search for: bugpoint_rexec

...d there, and how > the result of execution will be returned back to the host. > So, it expects the "remote client" - whatever it is - take care of > those 3 things. > The RemoteRunSafely.sh does all these by using ssh. Alright. But then the script probably should be named bugpoint_rexec.sh or something. Also, can you enhance it so it supports ssh (also takes a -p option)? Chris, what do you think? I am not crazy about it living under tools/ bugpoint. But I don't see a more sensible place. Evan > > Viktor > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Evan...

> bugpoint should be a standalone tool. It should not require a separate > script to handle remote execution. Why is the script needed? Bugpoint is a standalone too and does not require any separate script. The script is a helper for using ssh as a remote client. Bugpoint should not be aware of any details how the test program will be delivered to a remote target, get executed there, and