search for: bpo11

18.03.2023 01:56, spindles seven wrote: > On 16 March 2023 20:22 Michael Tokarev wrote: .. >> Once you remove my 4.17 repo from your sources.list, apt wont be able to find the >> right version of samba for bullseye, even if "almost" the same version is available in >> bpo11. > > Thanks for this. However, I don't understand this last statement - once I removed your repo from the sources.list.d, the update went through no problem from the bullseye-backports repo. Can you clarify? I wasn't clear enough. If you installed some samba component from my rep...

...is not a good idea to have the same > version of samba packages for bullseye on my repository as on testing/unstable. > But people insisted :) > > The thing is: both my bullseye 4.17 repository and debian unstable now has version > 4.17.6+dfsg-1. bullseye-backports has 4.17.6+dfsg-1~bpo11-1, which is *less* than > 4.17.6+dfsg-1. > > Once you remove my 4.17 repo from your sources.list, apt wont be able to find the > right version of samba for bullseye, even if "almost" the same version is available in > bpo11. Thanks for this. However, I don't understa...

On 13 March 2023 15:19 Dr. Nicola Mingotti wrote: > Hi, > > Just an idea, > > i was moving samba in the last days, i put in my note that i did: > --- > $> sudo apt install -t bullseye-backports winbind > --- > > So maybe, if you installed the stable winbind and the backported samba there are issues. > > You might try to remove winbind and reinstall it from

...sts in the SYSVOL directory. An example of a policy I'd like to set in the GPO is *"Interactive logon: Message text for users attempting to log on"*. P.S.: A suggestion made elsewhere was to upgrade samba to the bullseye-backports version, so i did that. Upgrading to *2:4.17.5+dfsg-1~bpo11+1 *did not change anything for my issue.

...to set in the GPO is *"Interactive >>> logon: >>> Message text for users attempting to log on"*. >>> P.S.: A suggestion made elsewhere was to upgrade samba to the >>> bullseye-backports version, so i did that. >>> Upgrading to *2:4.17.5+dfsg-1~bpo11+1 *did not change anything for >>> my issue. >> Which RSAT are you referring to? There's the yast-based one I >> created, and there is one Alt Linux is working on, IIRC. >> > > There is the one that small company produces, what's its name, oh I > know...

...*"Interactive >>>> logon: >>>> Message text for users attempting to log on"*. >>>> P.S.: A suggestion made elsewhere was to upgrade samba to the >>>> bullseye-backports version, so i did that. >>>> Upgrading to *2:4.17.5+dfsg-1~bpo11+1 *did not change anything for >>>> my issue. >>> Which RSAT are you referring to? There's the yast-based one I >>> created, and there is one Alt Linux is working on, IIRC. >>> >> >> There is the one that small company produces, what's it...