search for: bourne_shel

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "bourne_shel".

Did you mean: bourne_shell
2016 Apr 27
0
Bourne shell deprecated?
...gimer# ls -lah /bin/sh > lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 4 Jan 11 06:02 /bin/sh -> bash There seems to be a big confusion in this thread. The Bourne shell has gone long time ago. The Bourne-Again shell is bash (which is GNU software). Bash is not the Bourne shell. FYI: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bourne_shell Regards, -- wwp -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20160427/dded7cb5/attachment-0001.sig&...
2015 Feb 14
3
C5 BASH IF
On 02/14/2015 12:03 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 11:36 AM, J Martin Rushton > <martinrushton56 at btinternet.com> wrote: >> <snip> >>> To understand it completely you need to know the order of >>> operations as the shell makes multiple passes over the line, >>> parsing, processing metacharacters, and expanding variables. And
2016 Apr 27
6
Bourne shell deprecated?
On 26/04/16 10:07 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 4/26/2016 6:45 PM, Jack Bailey wrote: >> >> Today someone in a meeting claimed the Bourne shell is deprecated, one >> of the reasons being it supposedly has security issues. Well that's >> all news to me, and I cannot find anything online to corroborate the >> claim. Is this true, is it a bash vs. Bourne FUD, or