Displaying 20 results from an estimated 44 matches for "boxem".
Did you mean:
boxes
2011 Jan 05
4
[LLVMdev] include/Config/config.h discrepancies between CMake and autofoo builds
2011/1/5 Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es>:
> Ruben Van Boxem <vanboxem.ruben at gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Yeah that's the two different ones I mean. Everything MS (intrinsics,
>> language features etc...) is purely version-bound, so I don't even get
>> why CMake insists on checking every known function prototype of for
>&g...
2010 Dec 31
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM on Windows MSVC 10
I first sent this to the Clang dev list, but they told me to come here:
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Ruben Van Boxem <vanboxem.ruben at gmail.com>
Date: 2010/12/31
Subject: LLVM on Windows MSVC 10
To: cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
Hi,
I'm trying to build svn LLVM with Visual Studio 2010:
cd build
cmake .. -G"NMake Makefiles"
nmake
and several link steps fail due to a missing symbol:
> LLVMX8...
2011 Jan 05
2
[LLVMdev] Fw: include/Config/config.h discrepancies between CMake and autofoo builds
Whoops, phone rang and I forgot to cc to the list before I typed the message.
----- Forwarded Message ----
> From: Samuel Crow <samuraileumas at yahoo.com>
> To: Ruben Van Boxem <vanboxem.ruben at gmail.com>
> Sent: Wed, January 5, 2011 3:38:21 PM
> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] include/Config/config.h discrepancies between CMake and
>autofoo builds
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> > From: Ruben Van Boxem <vanboxem.ruben at...
2010 Dec 31
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM on Windows MSVC 10
I don't normally build using nmake.. but I just tried and it worked 100%
here.
Are you sure you are using the trunk?
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 7:32 AM, Ruben Van Boxem
<vanboxem.ruben at gmail.com>wrote:
> I first sent this to the Clang dev list, but they told me to come here:
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Ruben Van Boxem <vanboxem.ruben at gmail.com>
> Date: 2010/12/31
> Subject: LLVM on Windows MSVC 10
&...
2010 Dec 31
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM on Windows MSVC 10
2010/12/31 Francois Pichet <pichet2000 at gmail.com>:
> I don't normally build using nmake.. but I just tried and it worked 100%
> here.
> Are you sure you are using the trunk?
>
> On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 7:32 AM, Ruben Van Boxem <vanboxem.ruben at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> I first sent this to the Clang dev list, but they told me to come here:
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Ruben Van Boxem <vanboxem.ruben at gmail.com>
>> Date: 2010/12/31
&...
2011 Oct 06
3
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] [Patch] Build failure on Windows+MinGW (GCC and Clang)
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Ruben Van Boxem
<vanboxem.ruben at gmail.com> wrote:
> You're welcome! Please remember that MinGW-w64 does not mean it is 64-bit.
> It provides both 32- and 64-bit headers/libs. The "w64" in the name was
> originally because that was the project's principal goal, among extending
&g...
2011 Oct 06
1
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] [Patch] Build failure on Windows+MinGW (GCC and Clang)
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Ruben Van Boxem
<vanboxem.ruben at gmail.com> wrote:
> When building LLVM/Clang, I get the following build failure:
>
> MinGW-w64 provides the necessary typedefs and declarations. I adjusted the
> ifdef's to include a check for a the MinGW-w64-specific symbol of choice to
> differentiate m...
2011 Oct 20
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] [Patch] Build failure on Windows+MinGW (GCC and Clang)
2011/10/6 Aaron Ballman <aaron at aaronballman.com>
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Ruben Van Boxem
> <vanboxem.ruben at gmail.com> wrote:
> > You're welcome! Please remember that MinGW-w64 does not mean it is
> 64-bit.
> > It provides both 32- and 64-bit headers/libs. The "w64" in the name was
> > originally because that was the project's principal...
2011 Jan 05
2
[LLVMdev] include/Config/config.h discrepancies between CMake and autofoo builds
2011/1/5 Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es>:
> Ruben Van Boxem <vanboxem.ruben at gmail.com> writes:
>
>> And this is why I don't understand configure checks for windows... There's
>> only one/two header/library sets... The Windows SDK and MinGW. This info
>> should be built in IMHO...
>
> Although the panorama is not s...
