search for: brickpath

...sented by a brick within a volume. > This is helpful when a disk goes bad etc > That's what I need, the use case is a disk goes bad on a disperse gluster node and we want to replace it with a new disk > > Start reset process - > > |gluster volume reset-brick VOLNAME HOSTNAME:BRICKPATH start | This works, I can see in gluster volume status the brick is not there anymore > > The above command kills the respective brick process. Now the brick > can be reformatted. > > To restart the brick after modifying configuration - > > |gluster volume reset-brick VOLNAME...

Hi Jorick, 1 - Why would I even need to specify the " HOSTNAME:BRICKPATH " twice? I just want to replace the disk and get it back into the volume. Reset brick command can be used in different scenarios. One more case could be where you just want to change the host name to IP address of that node of bricks. In this case also you will follow the same steps but jus...

I must ask again, just to be sure. Is what you are proposing definitely supported in v3.8? Kind regards, Mitja On 25/02/2018 13:55, Jim Kinney wrote: > gluster volume add-brick volname replica 3 arbiter 1 > brickhost:brickpath/to/new/arbitervol > > Yes. The replica 3 looks odd. Somewhere in 3.12 (?) or not until v4 a > change in command will happen so it won't count the arbiter as a replica. > > On February 25, 2018 5:05:04 AM EST, "Mitja Miheli?" > <mitja.mihelic at arnes.si> wrot...

gluster volume add-brick volname replica 3 arbiter 1 brickhost:brickpath/to/new/arbitervol Yes. The replica 3 looks odd. Somewhere in 3.12 (?) or not until v4 a change in command will happen so it won't count the arbiter as a replica. On February 25, 2018 5:05:04 AM EST, "Mitja Miheli?" <mitja.mihelic at arnes.si> wrote: >Hi! > >I am using...

Hi! I am using GlusterFS on CentOS7 with glusterfs-3.8.15 RPM version. I currently have a replica 2 running and I would like to get rid of the split-brain problem before it occurs. This is one of the possible solutions. Is it possible to and an arbiter to this volume? I have read in a thread from 2016 that this feature is planned for version 3.8. Is the feature available? If so, could you give

...lt;mitja.mihelic at arnes.si> wrote: > > I must ask again, just to be sure. Is what you are proposing definitely supported in v3.8? > > Kind regards, > Mitja > > On 25/02/2018 13:55, Jim Kinney wrote: >> gluster volume add-brick volname replica 3 arbiter 1 brickhost:brickpath/to/new/arbitervol >> >> Yes. The replica 3 looks odd. Somewhere in 3.12 (?) or not until v4 a change in command will happen so it won't count the arbiter as a replica. >> >> On February 25, 2018 5:05:04 AM EST, "Mitja Miheli?" <mitja.mihelic at arnes.si&gt...

Hi, Which version of gluster you are using? You can find which file is that using the following command find <brickpath> -samefile <brickpath/.glusterfs/<first two bits of gfid>/<next 2 bits of gfid>/<full gfid> Please provide the getfatr output of the file which is in split brain. The steps to recover from split-brain can be found here, http://gluster.readthedocs.io/en/latest/Troubleshootin...

...5M 25% /boot 8><--- So the output isnt helping.......... On 23 May 2018 at 00:29, Karthik Subrahmanya <ksubrahm at redhat.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Which version of gluster you are using? > > You can find which file is that using the following command > find <brickpath> -samefile <brickpath/.glusterfs/<first two bits of > gfid>/<next 2 bits of gfid>/<full gfid> > > Please provide the getfatr output of the file which is in split brain. > The steps to recover from split-brain can be found here, > http://gluster.readthedocs.io/...

...lar guest OS type? Or is this something you see for all guest OS? Also, can you get the output of `getfattr -d -m . -e hex <path>` for the following two "paths" from all of the bricks: path to the file representing the vm created off this template wrt the brick. It will usually be $BRICKPATH/xxxx....xx/images/$UUID where $UUID represents the uuid of the vm created from the template. If im not wrong, there would be two sets of a certain UUID2, UUID2.lease, UUID2.meta. Please get me the output of the command above for both the uuid files. The one that has more than 2 hard links is the...

....... > > > > > > > > On 23 May 2018 at 00:29, Karthik Subrahmanya <ksubrahm at redhat.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Which version of gluster you are using? >> >> You can find which file is that using the following command >> find <brickpath> -samefile <brickpath/.glusterfs/<first two bits of >> gfid>/<next 2 bits of gfid>/<full gfid> >> >> Please provide the getfatr output of the file which is in split brain. >> The steps to recover from split-brain can be found here, >> http://glu...

