Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "br_fdb_sticki".
Did you mean:
br_fdb_sticky
2023 Apr 12
1
[Bridge] [PATCH net] net: bridge: switchdev: don't notify FDB entries with "master dynamic"
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 05:27:33PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> How are extern_learn FDB entries processed by spectrum's
> SWITCHDEV_FDB_ADD_TO_DEVICE handler?
No different than "BR_FDB_STATIC", which is a bug I'm aware of and
intend to fix in net-next when I get the time (together with all the
other combinations enabled by the bridge). Entry has ageing disabled,
but
2023 Apr 12
1
[Bridge] [PATCH net] net: bridge: switchdev: don't notify FDB entries with "master dynamic"
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 07:00:02PM +0300, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 05:27:33PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > How are extern_learn FDB entries processed by spectrum's
> > SWITCHDEV_FDB_ADD_TO_DEVICE handler?
>
> No different than "BR_FDB_STATIC", which is a bug I'm aware of and
> intend to fix in net-next when I get the time
2023 Apr 12
1
[Bridge] [PATCH net] net: bridge: switchdev: don't notify FDB entries with "master dynamic"
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 05:15:03PM +0300, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> > Looking at tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/, there is no valid
> > use of the "bridge fdb add ... master dynamic" command there, so I am
> > fairly confident that no one used to rely on this behavior.
>
> Yes, but there are tests that use "extern_learn". If you post a v2 that
>