search for: br_nf_forward_finish

...atic unsigned int br_nf_local_in(unsig { struct sk_buff *skb = *pskb; - if (skb->protocol != __constant_htons(ETH_P_IP)) - return NF_ACCEPT; - if (skb->dst == (struct dst_entry *)&__fake_rtable) { dst_release(skb->dst); skb->dst = NULL; @@ -310,12 +342,13 @@ static int br_nf_forward_finish(struct s { struct nf_bridge_info *nf_bridge = skb->nf_bridge; struct net_device *in; + struct vlan_ethhdr *hdr = (struct vlan_ethhdr *)(skb->mac.ethernet); #ifdef CONFIG_NETFILTER_DEBUG skb->nf_debug ^= (1 << NF_BR_FORWARD); #endif - if (skb->protocol == __constant_ht...

...128kB 0*256kB 1*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 548kB Normal: empty HighMem: empty Swap cache: add 120470, delete 120465, find 45260/94674, race 0+2 printk: 51 messages suppressed. init: page allocation failure. order:0, mode:0x20 [<c01417a3>] __alloc_pages+0x2b3/0x430 [<c916d528>] br_nf_forward_finish+0xb8/0x140 [bridge] [<c0144611>] kmem_getpages+0x31/0xa0 [<c9167d70>] br_forward_finish+0x0/0x70 [bridge] [<c014537e>] cache_grow+0x9e/0x190 [<c01455bd>] cache_alloc_refill+0x14d/0x220 [<c9167d70>] br_forward_finish+0x0/0x70 [bridge] [<c9168a30>] br_handle_...

...ev_queue_push_xmit+0x0/0x140 [<c05bbda0>] br_dev_queue_push_xmit+0x0/0x140 [<c04f0f4e>] nf_hook_slow+0x6e/0x120 [<c05bbda0>] br_dev_queue_push_xmit+0x0/0x140 [<c05bbf40>] br_forward_finish+0x60/0x70 [<c05bbda0>] br_dev_queue_push_xmit+0x0/0x140 [<c05c1b71>] br_nf_forward_finish+0x71/0x130 [<c05bbee0>] br_forward_finish+0x0/0x70 [<c05c1d20>] br_nf_forward_ip+0xf0/0x1a0 [<c05c1b00>] br_nf_forward_finish+0x0/0x130 [<c05bbee0>] br_forward_finish+0x0/0x70 [<c04f0eab>] nf_iterate+0x6b/0xa0 [<c05bbee0>] br_forward_finish+0x0/0x70 [<c...

br_nf_forward_ip() { parent = bridge_parent(out); NF_HOOK(pf, NF_INET_FORWARD, skb, brnf_get_logical_dev(skb, in), parent, br_nf_forward_finish); } here, let us suppose pf = NFPROTO_IPV4, i think the return value of brnf_get_logical_dev(skb, in) equals parent ? its comment 'This is the 'purely bridged' case. For IP, we pass the packet to * netfilter with indev and outdev set to the bridge device' so when calls hooks at ip...

br_nf_forward_ip() { parent = bridge_parent(out); NF_HOOK(pf, NF_INET_FORWARD, skb, brnf_get_logical_dev(skb, in), parent, br_nf_forward_finish); } here, let us suppose pf = NFPROTO_IPV4, i think the return value of brnf_get_logical_dev(skb, in) equals parent ? its comment 'This is the 'purely bridged' case. For IP, we pass the packet to * netfilter with indev and outdev set to the bridge device' so when calls hooks at ip...

br_nf_forward_ip() { parent = bridge_parent(out); NF_HOOK(pf, NF_INET_FORWARD, skb, brnf_get_logical_dev(skb, in), parent, br_nf_forward_finish); } here, let us suppose pf = NFPROTO_IPV4, i think the return value of brnf_get_logical_dev(skb, in) equals parent ? its comment 'This is the 'purely bridged' case. For IP, we pass the packet to * netfilter with indev and outdev set to the bridge device' so when calls hooks at ip...

Hi, after I saw that my machine was having problems to forward more than 200 Mbit/s, I decided to profile the kernel and find out the hotspots. This is what I found: [...] 1028 bridge.ko __br_forward 1033 bridge.ko br_nf_forward_finish 1074 bridge.ko ip_sabotage_in 1119 ebtable_filter.ko ebt_hook 1177 sky2.ko sky2_phy_stats 1304 bridge.ko setup_pre_routing 1417 bridge.ko br_fdb_cleanup 1425 sky2.ko sky2_put_idx 1766 i...

Just gave 3.0 a spin. Had been running 2.0.7 for the past 3 months or so without problems (aside from intermittent failure during live migration). Anyway, 3.0 seems to have an issue with my machine. It starts up the 4 domains that I''ve got defined (was running 6 user domains with 2.0.7, but two of those were running 2.4 kernels which I can''t seem to build with Xen 3.0 yet, and

...ec 8 12:19:26 server kernel: [br_forward_finish+0/65] br_forward_finish+0x0/0x41 Dec 8 12:19:26 server kernel: [br_dev_queue_push_xmit+216/223] br_dev_queue_push_xmit+0xd8/0xdf Dec 8 12:19:26 server kernel: [br_forward_finish+61/65] br_forward_finish+0x3d/0x41 Dec 8 12:19:26 server kernel: [br_nf_forward_finish+199/204] br_nf_forward_finish+0xc7/0xcc Dec 8 12:19:26 server kernel: [br_nf_forward_arp+274/285] br_nf_forward_arp+0x112/0x11d Dec 8 12:19:26 server kernel: [nf_iterate+63/109] nf_iterate+0x3f/0x6d Dec 8 12:19:26 server kernel: [br_forward_finish+0/65] br_forward_finish+0x0/0x41 Dec 8 12:19...

Hi, I have 2 servers which are connected to a gateway machine. The gateway and one server are running Linux 2.6.16.2, while the third machine is running 2.6.16.5. The two ethernet ports on the gateway which are connected to the servers are combined into a single ethernet bridge device. Ever since 2.6.16, I have noticed that I can no longer cross-mount the two servers' /home directories via