search for: buffer_t

...ramework, easier debugging when things-go-wrong, etc.). > Also, just looking quickly at one IR I'm surprised by things like: > > "assert succeeded165": ; preds = %"assert succeeded146" > %buf_host181 = getelementptr inbounds %struct.buffer_t, %struct.buffer_t* %error_op_pcmpeqq_272.buffer, i64 0, i32 1 > %23 = bitcast i8** %buf_host181 to double** > %error_op_pcmpeqq_272.host226227232 = load double*, double** %23, align 8 > %24 = icmp eq %struct.buffer_t* %error_op_pcmpeqq_272.buffer, null > br i1 %24, label %"...

...error checking and eliminate it for instance, making any error undetected. Also, just looking quickly at one IR I'm surprised by things like: "assert succeeded165": ; preds = %"assert succeeded146" %buf_host181 = getelementptr inbounds %struct.buffer_t, %struct.buffer_t* %error_op_pcmpeqq_272.buffer, i64 0, i32 1 %23 = bitcast i8** %buf_host181 to double** %error_op_pcmpeqq_272.host226227232 = load double*, double** %23, align 8 %24 = icmp eq %struct.buffer_t* %error_op_pcmpeqq_272.buffer, null br i1 %24, label %"assert failed183&quo...

...ay once an error is found. Sound about right? > > Also, just looking quickly at one IR I'm surprised by things like: > > "assert succeeded165": ; preds = %"assert > succeeded146" > %buf_host181 = getelementptr inbounds %struct.buffer_t, > %struct.buffer_t* %error_op_pcmpeqq_272.buffer, i64 0, i32 1 > %23 = bitcast i8** %buf_host181 to double** > %error_op_pcmpeqq_272.host226227232 = load double*, double** %23, align 8 > %24 = icmp eq %struct.buffer_t* %error_op_pcmpeqq_272.buffer, null > br i1 %24, label %&...

...ng for each particular test. > > Also, just looking quickly at one IR I'm surprised by things like: >> >> "assert succeeded165": ; preds = %"assert >> succeeded146" >> %buf_host181 = getelementptr inbounds %struct.buffer_t, >> %struct.buffer_t* %error_op_pcmpeqq_272.buffer, i64 0, i32 1 >> %23 = bitcast i8** %buf_host181 to double** >> %error_op_pcmpeqq_272.host226227232 = load double*, double** %23, align >> 8 >> %24 = icmp eq %struct.buffer_t* %error_op_pcmpeqq_272.buffer, null &...

...ot/dovecot-1.2.12/src/lib-storage/index//index-storage.c:475 storage = (struct mail_storage *) 0x11 box = (struct mailbox *) 0x0 dir_gid = -1 origin = 0x15b140 "/var/mail/chrisho" dir_origin = 0x15b140 "/var/mail/chrisho" buffer = (buffer_t *) 0x0 buffer = (buffer_t *) 0x1615c8 #5 0x00064ad8 in mbox_alloc_mailbox (storage=0x3164c, index=0x1606d0, name=0x11f8e8 "INBOX", path=0x15b140 "/var/mail/chrisho", flags=0) at /usr/local/src/dovecot/dovecot-1.2.12/src/lib-storage/index/mbox//mbox-storage.c:608...

...I don't even know if the patch I wrote actually works (I don't program in C, but gave it a shot anyway) but below is the patch. --- a/src/lib-ssl-iostream/iostream-openssl-params.c +++ b/src/lib-ssl-iostream/iostream-openssl-params.c @@ -13,13 +13,21 @@ generate_dh_parameters(int bitsize, buffer_t *output, const char **error_r) { DH *dh; unsigned char *p; - int len, len2; + int len, len2, success; +#if OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER >= 0x00908000L + success = DH_generate_parameters_ex(dh, bitsize, DH_GENERATOR, NULL); +#else dh = DH_generate_parameters(bitsize, DH_GENERATOR, NULL,...

...gt;> >>>> Also, just looking quickly at one IR I'm surprised by things like: >>>> >>>> "assert succeeded165": ; preds = %"assert succeeded146" >>>> %buf_host181 = getelementptr inbounds %struct.buffer_t, %struct.buffer_t* %error_op_pcmpeqq_272.buffer, i64 0, i32 1 >>>> %23 = bitcast i8** %buf_host181 to double** >>>> %error_op_pcmpeqq_272.host226227232 = load double*, double** %23, align 8 >>>> %24 = icmp eq %struct.buffer_t* %error_op_pcmpeqq_272.buffer,...

...r->offset); + string_t *str; + + if (unicode) + len /= sizeof(ucs2le_t); + + str = t_str_new(len); while (len-- > 0) { str_append_c(str, *p & 0x7f); - p += sizeof(ucs2le_t); + p += unicode ? sizeof(ucs2le_t) : 1; } return str_c(str); } -static unsigned int append_string(buffer_t *buf, const char *str, int ucase) +static unsigned int append_string(buffer_t *buf, const char *str, + int ucase, int unicode) { unsigned int length = 0; for ( ; *str; str++) { buffer_append_c(buf, ucase ? toupper(*str) : *str); - buffer_append_c(buf, 0); - length += sizeof(ucs2le...

...t; > > like: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "assert succeeded165": ; preds = %"assert succeeded146" > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > %buf_host181 = getelementptr inbounds %struct.buffer_t, > > > > > %struct.buffer_t* %error_op_pcmpeqq_272.buffer, i64 0, i32 1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > %23 = bitcast i8** %buf_host181 to double** > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > %error_op_...

