Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "br_fdb_put_hook".
Did you mean:
br_fdb_get_hook
2007 Apr 18
3
[Bridge] [2.6 patch] fix bridge <-> ATM compile error
...error with CONFIG_BRIDGE=y and
CONFIG_ATM_LANE=m:
<-- snip -->
...
LD .tmp_vmlinux1
net/built-in.o(.init.text+0x3ad1): In function `br_init':
: undefined reference to `br_fdb_get_hook'
net/built-in.o(.init.text+0x3adb): In function `br_init':
: undefined reference to `br_fdb_put_hook'
net/built-in.o(.exit.text+0xa2): In function `br_deinit':
: undefined reference to `br_fdb_get_hook'
net/built-in.o(.exit.text+0xac): In function `br_deinit':
: undefined reference to `br_fdb_put_hook'
make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1
<-- snip -->
Signed-off-by: Adri...
2008 Jul 07
3
[Bridge] [RFC PATCH 0/2] Allow full bridge configuration via sysfs
Right now, you can configure most bridge device parameters via sysfs.
However, you cannot either:
- add or remove bridge interfaces
- add or remove physical interfaces from a bridge
The attached patch set rectifies this. With this patch set, brctl
(theoretically) becomes completely optional, much like ifenslave is
now for bonding. (In fact, the idea for this patch, and the syntax
used herein, is