Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "btrfs_build_version".
2012 Oct 16
0
[PATCH] btrfs-progs: add -V description in print_usage
...llocation\n");
fprintf(stderr, "\t -r --rootdir the source directory\n");
fprintf(stderr, "\t -K --nodiscard do not perform whole device TRIM\n");
+ fprintf(stderr, "\t -V --version Print the mkfs.btrfs version and exit\n");
fprintf(stderr, "%s\n", BTRFS_BUILD_VERSION);
exit(1);
}
--
1.7.5.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
2013 May 16
0
[PATCH] btrfs-progs: mkfs: add -O option to specify fs features
...rintf(stderr, "\t -K --nodiscard do not perform whole device TRIM\n");
+ fprintf(stderr, "\t -O --features comma separated list of filesystem features\n");
fprintf(stderr, "\t -V --version print the mkfs.btrfs version and exit\n");
fprintf(stderr, "%s\n", BTRFS_BUILD_VERSION);
exit(1);
@@ -397,6 +398,7 @@ static struct option long_options[] = {
{ "version", 0, NULL, ''V'' },
{ "rootdir", 1, NULL, ''r'' },
{ "nodiscard", 0, NULL, ''K'' },
+ { "features", 0, NULL, ''O&...
2013 Mar 15
0
[PATCH] Btrfs: add some free space cache tests
...ache.h"
#define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
#include <trace/events/btrfs.h>
@@ -1738,6 +1739,10 @@ static int __init init_btrfs_fs(void)
btrfs_init_lockdep();
+#ifdef CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_RUN_SANITY_TESTS
+ btrfs_test_free_space_cache();
+#endif
+
printk(KERN_INFO "%s loaded\n", BTRFS_BUILD_VERSION);
return 0;
--
1.7.7.6
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
2013 Apr 15
8
[PATCH] btrfs-progs: No-op when called as fsck.btrfsck
Hi,
I thought that I would attempt a quick little patch that will make btrfsck into
a No-op when called as fsck.btrfsck.
The reasoning is that the FAQ states that it is recommended and safe to do so,
and the current 12.04 version of Ubuntu just symlinks fsck.btrfsck to btrfsck
instead of /bin/true.
PS - Apologies if I mess this git send-email up!
Dan McGrath (1):
btrfs-progs: No-op when
2013 Jan 29
8
[RFC] Move btrfsck in to the btrfs command
NOTE: in order to apply this patch you should:
git mv btrfsck.c cmd-fsck.c
This patch moves btrfsck in to "btrfs fsck".
It also adds support for symlinks to the btrfs binary to
retain compablity, =)
I think something should be done to the help description but i''m not
sure what... Anyway, feedback is welcome.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
2013 Mar 15
0
[PATCH] Btrfs-progs: add skinny metadata support to progs V3
...fprintf(stderr, "\t -K --nodiscard do not perform whole device TRIM\n");
fprintf(stderr, "\t -V --version print the mkfs.btrfs version and exit\n");
+ fprintf(stderr, "\t -x --skinny-extents use the new skinny extent disk format");
fprintf(stderr, "%s\n", BTRFS_BUILD_VERSION);
exit(1);
}
@@ -395,6 +396,7 @@ static struct option long_options[] = {
{ "version", 0, NULL, ''V'' },
{ "rootdir", 1, NULL, ''r'' },
{ "nodiscard", 0, NULL, ''K'' },
+ { "skinny-extents", 0, NULL, ...
2011 Oct 04
68
[patch 00/65] Error handling patchset v3
Hi all -
Here''s my current error handling patchset, against 3.1-rc8. Almost all of
this patchset is preparing for actual error handling. Before we start in
on that work, I''m trying to reduce the surface we need to worry about. It
turns out that there is a ton of code that returns an error code but never
actually reports an error.
The patchset has grown to 65 patches. 46 of them