...> > -- > Mehdi > > > > > > Also, just looking quickly at one IR I'm surprised by things like: > > "assert succeeded165": ; preds = %"assert succeeded146" > %buf_host181 = getelementptr inbounds %struct.buffer_t, %struct.buffer_t* %error_op_pcmpeqq_272.buffer, i64 0, i32 1 > %23 = bitcast i8** %buf_host181 to double** > %error_op_pcmpeqq_272.host226227232 = load double*, double** %23, align 8 > %24 = icmp eq %struct.buffer_t* %error_op_pcmpeqq_272.buffer, null > br i1 %24, label %"...

...t; > >> >> Also, just looking quickly at one IR I'm surprised by things like: >>> >>> "assert succeeded165": ; preds = %"assert >>> succeeded146" >>> %buf_host181 = getelementptr inbounds %struct.buffer_t, >>> %struct.buffer_t* %error_op_pcmpeqq_272.buffer, i64 0, i32 1 >>> %23 = bitcast i8** %buf_host181 to double** >>> %error_op_pcmpeqq_272.host226227232 = load double*, double** %23, >>> align 8 >>> %24 = icmp eq %struct.buffer_t* %error_op_pcmpeq...

...>> >> >> >> >> Also, just looking quickly at one IR I'm surprised by things like: >> >> "assert succeeded165": ; preds = %"assert succeeded146" >> %buf_host181 = getelementptr inbounds %struct.buffer_t, %struct.buffer_t* %error_op_pcmpeqq_272.buffer, i64 0, i32 1 >> %23 = bitcast i8** %buf_host181 to double** >> %error_op_pcmpeqq_272.host226227232 = load double*, double** %23, align 8 >> %24 = icmp eq %struct.buffer_t* %error_op_pcmpeqq_272.buffer, null >> br i1 %2...

...0 +++ dovecot-1.0-test52/src/auth/mech-ntlm.c 2004-11-10 16:45:53.000000000 +0300 @@ -42,10 +42,15 @@ lm_credentials_callback(const char *cred const unsigned char *client_response; unsigned char lm_response[LM_RESPONSE_SIZE]; unsigned char hash[LM_HASH_SIZE]; + unsigned int response_length; buffer_t *hash_buffer; int ret; - if (credentials == NULL) { + response_length = + ntlmssp_buffer_length(request->response, lm_response); + client_response = ntlmssp_buffer_data(request->response, lm_response); + + if ((credentials == NULL) || (response_length < LM_RESPONSE_SIZE)) { mech_au...

...pool, &p, end, &auth->user_response); + if (len != RPA_UCHALLENGE_LEN) { + *error = "invalid user response"; + return FALSE; + } + + if (p != end) { + *error = "unneeded data found"; + return FALSE; + } + + return TRUE; +} + +static void +buffer_append_asn1_length(buffer_t *buf, unsigned int length) +{ + if (length < 0x80) { + buffer_append_c(buf, length); + } else if (length < 0x100) { + buffer_append_c(buf, 0x81); + buffer_append_c(buf, length); + } else { + buffer_append_c(buf, 0x82); + buffer_append_c(buf, length >> 8); + buffer_append_c(buf, le...

Building on Solaris 8 with Sun's compiler, I get the following error. Would you fix this? Using gcc is not really a good option for me. /opt/forte8/SUNWspro/bin/cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I/opt/csw/inclu\de -fast -xarch=v8 -I/opt/csw/include -c buffer.c "buffer.c", line 159: void function cannot return value "buffer.c", line 205: void function cannot return

> On Feb 29, 2016, at 11:16 AM, Alina Sbirlea via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > All, > > To get the discussion going in a focused manner, here is an initial patch with a running test. The test is from the Halide suite and is checking the correctness of several simd operations. > (Notes: the patch is large due to the number of operations being tested;

..._first_message; - unsigned char salt[16]; - unsigned char salted_password[SHA1_RESULTLEN]; + const char *snonce; /* received: */ const char *gs2_cbind_flag; const char *cnonce; - const char *snonce; const char *client_first_message_bare; const char *client_final_message_without_proof; buffer_t *proof; + + /* stored */ + buffer_t *stored_key; + buffer_t *server_key; }; -static void Hi(const unsigned char *str, size_t str_size, - const unsigned char *salt, size_t salt_size, unsigned int i, - unsigned char result[SHA1_RESULTLEN]) -{ - struct hmac_context ctx; - unsigned cha...

Add OTP parity table. diff -urdpNX /usr/share/dontdiff -x Makefile dovecot.vanilla/src/lib-otp/otp-parity.c dovecot/src/lib-otp/otp-parity.c --- dovecot.vanilla/src/lib-otp/otp-parity.c 1970-01-01 03:00:00.000000000 +0300 +++ dovecot/src/lib-otp/otp-parity.c 2006-06-23 13:44:31.161891112 +0400 @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@ +/* + * OTP parity table. + * + * Copyright (c) 2006 Andrey Panin <pazke at

All, To get the discussion going in a focused manner, here is an initial patch with a running test. The test is from the Halide suite and is checking the correctness of several simd operations. (Notes: the patch is large due to the number of operations being tested; I expect a lot of changes before actually landing it, this is simply to continue the discussion using a concrete example.)

...request = (struct auth_request *) 0xffffffff list = (char **) 0x3c006414 name = 0x0 arg = 0x0 initial_resp = 0xcfbefe38 "X???8?\036\n\001" initial_resp_data = (void *) 0xcfbefecc initial_resp_len = 0 id = 1006715072 buf = (buffer_t *) 0x3c014080 valid_client_cert = 0 #1 0x1c00570f in auth_client_input_auth (conn=0x0, args=0x8b824024 "") at auth-client-connection.c:196 mech = (struct mech_module *) 0x5 request = (struct auth_request *) 0x1 list = (char **) 0xa1efc38 name =...