search for: bottiger1

Is there anything else besides GNU or any other targets in the future? My goal is to be able to not have all the binaries coming out to be GPL.. If not, I will have to go back to using C as an intermediate language. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090408/5216ab28/attachment.html>

On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Bot Tiger <bottiger1 at gmail.com> wrote: > Is there anything else besides GNU or any other targets in the future? > > My goal is to be able to not have all the binaries coming out to be GPL.. You do know that the GNU tools don't cause their output to be GPL'ed, right? http://www.gnu.org/licenses/g...

Hello. Is there a way to output native assembly from llvm-ld to FASM? Also when I tried to compile C code generated by llc with TCC, it complained about not having the alloca.h header. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090406/c3243719/attachment.html>

Hello, I have looked around the LLVM documentation, and tried to experiment with static compilation. So far It appears as though the assembly file is only compatible with GCC. When I use llvm-ld it also appears to use GCC. Is there any other assembler or compiler that can statically compile LLVM output? Thank you. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

...Emit AT&T-style assembly =intel - Emit Intel-style assembly Other than that, the assembly isn't really GCC-specific. Any assembler that can understand the different assembly language syntaxes should work. -bw On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Bot Tiger <bottiger1 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I have looked around the LLVM documentation, and tried to experiment with > static compilation. > > So far It appears as though the assembly file is only compatible with GCC. > > When I use llvm-ld it also appears to use GCC. > > Is...

> o.O How is that going to help your problem? (Note: LLVM can generate C code.) > -bw It will help because I can generate C code that isn't tied to GCC (which LLVM does not do from my tests so far).

...trap a compiler in my own language, it would not be "Eligible" anymore because it would be linking the GCC libraries but would not be done with GCC. On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Jeffrey Yasskin <jyasskin at google.com> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Bot Tiger <bottiger1 at gmail.com> wrote: >> Is there anything else besides GNU or any other targets in the future? >> >> My goal is to be able to not have all the binaries coming out to be GPL.. > > You do know that the GNU tools don't cause their output to be GPL'ed, > right? htt...

I've tried compiling with tinycc, and assembling with yasm, and fasm even with intel syntax. I'm just wondering what available compilers and assemblers there are without trying every one of them. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090408/b779a781/attachment.html>

> Visual Studio should be fine as long as you do not wish to use llvm-gcc. Is it recommended that I use Visual Studio if I am only interested in using the C++ bindings for creating my own multi-platform frontend? I don't think I will need to use the C frontend that Clang offers.

What is the recommended way to get a front-end to run on Windows? I have been able to successfully compile on Linux. I'm worried about documents stating all the shortcomings of the Visual Studio compiled version, but I do have mingw. Is there a guide for using mingw to compile? I thought about compiling to IR, but the documentation said the language is not stable.