...ter brick and then run the volume heal to do the healing. Follow these steps to resolve the issue: (first try this on one file and check whether it gets healed. If it gets healed then do this for all the remaining files) 1. Get the file path for the gfids you got from heal info output. find <brickpath> -samefile <brickpath/.glusterfs/<first two bits of gfid>/<next 2 bits of gfid>/<full gfid> 2. Do ls/stat on the file from mount. 3. Run volume heal. 4. Check the heal info output to see whether the file got healed. If one file gets healed, then do step 1 & 2 for the re...

Hi All, I have two glusterfs servers and doing the backup of these is very slow, when it does not fail. I have thousand and thousand and thousand files... Apparently the directory .glusterfs has some responsibility for the backup failure. Is necessary to make a backup of the .glusterfs directory? Thanks in advance. -- Cease

Hi Jim, Can you check whether the same hardlinks are present on both the bricks & both of them have the link count 2? If the link count is 2 then "find <brickpath> -samefile <brickpath/.glusterfs/<first two bits of gfid>/<next 2 bits of gfid>/<full gfid>" should give you the file path. Regards, Karthik On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 3:28 AM, Jim Kinney <jim.kinney at gmail.com> wrote: > I'm not so lucky. ALL of mine show...

...h it has no GFID in the .glusterfs structure. On Tue, 2017-10-24 at 12:35 +0530, Karthik Subrahmanya wrote: > Hi Jim, > > Can you check whether the same hardlinks are present on both the > bricks & both of them have the link count 2? > If the link count is 2 then "find <brickpath> -samefile > <brickpath/.glusterfs/<first two > bits of gfid>/<next 2 bits of gfid>/<full gfid>" > should give you the file path. > > Regards, > Karthik > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 3:28 AM, Jim Kinney <jim.kinney at gmail.com> > wrote...

How do I find what "eafb8799-4e7a-4264-9213-26997c5a4693" is? https://docs.gluster.org/en/v3/Troubleshooting/gfid-to-path/ On May 21, 2018 3:22:01 PM PDT, Thing <thing.thing at gmail.com> wrote: >Hi, > >I seem to have a split brain issue, but I cannot figure out where this >is >and what it is, can someone help me pls, I cant find what to fix here. >

Hi, Thank you for your reply. Lindsay, Uunfortunately i do not have backup for this template. Krutika, The stat-prefetch is already disabled on the volume. -- Respectfully Mahdi A. Mahdi ________________________________ From: Krutika Dhananjay <kdhananj at redhat.com> Sent: Friday, October 6, 2017 7:39 AM To: Lindsay Mathieson Cc: Mahdi Adnan; gluster-users at gluster.org Subject: Re:

Let me see if I understand this. Remove attrs from the brick and delete the .glusterfs folder. Data stays in place. Add the brick to the volume. Since most of the data is the same as on the actual volume it does not need to be synced, and the heal operation finishes much faster. Do I have this right? Kind regards, Mitja On 25/02/2018 17:02, Vlad Kopylov wrote: > .gluster and attr already in

...idata2 up for over 300 days. due for reboot. On Tue, 2017-10-24 at 12:35 +0530, Karthik Subrahmanya wrote: > Hi Jim, > > Can you check whether the same hardlinks are present on both the > bricks & both of them have the link count 2? > If the link count is 2 then "find <brickpath> -samefile > <brickpath/.glusterfs/<first two > bits of gfid>/<next 2 bits of gfid>/<full gfid>" > should give you the file path. > > Regards, > Karthik > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 3:28 AM, Jim Kinney <jim.kinney at gmail.com> > wrote...

Could you disable stat-prefetch on the volume and create another vm off that template and see if it works? -Krutika On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 8:28 AM, Lindsay Mathieson < lindsay.mathieson at gmail.com> wrote: > Any chance of a backup you could do bit compare with? > > > > Sent from my Windows 10 phone > > > > *From: *Mahdi Adnan <mahdi.adnan at outlook.com>

...t; > On 26.10.17 07:41, Karthik Subrahmanya wrote: > > HeyRichard, > > > > Could you share the following informations please? > > 1. gluster volume info <volname> > > 2. getfattr output of that file from all the bricks > > getfattr -d -e hex -m . <brickpath/filepath> > > 3. glustershd & glfsheal logs > > > > Regards, > > Karthik > > > > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 10:21 AM, Amar Tumballi <atumball at redhat.com > > <mailto:atumball at redhat.com>> wrote: > > > > On a side note, t...