Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "btrfs_delayed_node".
2011 Sep 23
0
[PATCH] btrfs/delayed-inode.c: quiet sparse noise
...-
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c b/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c
index b52c672..5d3c397 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c
@@ -199,8 +199,8 @@ static void btrfs_dequeue_delayed_node(struct btrfs_delayed_root *root,
spin_unlock(&root->lock);
}
-struct btrfs_delayed_node *btrfs_first_delayed_node(
- struct btrfs_delayed_root *delayed_root)
+static struct btrfs_delayed_node *
+btrfs_first_delayed_node(struct btrfs_delayed_root *delayed_root)
{
struct list_head *p;
struct btrfs_delayed_node *node = NULL;
@@ -218,8 +218,8 @@ out:
return node;
}
-struct btr...
2013 Nov 19
5
xenwatch: page allocation failure: order:4, mode:0x10c0d0 xen_netback:xenvif_alloc: Could not allocate netdev for vif16.0
...0 0 88 46
gfs2_inode 0 0 1280 25
gfs2_glock(aspace) 0 0 960 17
gfs2_glock 0 0 592 27
btrfs_delayed_data_ref 0 0 96 42
btrfs_delayed_ref_head 0 0 232 17
btrfs_delayed_node 0 0 392 20
btrfs_ordered_extent 0 0 472 17
btrfs_extent_buffer 0 0 568 28
btrfs_delalloc_work 0 0 184 22
btrfs_path 0 0 144 28
btrfs_transaction 0 0 600 27...
2012 Aug 01
7
[PATCH] Btrfs: barrier before waitqueue_active
...;items) < BTRFS_DELAYED_BACKGROUND) {
+ smp_mb();
+ if (waitqueue_active(&delayed_root->wait))
+ wake_up(&delayed_root->wait);
+ }
}
static void btrfs_release_delayed_item(struct btrfs_delayed_item *item)
@@ -1057,9 +1059,11 @@ static void btrfs_release_delayed_inode(struct btrfs_delayed_node *delayed_node)
delayed_root = delayed_node->root->fs_info->delayed_root;
atomic_dec(&delayed_root->items);
if (atomic_read(&delayed_root->items) <
- BTRFS_DELAYED_BACKGROUND &&
- waitqueue_active(&delayed_root->wait))
- wake_up(&dela...
2012 Nov 15
3
Likely mem leak in 3.7
Starting with 3.7 rc1, my workstation seems to loose ram.
Up until (and including) 3.6, used-(buffers+cached) was roughly the same
as sum(rss) (taking shared into account). Now there is an approx 6G gap.
When the box first starts, it is clearly less swappy than with <= 3.6; I
can''t tell whether that is related. The reduced swappiness persists.
It seems to get worse when I update
2013 Apr 19
14
[GIT PULL] (xen) stable/for-jens-3.10
Hey Jens,
Please in your spare time (if there is such a thing at a conference)
pull this branch:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/konrad/xen.git stable/for-jens-3.10
for your v3.10 branch. Sorry for being so late with this.
<blurb>
It has the ''feature-max-indirect-segments'' implemented in both backend
and frontend. The current problem with the backend and
2012 Jun 21
0
[RFC PATCH V2] Btrfs: introduce extent buffer cache for each i-node
...19 +-
fs/btrfs/xattr.c | 2 +-
15 files changed, 577 insertions(+), 192 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/btrfs_inode.h b/fs/btrfs/btrfs_inode.h
index 12394a9..9912575 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/btrfs_inode.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/btrfs_inode.h
@@ -162,6 +162,9 @@ struct btrfs_inode {
struct btrfs_delayed_node *delayed_node;
+ struct extent_buffer *fs_eb;
+ struct extent_buffer *log_eb;
+
struct inode vfs_inode;
};
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
index 15cbc2b..4e8c12f 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
@@ -989,6 +989,9 @@ static noinline int __btrfs_cow_block(st...
2012 Apr 20
44
Ceph on btrfs 3.4rc
After running ceph on XFS for some time, I decided to try btrfs again.
Performance with the current "for-linux-min" branch and big metadata
is much better. The only problem (?) I''m still seeing is a warning
that seems to occur from time to time:
[87703.784552] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[87703.789759] WARNING: at fs/btrfs/inode.c:2103