search for: btrfs_inspect_inode_resolv

...of the commands > into structures. The reason is that if we don't do this then we end > up pushing parsing to every consumer of libguestfs. I'll redo these two. > > > New API: btrfs_inspect_rootid > > New API: btrfs_inspect_subvolid_resolve > > New API: btrfs_inspect_inode_resolve > > New API: btrfs_inspect_logical_resolve > > In my version of btrfs, 'btrfs inspect' does not exist, but 'btrfs > inspect-internal' does exist. This appears to indicate that these > APIs are for internal use and not general consumption. But I'm no >...

...API: btrfs_balance_resume New API: btrfs_balance_status New API: btrfs_scrub_status New API: add btrfs_filesystem_defragment New API: add btrfs_rescue_chunk_recover New API: add btrfs_rescue_super_recover New API: btrfs_inspect_rootid New API: btrfs_inspect_subvolid_resolve New API: btrfs_inspect_inode_resolve New API: btrfs_inspect_logical_resolve daemon/btrfs.c | 519 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- generator/actions.ml | 198 ++++++++++++++++++++ gobject/Makefile.inc | 4 +- java/Makefile.inc | 2 +- po/POTFILES | 1 + src/MAX_PROC_NR | 2 +- 6 f...

...9;s better (although a huge pain) to translate the output of the commands into structures. The reason is that if we don't do this then we end up pushing parsing to every consumer of libguestfs. > New API: btrfs_inspect_rootid > New API: btrfs_inspect_subvolid_resolve > New API: btrfs_inspect_inode_resolve > New API: btrfs_inspect_logical_resolve In my version of btrfs, 'btrfs inspect' does not exist, but 'btrfs inspect-internal' does exist. This appears to indicate that these APIs are for internal use and not general consumption. But I'm no expert -- if you can point to...

...The reason is that if we don't do this then we end > > up pushing parsing to every consumer of libguestfs. > > I'll redo these two. > > > > > > New API: btrfs_inspect_rootid > > > New API: btrfs_inspect_subvolid_resolve > > > New API: btrfs_inspect_inode_resolve > > > New API: btrfs_inspect_logical_resolve > > > > In my version of btrfs, 'btrfs inspect' does not exist, but 'btrfs > > inspect-internal' does exist. This appears to indicate that these > > APIs are for internal use and not general consumpti...