Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "buidbots".
Did you mean:
buildbots
2010 Feb 15
0
[LLVMdev] Botched Build
On Monday 15 February 2010 15:08:22 Chris Lattner wrote:
> On Feb 15, 2010, at 1:04 PM, David Greene wrote:
> >> FWIW, this is because you broke the encoding of an instruction in your
> >> patch. This is incorrect:
> >>
> >> +def MOVNTDQ_64mr : PSI<0xE7, MRMDestMem, (outs), (ins f128mem:$dst,
> >> VR128:$src), +
2010 Feb 15
4
[LLVMdev] Botched Build
On Feb 15, 2010, at 1:04 PM, David Greene wrote:
>> FWIW, this is because you broke the encoding of an instruction in your
>> patch. This is incorrect:
>>
>> +def MOVNTDQ_64mr : PSI<0xE7, MRMDestMem, (outs), (ins f128mem:$dst,
>> VR128:$src), + "movntdq\t{$src, $dst|$dst, $src}",
>> + [(alignednontemporalstore
2010 Feb 15
3
[LLVMdev] Botched Build
On Feb 15, 2010, at 1:17 PM, David Greene wrote:
> On Monday 15 February 2010 15:08:22 Chris Lattner wrote:
>> On Feb 15, 2010, at 1:04 PM, David Greene wrote:
>>>> FWIW, this is because you broke the encoding of an instruction in your
>>>> patch. This is incorrect:
>>>>
>>>> +def MOVNTDQ_64mr : PSI<0xE7, MRMDestMem, (outs), (ins
2015 May 01
2
[LLVMdev] libiomp, not libgomp as default library linked with -fopenmp
Hal,
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote:
> We need to get the build system integration committed and the buildbots
> updated to compile it
>
If you are speaking on libiomp buidbots, they are already established:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/libiomp5-clang-x86_64-linux-debian
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/libiomp5-gcc-x86_64-linux-debian
Andrey
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev...
2010 Feb 16
0
[LLVMdev] Botched Build
On Monday 15 February 2010 15:27:34 Chris Lattner wrote:
> On Feb 15, 2010, at 1:17 PM, David Greene wrote:
> > On Monday 15 February 2010 15:08:22 Chris Lattner wrote:
> >> On Feb 15, 2010, at 1:04 PM, David Greene wrote:
> >>>> FWIW, this is because you broke the encoding of an instruction in your
> >>>> patch. This is incorrect:
>
2010 Feb 15
1
[LLVMdev] Botched Build
Unless others find this objectionable, it would be nice to see the grammar for metadata
instruction attachment in the http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#metadata section. The
grammar you gave earlier seems to work.
Garrison
On Feb 15, 2010, at 16:17, David Greene wrote:
> On Monday 15 February 2010 15:08:22 Chris Lattner wrote:
>> On Feb 15, 2010, at 1:04 PM, David Greene wrote:
2015 Apr 30
17
[LLVMdev] libiomp, not libgomp as default library linked with -fopenmp
All,
I'd like to resurrect the discussion on replacing libgomp with libiomp as
the default OpenMP runtime library linked with -fopenmp.
For reference, the previous discussion is accessible there:
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20140217/thread.html#99461
We are very close to getting *full* OpenMP 3.1 specification supported in
clang (only one (!) clause is not