Displaying 20 results from an estimated 305 matches for "brittleness".
2018 Dec 04
2
[cfe-dev] RFC: Supported Optimizations attribute
On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 2:24 PM John McCall via cfe-dev <
cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> On 4 Dec 2018, at 13:16, Sanjoy Das wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 11:49 PM John McCall jmccall at apple.com wrote:
>
> Piotr's proposal unfortunately doesn't give us a good name for the class
> of optimizations that require being listed in supported_optimizations.
>
2006 Aug 11
0
pimp my code?? Using self.new in class methods, brittle design & testing such methods
It''s way past midnight and I''m about to go to sleep. I''m having
doubts about my code now that I''m trying to test as I go.
Now my model follows the pattern of the LineItem model in the rails book.
Basically the User has one Group and this one Group has many Friends
(polymorphic two-way as "befriender" and "befriended"--users).
from
2006 Jul 19
1
Testing the flash is brittle?
Hello all,
I seem to have an annoying habit of realizing that I''ve asked a
question with a blindingly obvious answer just after I''ve asked it
but here goes.
I''ve noticed that in my functional tests there''s the occasional
reliance on the contents of the flash. For example, I have an action
that confirms a users identity and may reject them because
A)
2006 May 03
1
brittle IAX connections ?
Hello,
I have several asterisk 1.2.7.1 servers connected through iax2 and often
the local asterisk would no longer see the remote one, even thought the
link is high quality and the ping is perfect.
Is there some issues to take into account about IAX2 connections?
Is asterisk's DNS resolution too fragile and should I use raw IP's in my
configs?
Thanks for any help (I'm in hot
2013 Nov 28
2
Dovecot's brittle configuration syntax
Hi there,
Whilst trying to come up with a minimal configuration for Dovecot:
http://dabase.com/blog/Minimal_Dovecot/
I noticed the configuration syntax is a bit admin unfriendly. It's easy
to get an infamous Error code 89.
Is there any back story to the grammar or language this configuration is
in?
Kind regards,
2006 May 31
2
calling routing during a functional test
I had a beginner''s question. I am testing the create action on my
controller. I wanted to fetch the ID parameter of the newly created
object, so that I can make some assertions on it.
But I can''t seem to find an elegant way of doing that. Of course, might
create action redirects. That means that @response.redirect_url is
something like "/show/8". So I could pluck
2006 Jan 14
11
nuby: do models have to inherit directly from ActiveRecord?
Hello,
I have a few models -- book, cd, dvd -- for which I''d like to have an
abstract base superclass to hold some common stuff. That abstract class, I
was thinking, would inherit from ActiveRecord.
Didn''t work, though, and looking around, I found this:
<http://wiki.rubyonrails.com/rails/pages/HowtoMakeAbstractModel>
2010 Aug 21
8
ZFS with Equallogic storage
I''m planning on setting up an NFS server for our ESXi hosts and plan on using a virtualized Solaris or Nexenta host to serve ZFS over NFS.
The storage I have available is provided by Equallogic boxes over 10Gbe iSCSI.
I am trying to figure out the best way to provide both performance and resiliency given the Equallogic provides the redundancy.
Since I am hoping to provide a 2TB
2008 Mar 04
9
What is your workflow? Or how to use the story runner the right way.
I really would like to know how people are using the Story and Example
runner to write their software.It would be great to get some direction on
it, because I think I''m missing some points.
Taking the outside-in approach in thought:
At first we write a high-level customer-facing story, this story fails.
Then we start using mocks at object level to use them as a design tool,
and so we
2018 Dec 04
4
RFC: Supported Optimizations attribute
On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 11:49 PM John McCall <jmccall at apple.com> wrote:
> Piotr's proposal unfortunately doesn't give us a good name for the class
> of optimizations that require being listed in supported_optimizations.
> In earlier discussions I called them "brittle", but I can understand why
> nobody wants to call their optimization that, so let's call
2004 Sep 01
2
zaphfc crashes Linux
Hi all,
I'm having serious problem getting zaphfc to work on my box. I d/l'd
bri-stuff-0.1.0RC3/RC4a and followed the instructions to the dot.
