Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "btree_extent_io_op".
Did you mean:
btree_extent_io_ops
2010 Dec 01
2
[RFC PATCH 4/4 v2] Btrfs: deal with filesystem state at mount, umount
...fs/disk-io.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
index b40dfe4..663d360 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
@@ -43,6 +43,8 @@
static struct extent_io_ops btree_extent_io_ops;
static void end_workqueue_fn(struct btrfs_work *work);
static void free_fs_root(struct btrfs_root *root);
+static void btrfs_check_super_valid(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
+ int read_only);
/*
* end_io_wq structs are used to do processing in task context when an IO is
@@ -1700,6...
2011 Jun 10
6
[PATCH v2 0/6] btrfs: generic readeahead interface
This series introduces a generic readahead interface for btrfs trees.
The intention is to use it to speed up scrub in a first run, but balance
is another hot candidate. In general, every tree walk could be accompanied
by a readahead. Deletion of large files comes to mind, where the fetching
of the csums takes most of the time.
Also the initial build-ups of free-space-caches and
2011 Jun 29
14
[PATCH v4 0/6] btrfs: generic readeahead interface
This series introduces a generic readahead interface for btrfs trees.
The intention is to use it to speed up scrub in a first run, but balance
is another hot candidate. In general, every tree walk could be accompanied
by a readahead. Deletion of large files comes to mind, where the fetching
of the csums takes most of the time.
Also the initial build-ups of free-space-caches and