search for: bufapi

...ously to apply this > > > patch) or both batching sizes the same. > > > > > > I've checked that vhost process (and pktgen) goes 100% cpu also. > > > > > > For tx: Batching decrements always the performance, in all cases. Not > > > sure why bufapi made things better the last time. > > > > > > Batching makes improvements until 64 bufs, I see increments of pps but like 1%. > > > > > > For rx: Batching always improves performance. It seems that if we > > > batch little, bufapi decreases performance...

...ng, like previously to apply this >>> patch) or both batching sizes the same. >>> >>> I've checked that vhost process (and pktgen) goes 100% cpu also. >>> >>> For tx: Batching decrements always the performance, in all cases. Not >>> sure why bufapi made things better the last time. >>> >>> Batching makes improvements until 64 bufs, I see increments of pps but like 1%. >>> >>> For rx: Batching always improves performance. It seems that if we >>> batch little, bufapi decreases performance, but beyond...

...ther only > vhost_net batching (in base testing, like previously to apply this > patch) or both batching sizes the same. > > I've checked that vhost process (and pktgen) goes 100% cpu also. > > For tx: Batching decrements always the performance, in all cases. Not > sure why bufapi made things better the last time. > > Batching makes improvements until 64 bufs, I see increments of pps but like 1%. > > For rx: Batching always improves performance. It seems that if we > batch little, bufapi decreases performance, but beyond 64, bufapi is > much better. The buf...

...er only > vhost_net batching (in base testing, like previously to apply this > patch) or both batching sizes the same. > > I've checked that vhost process (and pktgen) goes 100% cpu also. > > For tx: Batching decrements always the performance, in all cases. Not > sure why bufapi made things better the last time. > > Batching makes improvements until 64 bufs, I see increments of pps but like 1%. > > For rx: Batching always improves performance. It seems that if we > batch little, bufapi decreases performance, but beyond 64, bufapi is > much better. The b...

This still causes corruption issues for people so don't try to use in production please. Posting to expedite debugging. This adds infrastructure required for supporting multiple ring formats. The idea is as follows: we convert descriptors to an independent format first, and process that converting to iov later. Used ring is similar: we fetch into an independent struct first, convert that to

This still causes corruption issues for people so don't try to use in production please. Posting to expedite debugging. This adds infrastructure required for supporting multiple ring formats. The idea is as follows: we convert descriptors to an independent format first, and process that converting to iov later. Used ring is similar: we fetch into an independent struct first, convert that to