search for: bottompass

...> > Does anyone see anything wrong with my use of the pass manager > interface? As far as I can tell, the code looks correct. Your pass manager interface is OK. You are requesting PassManager to make a Function level analysis pass (Pass1) available to Module level transformation pass (BottomPass). In real life you could use it to request Dominator information for a module level pass. This is supported and it works. The reason it fails for your test case is that the function "main" is just a declaration. There is no analysis info to generate. If you add a "main&quot...

Dear All, The attached code (which is a contrived test case) hits the following assertion: test: /home/vadve/criswell/src/llvm22/include/llvm/PassAnalysisSupport.h:226: AnalysisType& llvm::Pass::getAnalysisID(const llvm::PassInfo*, llvm::Function&) [with AnalysisType = Pass1]: Assertion `ResultPass && "getAnalysis*() called on an analysis that was not "

Dear Devang Patel, In response to your comment on bug 1868, how do I get BottomPass to requires Pass2 before Pass1? Is it by reversing the order of the calls to AU.addRequired()? -- John T. -- John T. Criswell jcriswel at bigw.org "It's today!" said Piglet. "My favorite day," said Pooh.

...t; On Dec 17, 2007, at 2:01 PM, John Criswell wrote: > >> Devang Patel wrote: >>> >>> On Dec 17, 2007, at 1:47 PM, John Criswell wrote: >>> >>>> Dear Devang Patel, >>>> >>>> In response to your comment on bug 1868, how do I get BottomPass to >>>> requires Pass2 before Pass1? Is it by reversing the order of the >>>> calls >>>> to AU.addRequired()? >>> >>> yup :) >> So what do I do if both Pass1 and Pass2 preserve nothing? Is that just >> unschedule'able with the...