search for: btrfs_evict_node

When adding orphans to an inode''s root, we start a transaction for that root that when ended in several places such as for example extent-tree.c:btrfs_remove_block_group(), inode.c:btrfs_unlink() and inode.c:btrfs_evict_node(), doesn''t result in a commit, that is, inode.c:btrfs_orphan_commit_root() doesn''t get called (via transaction.c:commit_fs_roots()). The respective inode will end up being called by inode.c:btrfs_evict_node() (via the VFS). So my likely dirty hack, after some debugging, of freein...