search for: btree_extent_io_op

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "btree_extent_io_op".

Did you mean: btree_extent_io_ops
2010 Dec 01
2
[RFC PATCH 4/4 v2] Btrfs: deal with filesystem state at mount, umount
...fs/disk-io.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c index b40dfe4..663d360 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c @@ -43,6 +43,8 @@ static struct extent_io_ops btree_extent_io_ops; static void end_workqueue_fn(struct btrfs_work *work); static void free_fs_root(struct btrfs_root *root); +static void btrfs_check_super_valid(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, + int read_only); /* * end_io_wq structs are used to do processing in task context when an IO is @@ -1700,6...
2011 Jun 10
6
[PATCH v2 0/6] btrfs: generic readeahead interface
This series introduces a generic readahead interface for btrfs trees. The intention is to use it to speed up scrub in a first run, but balance is another hot candidate. In general, every tree walk could be accompanied by a readahead. Deletion of large files comes to mind, where the fetching of the csums takes most of the time. Also the initial build-ups of free-space-caches and
2011 Jun 29
14
[PATCH v4 0/6] btrfs: generic readeahead interface
This series introduces a generic readahead interface for btrfs trees. The intention is to use it to speed up scrub in a first run, but balance is another hot candidate. In general, every tree walk could be accompanied by a readahead. Deletion of large files comes to mind, where the fetching of the csums takes most of the time. Also the initial build-ups of free-space-caches and