search for: bremner

Olly Betts <olly at survex.com> writes: > On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 08:43:13AM -0400, David Bremner wrote: >> Olly Betts <olly at survex.com> writes: >> >> > To achieve this with synonyms in a configurable way you'd need to >> > rewrite the synonyms in the database to match the current configuration, >> > so it's not as dynamic as the above. &...

On 2018-03-29 04:17:21, Olly Betts wrote: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 05:03:21PM -0300, David Bremner wrote: >> I can confirm this reproduces both the xapian-check and the notmuch-show >> error. Olly agrees that whatever notmuch is doing wrong, it shouldn't >> lead to a corrupted database > > There was a Xapian bug here, which I fixed on master last week and will > be...

Antoine Beaupré <anarcat at orangeseeds.org> writes: > On 2018-03-19 13:36:49, David Bremner wrote: >> >> I can't duplicate that part. > > That's very strange. I can reproduce this on my workstation here, but > taking the tarball I sent in the original message, I can't reproduce > anymore. So something changed! I suspect it's the "flags"...

"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill at shutemov.name> writes: > Hello, > > I found that on particular queries notmuch return different results if run > the query few times. Re-initialing the query or db doesn't help. > > I've attached test case along with corpus of messages. > > Unpack the archive and run `make' there. It will initialize the notmuch

i like to know how do we use 'FLAG_FUZZY' if one need to use 'quest' to do the search query. -- Best regards, io On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 05:10:57PM -0400, David Bremner wrote: > Olly Betts <olly at survex.com> writes: > > > The development version of Xapian supports both `*` and `?` glob-style > > wildcards in any position. > > > > You can enable them for the QueryParser using FLAG_WILDCARD_MULTI, > > FLAG_WILDCARD_SINGLE...

...out a couple of things in debugger.cc, but they seem both innocuous and unrelated. > If that doesn't help, either we need to find a way to reproduce this > which isn't using sensitive data, or add more consistency checks to the > code to try to pin down what's going on. David Bremner had a dataset that produced this same failure, I believe. I don't know the origin or status of that dataset - David? Just for completeness, I forced notmuch to build a chert database and the initial scan ran through to completion without any problems. dme. -- I'm not the reason you'r...

On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 09:05:25AM -0300, David Bremner wrote: > if (str.find (' ') != std::string::npos) > query_str = '"' + str + '"'; > else > query_str = str; > > return parser.parse_query (query_str, NOTMUCH_QUERY_PARSER_FLAGS, term_prefix); I wouldn't recommend try...

...sages in INBOX folder are tagged as inbox [Filter.2] query = '(NOT folder:"//(INBOX|Inbox|inbox)$/") AND (tag:inbox)' tags = -inbox message = Messages not in INBOX folder cannot be inbox #~/.notmuch-config [database] path=/home-path/.mail [new] tags=new On 07/04/18 12:51, David Bremner wrote: > Javier Garcia <javiertury at gmail.com> writes: > >> I've applied the path to notmuch 0.26.1 without success. >> >> $ rm -rf ~/.mail/.notmuch >> $ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/hidden-path/notmuch-0.26.1/lib/:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH >> ./notmuch new >>    Fo...

On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 09:50:30AM +0100, James Aylett wrote: > Note that I'm using 1.4.7, and from your output I believe you're not > (the * in the query description I believe doesn't happen in those > situations any more). 1.4.4 and later eliminate redundant 0 scaling factors, but this one isn't actually redundant: > > Query(((Tmail AND 0 * XSUBJECTnot at 1)

David Bremner <david at tethera.net> writes: >> Here's why it would freeze: >> >> I have a post-new hook that runs a Python script. Depending on >> whether the new email it is processing matches a rule I have, >> it will fire off an email to the sender using the SMTP...

Matt <mattator at gmail.com> writes: > thanks didn't know about xapian-check ! > the output > === > docdata: > blocksize=8K items=70 firstunused=3 revision=421 levels=0 root=2 > B-tree checked okay > docdata table structure checked OK > > termlist: > blocksize=8K items=186136 firstunused=62058 revision=421 levels=2 root=12260 > B-tree checked okay >

Olly Betts <olly at survex.com> writes: > A better option for this is probably a FieldProcessor - you set one for > a prefix and the it gets passed the value and returns a Query object > for it. E.g. in lua (where you can just pass an anon function for the > FieldProcessor - we ought to support C++11 lambdas for such things): [snip] > To achieve this with synonyms in a

Franz Fellner <alpine.art.de at gmail.com> writes: > I also suffer from bad performance of notmuch new. I used notmuch > some years ago and notmuch new always felt instantanious. Had to stop > using it because internet was too slow to sync my mails :/ Now (with > better internet and a completely new setup using mbsync) indexing one > mail takes at least 10 seconds,

I am attempting to model data with the following variables: timepoint - n=48, monthly over 4 years hospital - n=3 opsn1 - no of outcomes total.patients skillmixpc - skill mix percentage nurse.hours.per.day Aims To determine if skillmix affects rate (i.e. no.of.outcomes/total.patients). To determine if nurse.hours.per.day affects rate. To determine if rates vary between

Mueen Nawaz <mueen at nawaz.org> writes: > After a lot of poking around, I figured out the problem, and this may be > of interest to the developers (although not sure if it is a xapian issue > or a notmuch issue). > > Here's why it would freeze: > > I have a post-new hook that runs a Python script. Depending on whether > the new email it is processing matches a

Javier Garcia <javiertury at gmail.com> writes: > I've applied the path to notmuch 0.26.1 without success. > > $ rm -rf ~/.mail/.notmuch > $ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/hidden-path/notmuch-0.26.1/lib/:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH > ./notmuch new >    Found 20065 total files (that's not much mail). >    Processed 20065 total files in 58s (341 files/sec.). >    Added 19605 new

io <io at ooeeeoo.com> writes: > what xapian 'indexing system' did was to index the entire sentence > 'xxx_yyy' and you will not be able to find any sentence which contain > the word 'yyy'? I'm curious that you refer to xxx_yyy as a sentence. In the contexts I am familiar with, the point of _ is to join things together into one word (or one

On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 06:39:43AM -0500, David Bremner wrote: > I guess the restriction is based on what is easy to do efficiently with > the Xapian database (find prefixes). If I remember correctly there was > some work in progress to support leading wildcards in Xapian. I can't > find relevant discussion now, but I CC'ed the Xapi...

Olly Betts <olly at survex.com> writes: > The development version of Xapian supports both `*` and `?` glob-style > wildcards in any position. > > You can enable them for the QueryParser using FLAG_WILDCARD_MULTI, > FLAG_WILDCARD_SINGLE or FLAG_WILDCARD_GLOB (the last one is just the > first two combined). I see FLAG_FUZZY as well, supporting edit distance. Sounds like

On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 11:24:36PM -0400, David Bremner wrote: > I have an application for synonyms for tags in in notmuch, which means > synonym expansion for a particular boolean prefix. I have a vague memory > of Olly telling me this doesn't work, but I'm not sure about the > details. Yes, synonym expansion isn't done for boo...