Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "br332".
2015 Apr 14
2
Re: VM Performance using KVM Vs. VMware ESXi
...k is configured to use IDE, so performance of anything that does
> disk I/O is going to be terrible. You really want to be using virtio.
>
>> <interface type='bridge'>
>> <mac address='52:54:00:c9:58:c9'/>
>> <source bridge='br332'/>
>> <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x03' function='0x0'/>
>> </interface>
> This doesn't have any model listed at all, so it will be falling back to
> a generic emulated NIC. Again pe...
2015 Apr 14
3
Re: VM Performance using KVM Vs. VMware ESXi
...39;0'>
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x01'
function='0x1'/>
</controller>
<interface type='bridge'>
<mac address='52:54:00:c9:58:c9'/>
<source bridge='br332'/>
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x03'
function='0x0'/>
</interface>
<serial type='pty'>
<target port='0'/>
</serial>
<console type='pty'...
2015 Apr 14
5
Re: VM Performance using KVM Vs. VMware ESXi
...IDE, so performance of anything that
>> does disk I/O is going to be terrible. You really want to be using virtio.
>>
>>> <interface type='bridge'>
>>> <mac address='52:54:00:c9:58:c9'/>
>>> <source bridge='br332'/>
>>> <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x03' function='0x0'/>
>>> </interface>
>> This doesn't have any model listed at all, so it will be falling back
>> to a generic emul...
2015 Apr 14
0
Re: VM Performance using KVM Vs. VMware ESXi
...</disk>
This disk is configured to use IDE, so performance of anything that does
disk I/O is going to be terrible. You really want to be using virtio.
> <interface type='bridge'>
> <mac address='52:54:00:c9:58:c9'/>
> <source bridge='br332'/>
> <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x03' function='0x0'/>
> </interface>
This doesn't have any model listed at all, so it will be falling back to
a generic emulated NIC. Again performance of this i...
2015 Apr 14
0
Re: VM Performance using KVM Vs. VMware ESXi
...is configured to use IDE, so performance of anything that
> does disk I/O is going to be terrible. You really want to be using virtio.
>
>> <interface type='bridge'>
>> <mac address='52:54:00:c9:58:c9'/>
>> <source bridge='br332'/>
>> <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x03' function='0x0'/>
>> </interface>
> This doesn't have any model listed at all, so it will be falling back
> to a generic emulated NIC. Again p...
2015 Apr 14
0
Re: VM Performance using KVM Vs. VMware ESXi
...of anything that
>>> does disk I/O is going to be terrible. You really want to be using virtio.
>>>
>>>> <interface type='bridge'>
>>>> <mac address='52:54:00:c9:58:c9'/>
>>>> <source bridge='br332'/>
>>>> <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x03' function='0x0'/>
>>>> </interface>
>>> This doesn't have any model listed at all, so it will be falling back
>>> t...
2015 Apr 14
2
Re: VM Performance using KVM Vs. VMware ESXi
On 4/14/2015 4:02 PM, Dominique Ramaekers wrote:
>
> Dear Jatin,
>
> Maybe it’s a good idea first to implement Spice:
>
> <video>
>
> <model type='qxl' ram='65536' vram='65536' heads='1'/>
>
> <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x02'
> function='0x0'/>
>
2015 Apr 14
1
Re: VM Performance using KVM Vs. VMware ESXi
...is disk is configured to use IDE, so performance of anything that
> does disk I/O is going to be terrible. You really want to be using virtio.
>
>
> <interface type='bridge'>
> <mac address='52:54:00:c9:58:c9'/>
> <source bridge='br332'/>
> <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x03' function='0x0'/>
> </interface>
>
> This doesn't have any model listed at all, so it will be falling back
> to a generic emulated NIC. Again perf...