search for: bottlenecked

Hi I must to estimate the* performance. I am try to understand which can be the eventual bottlenecks. Have you some suggestion? Can you to signal to me some problems? Thanks Alessandra

Samba bottlenecks? As my network grows I'll probably find Samba bottlenecks sooner or later - such as saturated bandwidth, internal I/O, bloated user database. Are there any signs to read foretelling the apocalypse? Are the any viable solutions? -- J?rgen Persson

Hello, I'm planning to use rsync for backup a lot of nodes to one rsync server over wan. I'm aware of the fact that on big directory tree rsync will consume a lot of memory and some time even hang. Do you have any estimation on how many rsync client can work with one server at the same time ? I can control each client bandwidth. What will be the bottleneck on the server resource ? Is

Hi David, > You're still using direct I/O with fio, which will likely disallow > client side caching with oplocks/leases. Is there a way to bypass this with settings in smb.conf at all and transform all writes to async? > I'd recommend checking that your (cifs.ko?) client is using a relatively > modern SMB2+ dialect and that leases are enabled on both sides. Yes, I

hello *, im running into two major bottlenecks an R script. 1. going through a 40mb file and reading in via readLines() 1 line at a time is almost an order of magnitude slow than the equivalent in python, im wondering if there are alternatives to readLines(), doing more lines at a time helps a bit 2. generating date sequences takes a long time, im basically doing something like

hi guys/gals I realize that this question must have been asked before, I sroogled and found some posts on the web on how to tweak/tune gluster, however.. What I hope is that some experts and/or devel could write a bit more, maybe compose a doc on - How to investigate and trouble gluster's speed-performance bottleneck. Why I think such a thorough guide would be important? Well.. I guess

Hi all. Since I installed SC2 on my Ubuntu 10.04 x86-64 (Phenom II X4 965 BE, 8 GB Ram, nVidia 470 GTX - Driver 260.19.06, USB mic+headphones), I never managed to play at it with Ultra details with more than 12~15 FPS. You could say that the fault is in a slow CPU, bad videocard or lousy sound card (the above USB stuff). But the CPU isn't that bad, the ram quantity is more than enough and

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Greetings! I run samba 3 since several years in a domain with more than 10000 users and multiple departments. We have a central Domain running a PDC and some domains in the departments. The domains in the departments are connected to the central domain via interdomain trusts. All PDCs are samba 3 using the same LDAP backends (very fast SunONE LDAP

Hi, On Fri, 19 Jul 2019 23:26:55 +0000, douxevip wrote: > So to summarize, this is the situation: > > 1) I run a fio benchmark requesting, small, random, async writes. Command is "fio --direct=1 --sync=0 --rw=randwrite --bs=4K --numjobs=1 --iodepth=1 --runtime=60 --group_reporting --name=sambatest --size=32k --time_based". I run this command on both the host, as on the Samba

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3505 Bug ID: 3505 Summary: SSH_MSG_CHANNEL_WINDOW_ADJUST bottleneck Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Hardware: Other OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Miscellaneous Assignee: unassigned-bugs at

We have a few dovecot servers all pointing to the same mail location (an NFS mount on a NAS drive). This could lead to a possible bottleneck eventually and we were wondering if it's possible to have dovecot direct x number of users to one message store location while others get their mail on a different mount?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BcwieeBEySc My performance doesn't even come close to this even at low resolution and overclocked, and I have the 512Mb version of this card, this guy has the 256mb version and I have the same settings, i've seen people run some really high-end games on this like crysis at decent settings, (not high just decent). Does wine actually bottleneck performance on

Dtrace and Performance Teams, I have the following IO Performance Specific Questions (and I''m already savy with the lockstat and pre-dtrace utilities for performance analysis.. but in need of details regarding specifying IO bottlenecks @ the controller or IO bus..) : **Q.A*> Determining IO Saturation bottlenecks ( */.. beyond service times and kernel contention.. )/ I''m

Hi Everyone, I have a Dell R210 server which has a Xeon X3430 Quad Core CPU (2.4Ghz x 4) with 8GB of RAM. I intend to use the H200 controller in a RAID1 setup How many VMs do you think I''d be able to run on this machine? Is 20 pushing it? I''d say most (if not all) guests would be in PV mode. Thanks _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list

Hi, On Thu, 18 Jul 2019 19:04:47 +0000, douxevip via samba wrote: > Hi, > > I have a ZFS dataset that has sync writes disabled (setting sync=disabled) which means that it will only do async writes, and sync requests get converted to async writes. The ZFS dataset is hosted on a single Samsung 840 Pro 512GB SATA SSD. > I have this same dataset served as a Samba share, using Proxmox VE

Good Day Everybody, I am in the process of planning a phone system for a small business (15 extensions - 4 PSTN lines [to be connected by ATAs]). The plan is to install an IP Phone everywhere there is an existing computer workstation - using the same LAN for phones and computers. The layout involves workstations connected to two switches (the unmanaged 'dumb' type) and the switches

Hi everyone, I''m doing some networking experiments over high BDP topologies. Right now the configuration is quite simple -- two Xen boxes connected via a dummynet router. The dummynet router is set to limit bandwidth to 500Mbps and simulate an RTT of 80ms. I''m using the following sysctl values: net.ipv4.tcp_rmem = 4096 87380 4194304 net.ipv4.tcp_wmem = 4096

I'm trying to get my network setup as streamlined as possible. I ran a brain-dead-simple speed test of Samba and I'm very confused by the results. Here's my setup: Fast new WinXP Pro machine NetGear GA311 gigabit ethernet ^ | dedicated gigabit ethernet line (no switch) v RTL8169 gigabit ethernet Relatively fast new Debian Linux machine I set up ramdisks on both

> On Mar 22, 2016, at 8:04 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > +pcc, who had some other ideas/patch out for improving memory usage of debug info > +Reid, who's responsible for the windows/CodeView/PDB debug info which is motivating some of the ideas about changes to type emission > > So how does this relate, or not, to Peter's (pcc) work trying to

Hello. I've been seting up a small VoIP setup, with roughly 5 persons, doing essentially some Meetme conferences. People have been experiencing some quality problems with the sound. Essentially delay, and some tolerable echo. I'd appreciate advice on how to troubleshoot this issue. What could be the most common reasons behind this? Please feel free to ask for more relevant details.