock for xf86RecolorCursor xfree86: Take input lock for xf86TransparentCursor xfree86: Take input_lock() for xf86ScreenCheckHWCursor inputthread: Initialise inputThreadInfo->changed be...

Hi Everyone, This is off-topic, so please feel free to disregard it, but I'm sending it to this list in the hope that it will reach a largish number of users. I am currently looking at updating some of our advocacy material (which advertises exciting new features like SMP support), and before I do I'd like to get a better feel for why the rest of you are using FreeBSD. If you had to