search for: br_get_port_ifindices

...num) -{ - struct net_device *dev; - int i = 0; - - read_lock(&dev_base_lock); - for (dev = dev_base; dev && i < num; dev = dev->next) { - if (dev->priv_flags & IFF_EBRIDGE) - indices[i++] = dev->ifindex; - } - read_unlock(&dev_base_lock); - - return i; -} - -void br_get_port_ifindices(struct net_bridge *br, int *ifindices, int num) -{ - struct net_bridge_port *p; - - rcu_read_lock(); - list_for_each_entry_rcu(p, &br->port_list, list) { - if (p->port_no < num) - ifindices[p->port_no] = p->dev->ifindex; - } - rcu_read_unlock(); -} - - void __exit br_clean...

I have a bridge that has gigabit interfaces. The machine in question has the fun job of being a Bridge, Firewall and SMB server. Both of the Gigabit interfaces are connected to workstations directly via Xover cable (well MDI-X to be exact). My question is, if I enable jumbo frames on the gigabit interfaces will that make any difference in overall transfer rate of the bridge? I was thinking it