Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "brlcad".
Did you mean:
brad
2013 Aug 17
1
[LLVMdev] [brlcad-devel] Clang vs. gcc for building BRL-CAD
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 7:08 AM, Tom Browder <tom.browder at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 6:15 AM, Tom Browder <tom.browder at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Tom Browder <tom.browder at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Tom Browder <tom.browder at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
2013 Aug 17
0
[LLVMdev] [brlcad-devel] Clang vs. gcc for building BRL-CAD
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 6:15 AM, Tom Browder <tom.browder at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Tom Browder <tom.browder at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Tom Browder <tom.browder at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> ...
>>>
>> I'll see if I can try it with gcc 4.7 soon.
>>>
>>
> I
2013 Aug 17
2
[LLVMdev] [brlcad-devel] Clang vs. gcc for building BRL-CAD
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Tom Browder <tom.browder at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Tom Browder <tom.browder at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> ...
>>
> I'll see if I can try it with gcc 4.7 soon.
>>
>
I haven't been able to build gcc 4.7.3 yet (prereq ppl build problems--I
think that's why I stopped building gcc some time
2013 Aug 13
2
[LLVMdev] creating new llvm project?
On Aug 13, 2013, at 4:51 AM, David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote:
> Getting CMake up to the standard where it supports a superset of what autoconf supports is required for dropping autoconf
Is there a list somewhere of what autoconf supports that CMake does not (and that people care about)? It could be that people simply don't know what's missing since, as you