search for: buiilds

Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "buiilds".

Did you mean: builds
2015 Feb 18
4
[LLVMdev] RFC: Dropping support for building sanitizers with autotools
> On Feb 17, 2015, at 4:00 PM, Alexey Samsonov <vonosmas at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Anna Zaks <ganna at apple.com <mailto:ganna at apple.com>> wrote: > Unfortunately, we do rely on the Autotools to build for darwin. > > The lack of proper testing is very unfortunate. In the future, we will either drop the dependency on
2014 Sep 24
2
[LLVMdev] RFC: LLVM should require a working C++11 <thread>, <mutex>, and <atomic>
Indeed, mingw and pthreads have C++11 atomics, so building clang (with atomics) should be possible even in cross compilation. I have no idea what is the win from *not* using winpthreads, it is one small DLL file with BSD license. For context (does not matter to mingw as host for buiilding clang but matters for clang running with mingw environment), clang TLS implementation is not same as mingw so
2011 Aug 12
1
Debian Wheezy and Wine
Hi, I want to compile Wine but I have some problems First, Code: apt-get install build-essential then Code: apt-get buiild-dep wine But I got this error: Code: E: Unable to find a source package for wine I think I need the wine repo for Debian Wheezy, but I don't find them, can you please help me? thanks
2015 Feb 24
5
[LLVMdev] RFC: Dropping support for building sanitizers with autotools
On 18/02/2015 23:29, Alexey Samsonov wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Anna Zaks <ganna at apple.com <mailto:ganna at apple.com>> wrote: > > >> On Feb 17, 2015, at 4:00 PM, Alexey Samsonov <vonosmas at gmail.com <mailto:vonosmas at gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> >> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Anna Zaks <ganna at
2015 Feb 17
6
[LLVMdev] RFC: Dropping support for building sanitizers with autotools
Unfortunately, we do rely on the Autotools to build for darwin. The lack of proper testing is very unfortunate. In the future, we will either drop the dependency on Makefile/autoconf build or add the support for sanitizer testing. Anna. > On Feb 17, 2015, at 10:54 AM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote: > > +1 (in case you still need mine) > > On Thu, Feb 12,
2007 Apr 11
1
Calling LAPACK functions directly from R
I am interested in tapping into LAPACK functionality directly from R. Using R-2.4.1 for Windows, I was able to do so ala: dyn.load("bin/Rlapack.dll") is.loaded("dstebz") # returns TRUE N <- 100 NW <- 4 n.tapers <- 5 tpW <- (2 * pi * NW)/N otNmo <- 1:N D <- as.double(cos(tpW) * ((N - 1 - 2 * (0:(N - 1)))/2)^2) E <- as.double((otNmo * (N - otNmo))/2) z
2002 Feb 28
4
Update to solaris package creation
Can someone else from the Solaris realm that uses our package system verify that this should be done? It looks right, but I want another opinion before commiting. - Ben > On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, Antonio Navarro wrote: > >> Hi Ben, >> >> I have made some modifications to the buildpkg.sh script that is >> distributed with openssh. >> >> I am sending it to
2014 Sep 24
14
[LLVMdev] RFC: LLVM should require a working C++11 <thread>, <mutex>, and <atomic>
AKA: MinGW + win32threads is holding LLVM (and all of its subprojects) back. We need to stop supporting this host platform. I'm aware of essentially 2 reasonably important use cases for supporting MinGW + win32threads: 1) Sane host toolchain on Windows that doesn't require downloading MSVC. (I'm dubious about the value of this one...) 2) Cross-compiling a Windows clang.exe (and