search for: btrfs_inspect_logical_resolv

...n is that if we don't do this then we end > up pushing parsing to every consumer of libguestfs. I'll redo these two. > > > New API: btrfs_inspect_rootid > > New API: btrfs_inspect_subvolid_resolve > > New API: btrfs_inspect_inode_resolve > > New API: btrfs_inspect_logical_resolve > > In my version of btrfs, 'btrfs inspect' does not exist, but 'btrfs > inspect-internal' does exist. This appears to indicate that these > APIs are for internal use and not general consumption. But I'm no > expert -- if you can point to some official btrfs i...

...rfs_scrub and btrfs_balance completes too early before we can test btrfs_scrub_cancel, btrfs_scrub_resume, btrfs_scrub_status, btrfs_balance_pause, btrfs_balance_cancel, btrfs_balance_resume and btrfs_balance_status. - can't determine a valid logical address for test btrfs_inspect_logical_resolve. Thank you very much for review! Regards, Hu Hu Tao (16): New API: btrfs_scrub New API: btrfs_scrub_cancel New API: btrfs_scrub_resume btrfs: replace "btrfs filesystem balance" with "btrfs balance" New API: btrfs_balance_pause New API: btrfs_balance_cancel Ne...

...te the output of the commands into structures. The reason is that if we don't do this then we end up pushing parsing to every consumer of libguestfs. > New API: btrfs_inspect_rootid > New API: btrfs_inspect_subvolid_resolve > New API: btrfs_inspect_inode_resolve > New API: btrfs_inspect_logical_resolve In my version of btrfs, 'btrfs inspect' does not exist, but 'btrfs inspect-internal' does exist. This appears to indicate that these APIs are for internal use and not general consumption. But I'm no expert -- if you can point to some official btrfs information which says tha...

...> > up pushing parsing to every consumer of libguestfs. > > I'll redo these two. > > > > > > New API: btrfs_inspect_rootid > > > New API: btrfs_inspect_subvolid_resolve > > > New API: btrfs_inspect_inode_resolve > > > New API: btrfs_inspect_logical_resolve > > > > In my version of btrfs, 'btrfs inspect' does not exist, but 'btrfs > > inspect-internal' does exist. This appears to indicate that these > > APIs are for internal use and not general consumption. But I'm no > > expert -- if you can point...