Everything builds fine. But, when 'make load' the whole machine will
freeze. Anyone had the same problem and managed to solve it? I'm using a
Billion HFC PCI card on Trustix 2.0 running kernel 2.4.26.
As a side note, I feel that
2007 Mar 05
4
When to stub/when to mock (was Rails functional testing and Mocha)
Hi James,
> From: James Mead <jamesmead44 at gmail.com>
> Date: Mar 5, 2007 5:15 AM
> Subject: Re: [mocha-developer] Rails functional testing and Mocha
> To: mocha-developer at rubyforge.org
> "I''d probably stub the call to find not expect it, because its a query not a command"
I have a different perspective on when to use stubs and when to use
mocks and
2006 Nov 25
2
Comparison between RSpec and test/unit
I''m curious, Christian Neukirchen has released test/unit[1] that seems
to mirror much of RSpec, but built on Test::Unit, so in some ways less
brittle from a Rails-integration perspective, and also allowing you to
mix the two together as appropriate.
So, has anyone made an informed comparison? I''m new enough that I
don''t really know the finer points yet. The syntax is
2007 Jun 02
7
I''m really bad at controllers, help please.
Hey,
Sorry for so many questions - I''m really bad at this right now.
I''m trying to cover the following code w/ rspec
def index
if params[:user_id]
@user = User.find(params[:user_id])
@messages = @user.messages
end
end
So basically what I''m doing is listing all the messages for a user,
provided there is an id parameter.
describe
2018 Aug 06
2
[PATCH] D50328: [X86][SSE] Combine (some) target shuffles with multiple uses
[NOTE: Removed Phab and reviewers]
> ================
> Comment at: test/CodeGen/X86/2012-01-12-extract-sv.ll:12
> +; CHECK-NEXT: vblendps {{.*#+}} xmm1 = xmm1[0],xmm2[1,2,3]
> +; CHECK-NEXT: vpermilps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,0,0,0]
> ; CHECK-NEXT: vinsertf128 $1, %xmm0, %ymm0, %ymm0
> ----------------
> greened wrote:
>> Can we make this test less brittle by
2018 Aug 08
2
[PATCH] D50328: [X86][SSE] Combine (some) target shuffles with multiple uses
Simon Pilgrim <llvm-dev at redking.me.uk> writes:
> Changing a test's IR to avoid an issue in a patch is very problematic,
> but if any test's codegen changes because of a patch then it just
> needs to be reviewed, preferably by someone who has touched that test
> in the past.
But wouldn't it be even better if that output didn't need to be changed
at all and
2013 Aug 21
2
Build problems: klibc with Linux 3.10.7
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 01:39:50PM +0200, leroy christophe wrote:
>
> Le 21/08/2013 12:20, maximilian attems a ?crit :
> >On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 07:44:39AM +0200, leroy christophe wrote:
> >>Find attached two patches I have in order to build klibc 2.0.2
> >>against kernel 3.8.13
> >>We had to introduce those patches when going from kernel 3.6 to kernel 3.7
2018 Dec 26
2
avoiding PCI bus 8 / using PCI function / virt-install
I’m using virt-install to spin up VMs. At times I have a need to spin up
VMs which have 100s of interfaces. I ran into the PCI issue mentioned in
this previous thread based on how virt-install assigns PCI addresses to
interfaces:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-users/2018-December/msg00064.html
Using the info mention there I was able to part hand / part sw re-write an
XML where I
2006 Jun 17
3
What is this failure trying to tell me?
Here is my unit test code.
post :login, :user=>{ :login => "bob", :password => "test"}
assert_response :redirect
assert_session_has :user
assert_redirected_to :action => ''welcome''
Here is the failure I''m getting when I run my tests.
2) Failure:
test_login_required(UserControllerTest)
2017 May 01
3
RFC: Stop using redundant PHI node entries for multi-edge predecessors
Today, the IR requires that if you have multiple edges from A to B
(typically with a switch) any phi nodes in B must have an equal number of
entries for A, but that all of them must have the same value.
This seems rather annoying....
1) It creates multiple uses of values in A for no apparently good reason
2) It makes updating PHI nodes using sets of predecessors incredibly hard
3) There is no