Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "bsvc".
Did you mean:
bsc
2012 Feb 14
1
cross validation in rvm not working? (kernlab package)
...ackage
has an argument 'cross' with which you can perform k-fold cross validation.
However, when I try to add a 10-fold cross validation I get the following error message:
Error in match.arg(type, c("C-svc", "nu-svc", "kbb-svc", "spoc-svc", "C-bsvc", :
'arg' should be one of ?C-svc?, ?nu-svc?, ?kbb-svc?, ?spoc-svc?, ?C-bsvc?, ?one-svc?, ?eps-svr?, ?eps-bsvr?, ?nu-svr?
code-example:
# create data
x <- seq(-20,20,0.1)
y <- sin(x)/x + rnorm(401,sd=0.05)
# train relevance vector machine
foo <- rvm(x, y, cross=10)
S...
2010 Sep 24
0
kernlab:ksvm:eps-svr: bug?
...quot;prefixed" numbers in
ksvm_eps-svr.txt)
(you may also refer to the trace_output in parallel)
1. the given response vector, y, is standardized at line 143:
142 if (is.numeric(y)&&(type(ret)!="C-svc"&&type(ret)!="nu-svc"&&type(ret)!="C-bsvc"&&type(ret)!="spoc-svc"&&type(ret)!="kbb-svc"))
{
143 y <- scale(y)
144 y.scale <- attributes(y)[c("scaled:center","scaled:scale")]
145 y <- as.vector(y)
146 }
2. fitted response, fitted(ret), is ob...
2011 Nov 08
1
Single-disk rpool with inconsistent checksums, import fails
...failure,
so this might be its leftovers.
* It had also output this line:
block traversal size 11986202624 != alloc 11986203136 (unreachable 512)
I believe this refers to the allocated data size in bytes,
and that one sector (512b) is deemed unreachable. Is that
so fatal?
2) "zdb -bsvc -e <rpool-GUID>" showed that there are some
consistency problems. Namely, five blocks had mismatching
checksums. They were named "plain file" blocks with no
further details (like what files they might be parts of).
But I hope that this means no metadata was hurt so far.
3) I...