Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "bridge3".
Did you mean:
bridge
2007 Mar 26
1
VLan help! :D?
...|VM4 |
|__________ |-----------------bridge2------------------ |Firewall|
____________ |
|
|VM3 |
| |
|__________ |-----------------bridge3------------------ |________|
is one-bridge-per-VLAN
Thanks my so is debian sarge and use Xen 3.0.3 thanks thanks thanks
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
2007 Apr 18
1
[Bridge] device eth0 is already a member of a bridge; can't enslave it to bridge Net6
...Is this a bug or a feature? Why is it not allowed to bind an Interface to t=
wo different bridges? =
Is there a workaround for this issue?
Problem: =
UML1 ---- bridge1 \
eth0 =
UML2 ---- bridge2 /
Workaround?:
UML1 ---- bridge1 \
bridge3 ---- eth0
UML2 ---- bridge2 /
UML1 \
bridge1 ---- eth0
UML2 /
Thanks for your help
Tim Keupen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/bridge/attachments/2005103=
1/891b5183/attachment-0002.htm
2008 Jan 25
2
strange xen memory calculations?
Hi,
I have started the xen kernel with parameter dom0_mem=300M.
xm info | grep total
total_memory : 2045
Name ID Mem VCPUs State Time(s)
Domain-0 0 300 2 r----- 292.1
FTP 822 1 56.7
LDAP 1 822 1 r----- 541.3
NFS1 822 1 14.8
NFS2 822 1 1.4
For the
2018 Aug 08
2
Queue breaks Dynamic_Features on Attended Transfer
On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 1:53 PM, Daniel Journo <dan at keshercommunications.com>
wrote:
> > Prior to a call entering a Queue, I set __DYNAMIC_FEATURES=NewRecordApp.
> > AgentA answers and is able to use that feature code.
> > If AgentA performs an attended transfer of a call from a queue to
> AgentB, the
> > feature code no longer works.
> >
> > It only