2010 Dec 31
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM on Windows MSVC 10
Ruben Van Boxem <vanboxem.ruben at gmail.com> writes:
>>> I'm trying to build svn LLVM with Visual Studio 2010:
>>>
>>> cd build
>>> cmake .. -G"NMake Makefiles"
>>> nmake
>>>
>>> and several link steps fail due to a missing symbol...
2011 Jan 29
3
[LLVMdev] Linking on Windows with LLVM tools
Hi,
Can the tools in LLVM create a Win32 exe or dll file? Or does LLVM
still rely on Binutils and GCC for that? Is it
possible/feasable/wanted that the LLVM toolchain could do this?
Thanks,
Ruben
2011 Feb 01
0
[LLVMdev] Linking on Windows with LLVM tools
Ruben,
2011/1/30 Ruben Van Boxem <vanboxem.ruben at gmail.com>:
> Can the tools in LLVM create a Win32 exe or dll file? Or does LLVM
> still rely on Binutils and GCC for that? Is it
> possible/feasable/wanted that the LLVM toolchain could do this?
As you know, we need our linker!
Please look into the slide in http...
2011 Oct 06
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] [Patch] Build failure on Windows+MinGW (GCC and Clang)
2011/10/6 Aaron Ballman <aaron at aaronballman.com>
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Ruben Van Boxem
> <vanboxem.ruben at gmail.com> wrote:
> > When building LLVM/Clang, I get the following build failure:
> >
> > MinGW-w64 provides the necessary typedefs and declarations. I adjusted
> the
> > ifdef's to include a check for a the MinGW-w64-specific symbol of...
2013 Jun 25
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Windows implementation of enable_execute_stack
2013/5/30 Ruben Van Boxem <vanboxem.ruben at gmail.com>
> 2013/5/25 Aaron Ballman <aaron at aaronballman.com>
>
>> On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Ruben Van Boxem
>> <vanboxem.ruben at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I submitted this patch a long while ag...
2011 Jan 05
0
[LLVMdev] include/Config/config.h discrepancies between CMake and autofoo builds
Ruben Van Boxem <vanboxem.ruben at gmail.com> writes:
> And this is why I don't understand configure checks for windows... There's
> only one/two header/library sets... The Windows SDK and MinGW. This info
> should be built in IMHO...
Although the panorama is not so diverse as the Unix wor...
2012 Jan 20
0
[LLVMdev] Implementation of builtins/intrinsics
Le 20 janv. 2012 à 14:38, Ruben Van Boxem a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Lately, I have been wondering how a compiler like GCC or Clang implements builtin functions like sqrt, sin, and also more bit-specific things like bcmp and ffs. Originially, these were all deferred to the C library where they might still have a "backup implementa...
2012 Aug 03
1
[LLVMdev] Unable to build compiler-rt (Windows)
2012/8/3 xunxun <xunxun1982 at gmail.com>
> 于 2012/8/3 17:44, Ruben Van Boxem 写道:
>
> Hi,
>>
>> As it stands, I cannot build nor test compiler-rt. I downloaded the
>> latest sources from svn (http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-**
>> project/compiler-rt/trunk<http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/compiler-rt/trunk>)
>> and ran
>> cmake ../../...
2011 Jan 05
2
[LLVMdev] include/Config/config.h discrepancies between CMake and autofoo builds
Op 5 jan. 2011 19:33 schreef "Anton Korobeynikov" <anton at korobeynikov.info>
het volgende:
>
> > contains most of them. If they're non-trivial (like the ones I needed to
> > add for OSX functionality) that's a different story.
> FWIW the difference is even more significant on, e.g. mingw32 because
> process spawning is pretty much expensive and
2012 Aug 03
0
[LLVMdev] Unable to build compiler-rt (Windows)
于 2012/8/3 17:44, Ruben Van Boxem 写道:
> Hi,
>
> As it stands, I cannot build nor test compiler-rt. I downloaded the
> latest sources from svn
> (http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/compiler-rt/trunk) and ran
> cmake ../../Source/compiler-rt -G"MinGW Makefiles"
>
> and got the following error:
> ....
2011 Jan 05
0
[LLVMdev] include/Config/config.h discrepancies between CMake and autofoo builds
Ruben Van Boxem <vanboxem.ruben at gmail.com> writes:
> Yeah that's the two different ones I mean. Everything MS (intrinsics,
> language features etc...) is purely version-bound, so I don't even get
> why CMake insists on checking every known function prototype of for
> example "rec...