search for: bugdatabase

We just updated our configuratiosn to have multiple NIS servers, when we initiated a test of client failover, we were disapointed. It seemed that the only way to get a filaover was to /etc/init.d/ypbind restart. It behaves as indicated in http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=5084845 using ypbind-1.17.2-13 on Centos 4.5 / Linux xxxxxxxxxxxx 2.6.9-55.0.12.ELsmp #1 SMP Fri Nov 2 12:38:56 EDT 2007 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=4858192 Any advice? -Jason -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=...

Currently I''m trying to figure out the best zfs layout for a thumper wrt. to read AND write performance. I did some simple mkfile 512G tests and found out, that per average ~ 500 MB/s seems to be the maximum on can reach (tried initial default setup, all 46 HDDs as R0, etc.). According to http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/content_type/DownloadableAssets/ArchitectureWP_062806.pdf I would

Zpool split is a wonderful feature and it seems to work well, and the choice of which disk got which name was perfect! But there seems to be an odd anomaly (at least with b132) . Started with c0t1d0s0 running b132 (root pool is called rpool) Attached c0t0d0s0 and waited for it to resilver Rebooted from c0t0d0s0 zpool split rpool spool Rebooted from c0t0d0s0, both rpool and spool were mounted

Hi everyone, Is there an easy way to find out which files has changed between two snapshots? Currently I''m doing a # rsync -arvn <snapshot1> <snapshot2> and it creates a list. But rsync needs to go through the whole filesystem and compare files. It would be nice if zfs would have this option builtin. Regards, Nickus

While thinking about ZFS as the next generation filesystem without limits I am wondering if the real world is ready for this kind of incredible technology ... I''m actually speaking of hardware :) ZFS can handle a lot of devices. Once in the import bug (http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6761786) is fixed it should be able to handle a lot of disks. I want to ask the ZFS community and users what large scale deploments are out there. How man disks ? How much capacity ? Single pool or many pools on a server ? How does resilver work in those environtments ? How to...

I just installed build 41 of Nevada on a SunBlade 1500 with 2GB of ram. I wanted to check out zfs since the delay of S10U2 I really could not wait any longer :) I installed it on my system and created a zpool out of an approximately 40GB disk slice. I then wanted to build a version of thunderbird that contains a local patch that we like. So I download the source tar ball. I try to untar it on the

What does it mean for the reported value of a zvol volsize to be less than the product of used and compressratio? For example, # zfs get -p all home1/home1mm01 NAME PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE home1/home1mm01 type volume - home1/home1mm01 creation 1254440045 - home1/home1mm01 used 14902492672

I''m using Solaris 10u6 updated to u7 via patches, and I have a pool with a mirrored pair and a (shared) hot spare. We reconfigured disks a while ago and now the controller is c4 instead of c2. The hot spare was originally on c2, and apparently on rebooting it didn''t get found. So, I looked up what the new name for the hot spare was, then added it to the pool with "zpool

Hi, I''m referring to; http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6977913 It should be in Solaris 11 Express, has anyone tried this? How this is supposed to work? Any documentation available? Yours Markus Kovero -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/zfs-discuss...

Dear all We ran into a nasty problem the other day. One of our mirrored zpool hosts several ZFS filesystems. After a reboot (all FS mounted at that time an in use) the machine paniced (console output further down). After detaching one of the mirrors the pool fortunately imported automatically in a faulted state without mounting the filesystems. Offling the unplugged device and clearing the fault

Hello, According to http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=4970596 and other notes I read it appears that the ability to run dtrace programs (by having dtrace_proc and dtrace_user privileges configured inside NGZ''s) has been made available (through various projects) since build 37 of Nevada. I am not merely referring to con...

Is there a mechanism by which you can perform a zfs send | zfs receive and not have the data uncompressed and recompressed at the other end? I have a gzip-9 compressed filesystem that I want to backup to a remote system and would prefer not to have to recompress everything again at such great computation expense. If this doesn''t exist, how would one go about creating an RFE for

6727404: intermittent fdisk errors while installing xVM Server guests http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6727404 Is that (at least case #1) the same as OpenSolaris 2008.05 bug 2133 (comment #22)? http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=2133 In some cases the Solaris ata driver is returning a slightly truncated capacity with the DIOCTL_GETGEOM / DIOCTL_GETPHYGEOM ioct...

I see there are some bugzilla links open but not really sure if they conform to the same behaviour what I see. http://www.mail-archive.com/samba at lists.samba.org/msg94854.html https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5315 http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6213298 http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do;jsessionid=991fdfd56a9fcffffffffcbbb8cdf50d6de3?bug_id=4313887 http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=203 On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 9:59 PM, Nikhil <mnikhil at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > We have a CIFS server runni...

I have just upgraded my jumpstart server to S10 u2 b9a. It is an Ultra 10 with two 120GB EIDE drives. The second drive (disk1) is new, and has u2b9a installed on a slice, with most of the space in slice 7 for the ZFS pool I created pool1 on disk1, and created the filesystem pool1/ro (for legacy reasons). I them moved my data from the original disk0 UFS file system to pool1/ro. Initially I

...tool, but I can see that it is not easy. When ZFS pool is fragmented then: 1. spa_sync function is executing very long ( > 5 seconds ) 2. spa_sync thread often takes 100% CPU 3. metaslab space map is very big There are some changes hidding the problem like this http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6512391 and I hope there will be available in Solaris 10 update 4 But I suggest that: 1. in sync phase when for the first time we did not found block we need ( for example 128k ), pool schould remember this for some time ( 5 minutes ) and stop asking for this kind of blocks....

Hi, I am wondering if there is a guideline on how to configure ZFS on a server with Oracle database? We are experiencing some slowness on writes to ZFS filesystem. It take about 530ms to write a 2k data. We are running Solaris 10 u5 127127-11 and the back-end storage is a RAID5 EMC EMX. This is a small database with about 18gb storage allocated. Is there a tunable parameters that we can apply to

...ected to the same vlans when trying to ping the DomU from Dom0, I can see with snoop (in Dom0) and tcpdump (in DomU) that ARP-packets reach the DomU and the DomU answers, but the replies never reach Dom0. I have tried approximately the same thing with zones, like this: http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6810953 and I am able to ping between all three zones (the global and the two non-global zones) My internet-connection is also through a VLAN and the connection to nearest switch is VLAN-tagged. It seems: - vlans work OK - vlans in zones work OK - if I configure the DomU-net...

I try to run tcptop in solaris 10 x86 with patch level 125101-04 and I get the following error /usr/include/sys/zone.h line 16: can''t find include file sys/tsol/label.h error. Is there a work around for this problem? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org

I just installed opensolaris build 130 which i downloaded from genunix. The install went fine....and the first reboot after install seemed to work but when i powered down and rebooted fully, it locks up as soon as i log in. Gnome is still showing the icon it shows when stuff hasn''t finished loading....is there any way i can find out why it''s locking up and how to fix it?