search for: bugfind

Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "bugfind".

Did you mean: bugfix
2009 Nov 19
3
[LLVMdev] opt and bugs
...M bugs by doing the first of these, but not the second: we test only -O[0123s]. Slowly but surely, LLVM is evolving resistance to our random tester. Of course this is good, but it means that we need to keep expanding our efforts if we want to continue to get solid return on investment for our bugfinding hours. My first question is: When we start running random combinations of passes using opt, which ones should we leave out, because you folks don't want to hear that they're wrong? For example, the other day I learned that ABCD is not yet ready for this sort of testing. A while ag...
2002 Oct 09
2
rsync-2.5.5 memory eater problem
...1, f) != 1) exit_cleanup(RERR_MESSAGEIO); + if (fwrite(buf, len, 1, f) != 1 && errno != EPIPE) exit_cleanup(RERR_MESSAGEIO); if (buf[len-1] == '\r' || buf[len-1] == '\n') fflush(f); } -- with kind regards (mit freundlichem Grinsen), Ruediger Oertel (ro@suse.de,bugfinder@t-online.de) ----------This machine does not crash randomly.----------- It only schedules a hangup when deemed appropriate.
2009 Nov 19
0
[LLVMdev] opt and bugs
...these, but not the > second: we test only -O[0123s]. > > Slowly but surely, LLVM is evolving resistance to our random tester. Of > course this is good, but it means that we need to keep expanding our > efforts if we want to continue to get solid return on investment for our > bugfinding hours. > > My first question is: When we start running random combinations of > passes using opt, which ones should we leave out, because you folks > don't want to hear that they're wrong? For example, the other day I > learned that ABCD is not yet ready for this sort...
2008 Apr 15
1
rsync-3.0.2 fails testsuite in itemize
...ym -> ../bar/baz/rsync test 3 failed ----- itemize log ends FAIL itemize not sure if this has been reported already, one of the bugreports looked like it but was closed as fixed over a month ago. -- with kind regards (mit freundlichem Grinsen), Ruediger Oertel (ro@novell.com,ro@suse.de,bugfinder@t-online.de) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Linux Fatou 2.6.25-rc8-12-default #1 SMP 2008-04-02 01:36:51 +0200 x86_64 Key fingerprint = 17DC 6553 86A7 384B 53C5 CA5C 3CE4 F2E7 23F2 B417 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG N?rnberg)
2008 Apr 15
1
rsync-patches-3.0.2 duplicate hunk
HI, patches/xattrs.diff repeats the man-page change from patches/slp.diff producing an error if you try to apply both patches. -- with kind regards (mit freundlichem Grinsen), Ruediger Oertel (ro@novell.com,ro@suse.de,bugfinder@t-online.de) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Linux Fatou 2.6.25-rc8-12-default #1 SMP 2008-04-02 01:36:51 +0200 x86_64 Key fingerprint = 17DC 6553 86A7 384B 53C5 CA5C 3CE4 F2E7 23F2 B417 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG N?rnberg)
2004 May 09
2
[BUG] rsync 2.6.2
After upgrade from previous version I can't run rsync. 2004/05/09 10:40:54 [18630] rsyncd version 2.6.2 starting, listening on port 873 2004/05/09 10:40:54 [18630] rsync error: error in socket IO (code 10) at socket.c(466) strace shows that there is problem with listen() I've found patch on this lists: --- rsync-2.6.2/socket.c.orig 2004-05-08 23:25:11.979473336 +0200 +++