Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "brianm".
Did you mean:
brian
2011 May 27
1
Help with Rmpi install
...The R package that my predecessor built was version 2.6.1. I have since installed 2.13.0 in an NFS exported shared software directory, and intend for the Rmpi package to be installed there as well.
The compiler is gcc 4.3.3, the mpich version is 1.2.7..7
The install command and its output are:
[brianm at hpc-string R]$ /usr/usc/R/2.13.0/bin/R CMD INSTALL Rmpi_0.5-9.tar.gz --configure-args="--prefix=/usr/usc/R/2.13.0 --with-Rmpi-type=MPICH --with-Rmpi-include=/usr/usc/mpich/default/default/include --with-Rmpi-libpath=/usr/usc/mpich/default/default/lib64 --with-mpi=/usr/usc/mpich/default/defa...
1998 Jun 23
1
DOS Shortcuts in NT
...ys that it cant
find the shortcut.(!) I'm guessing it has something to do with the way
that MS deals with the long file names. Has anyone else run accross the
problem and did you find a solution?
The same shortcuts run on a real NT server regardless of 8.3 paths or
not.
--
Brian McLean brianm@et.byu.edu
Lab / Systems Administrator win95@et.byu.edu
CAEDM / College of Engineering
Brigham Young University CB306a 378-5351
1999 Aug 04
0
Win9x & Samba 2.0.5a
...ox. If a 9x user then uses an
MSDOS window and views the file(s), they are all there. Back-revving
the binaries to 2.0.3 solves the problem. I have also duplicated this
problem on my RH6.0 box at home talking to a 98 box.
Can anyone clue me in as to what might be happening?
--
Brian McLean brianm@et.byu.edu
CAEDM / College of Engineering winnt@et.byu.edu
Brigham Young University CB306a 378-5351
1999 Aug 04
0
Win9x & Samba 2.0.5a (PR#19465)
brianm@et.byu.edu wrote:
>
> We have a system that uses SAMBA on HPUX 10.20 systems as servers and
> primarily NT4 Clients. We do however, have a few 9x boxes. We are
> running with Encryption on the servers, so no modifications are made to
> the registries of either types of windows box...
2007 Jul 19
5
files permission and hidden files are not rsync properly
...il vchkpw 4096 Feb 22 08:17 angilad
drwx------ 3 vpopmail vchkpw 4096 Jul 4 11:48 barbm
drwx------ 3 vpopmail vchkpw 4096 Jul 16 08:00 billj
drwx------ 3 vpopmail vchkpw 4096 Apr 10 11:04 bills
drwx------ 3 vpopmail vchkpw 4096 Sep 18 2006 bonitap
drwx------ 3 vpopmail vchkpw 4096 Feb 23 11:07 brianm
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Permission, ownership and group after rsync
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
drwx------ 38 nobody nobody 4096 Jul 18 15:27 0
drwx------ 6 nobody nobody 4096 Jul 18...
2004 Apr 07
2
Q: --one-file-system and nested file systems
Greetings rsync gurus!
I'm trying to run rsync from machine A to backup files on machine B.
I want the files to be copied into a directory -- /backups/B -- on machine
A and mimic the directory structure on machine B.
Machine B has the following file systems (and some NFS mounts I don't
want):
/
/boot
/usr
/usr/local
/usr/local/apache
The problem comes when I run rsync with
2006 Aug 07
2
HTTP Pipelining
I am trying to understand why Mongrel so forcefully disables http
pipelining. The docs say because the spec is unclear, and it hurts
performance. These reasons smell... wrong. The HTTP spec is pretty
clear, and, er, I cannot find anywhere else that claims there is a
performance drawback, and lots of studies (and personal benchmarks
across years of writing webapps) showing how much it