search for: btrfs_requeue_work

...trfs_workers *workers) put_worker(worker); } spin_unlock_irq(&workers->lock); - return 0; } /* @@ -618,14 +616,14 @@ found: * it was taken from. It is intended for use with long running work functions * that make some progress and want to give the cpu up for others. */ -int btrfs_requeue_work(struct btrfs_work *work) +void btrfs_requeue_work(struct btrfs_work *work) { struct btrfs_worker_thread *worker = work->worker; unsigned long flags; int wake = 0; if (test_and_set_bit(WORK_QUEUED_BIT, &work->flags)) - goto out; + return; spin_lock_irqsave(&worker->...

...lia@diku.dk> --- fs/btrfs/async-thread.c | 4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c b/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c index 6e4f6c5..019e8af 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c @@ -424,11 +424,11 @@ int btrfs_requeue_work(struct btrfs_work *work) * list */ if (worker->idle) { - spin_lock_irqsave(&worker->workers->lock, flags); + spin_lock(&worker->workers->lock); worker->idle = 0; list_move_tail(&worker->worker_list, &worker->workers->worker_list)...

Hi all - Here''s my current error handling patchset, against 3.1-rc8. Almost all of this patchset is preparing for actual error handling. Before we start in on that work, I''m trying to reduce the surface we need to worry about. It turns out that there is a ton of code that returns an error code but never actually reports an error. The patchset has grown to 65 patches. 46 of them