search for: bracketed

Hello list, Using a terminal with bracketed paste mode (see [0], [1]), I am not able to paste text while being in the "~C" command line mode. The reason for that is, that while being in that special mode, openssh-client attempts to interpret the special bracketed paste start escape sequence, which does not work: root at localhost...

Does anyone know about this device? SESX3Y11Z 32 GB 2.5-Inch SATA Solid State Drive with Marlin Bracket for Sun SPARC Enterprise T5120, T5220, T5140 and T5240 Servers, RoHS-6 Compliant This is from Sun''s catalog for the T5120 server. Would this work well as a separate ZIL device for ZFS? Is there any way I could use this in a T2000 server? The brackets appear to be

Hi, I can't seem to get an answer for this by searching through the R-help archives: How does one remove leading brackets in print? For example, >print( 3 ) >[1] 3 Would it be possible to get rid of the "[1]"? Of course the effect is the same without "print", as in, >3 >[1] 3 but I would only be interested in omitting brackets in printing, if that's

Hello, Does anybody know of a place to get a half-height PCI slot bracket for the Digium T100P card? I have an application to fit them in 1U cases for small, deployable PBX's. The T100P itself is short enough to fit in a half-height slot but I need an appropriate mounting bracket to screw it into the case. Thanks, Mark Hagler

Colleagues ---------------------------------- System info: R version rw1022 on NT ESS v. 5.1.18 using emacs ver. 20.4 ---------------------------------- I have some rather unusual units for acoustic volume backscattering integrated over several metres depth and 10 transmits (which happens to = 160 m along transect). I need to express these units in a graph label. My problem

On 12/2/06, Jim Laskey <jlaskey at apple.com> wrote: > Rafael, > > Please bracket portions of your changes that involve modification of > C/C++ source code. For cases of modifying configuration scripts and > make files, use your best judgement. Obviously having the brackets > emitted in generated code is problematic (line numbers et cetera), so > don't bother in

Hello, I'd like to remove the individual pairs of square brackets along with their content - plus the space directly behind it - from address strings such as this: [Swidsinski, Alexander; Loening-Baucke, Vera; Lochs, Herbert] Charite Humboldt Univ, Innere Klin, D-10098 Berlin, Germany; [Hale, Laura P.] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, Durham, NC 27710 USA I'd like get the

Dear list, I am importing data consisting of numbers into dataframes. Some of the numbers are flanked by parentheses or square brackets. Thus, they are not recognized as numeric and the corresponding column is of class "factor" which makes it hard/impossible use in plotting functions. Is there a way to remove brackets from numbers in a column/row/dataframe? Kind regards, Stefan --

I have a text string that contains text within two brackets. e.g. "testdata[3]" "testdata[-4]", "testdata[-4g]", I wish to "extract" the string enclosed in brackets? What is a good way to do this? e.g. fun(testdata[3]) = '3' fun(testdata[-4g]) = '-4g' --------------------------------- Moody friends. Drama queens. Your life?

Dear Users, I have the following text plotted inside a graphic: text(16200, 2.8*0.97, expression(NH[3]==0.33-1.1 %*% 10^-5 %*% day), adj=c(1,1)) I need to include square brackets in the expression around the ammonia to have it plotted like that: [NO3-]. I tried instinctively to use %[% to plot the brackets, but it did not work. Does anybody of you know what is the correct syntax to plot

Le mardi 31 mars 2020 ? 15:07 +1300, Paul Murrell a ?crit : > > Thanks, that's useful. For my own memory, this is the parenthesis > block > that might be useful ... > > U+239b Sm LEFT PARENTHESIS UPPER HOOK ? > U+239c Sm LEFT PARENTHESIS EXTENSION ? > U+239d Sm LEFT PARENTHESIS LOWER HOOK ? > U+239e Sm RIGHT PARENTHESIS UPPER HOOK ? > U+239f Sm RIGHT

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1734 Summary: IPv6 address in port forward options (-L) requires square brackets Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.4p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo:

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1602 Summary: ssh: doesn't handle IPv6 addresses with brackets Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.2p1 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: low-hanging-fruit Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo:

dear R wizards: `optimize()` requires the user to provide the brackets. I can write a bracketing routine, given a function and a starting point, but I was wondering whether there was already a "standard" user-exposed implementation. (Presumably, this is used in nlm, too; alas, nlm is in C, not native R.) regards, /iaw

Hi, this should be an easy one, but I can't figure it out. I have a vector of tests, with their units between brackets (if they have units). eg tests <- c("pH", "Assay (%)", "Impurity A(%)", "content (mg/ml)") Now I would like to hava a function where I use a test as input, and which returns the units like: f <- function (x) sub("\\)",

...>> and an EndLabel between the "may throwing" instruction. This is what the >> codegen of an InvokeInst does. >> > > the rule is that all instructions between eh begin labelN and eh end labelN > must unwind to the same landing pad. This is why invokes are bracketed by > such labels. There are also two other cases to consider: (1) potentially > throwing instructions which are not allowed to throw (nounwind), What do you mean "not allowed"? Is this decided by the front-end? Or by an optimization pass (div may throw, but if we have a = b / 5 w...

Attached is the current ARM patch. It allows the LLVM branch to compile on linux/arm and the resulting libgcc is compatible with a glibc compiled a vanilla gcc,i.e, a statically compiled hello world works :-) The patch was constructed by merging patches from gcc 4.1 with minimal editing for making merging easier. It was requested that I bracket the changes, I will try to remove all unnecessary

Hi, Would anyone have any idea as to why I would obtain completely different results when subsetting using the subset function vs bracket notation? I have a data frame with 65 variables and 4382 rows. When I use execute the following subset command I get the correct results (125 rows) > subset(df, Renewal==TRUE, 1:2)   However, I tried to obtain the same results with bracket notation as

Hi all, I have written code to send mails through action_mailer, where in I called MassNotifier.deliver_forward_review_link(current_user.profile.display_name,email,params[:notification][:message],params[:title],params[:designation],params[:company],params[:id],@invitation.invitation_code) this method , and in mass_notifier.rb I fave written def

...en so that it generates a BeginLabel > and an EndLabel between the "may throwing" instruction. This is what the > codegen of an InvokeInst does. the rule is that all instructions between eh begin labelN and eh end labelN must unwind to the same landing pad. This is why invokes are bracketed by such labels. There are also two other cases to consider: (1) potentially throwing instructions which are not allowed to throw (nounwind), (2) throwing instructions for which any thrown exception will not be processed in this function. In case (1) the instruction should have no entry in the fin...