search for: bothersome

...When the argument is small, I get the warning message: full precision was not achieved in 'pnt' which is nothing unexpected. (The density calls pnt, if you look at the function dnt.) However, to have this happen a huge number of times, when the optimizer is churning through the dataset is bothersome, but more importantly, a bottleneck in terms of speed. Is it possible to switch this off? Is there an setting somewhere that I am missing? Many thanks and best wishes, Ranjan

...changes its shell to bash. As a result, not only > is there an alternate root account (good in case 'root' trampled on by > accident or purpose), but you can get root bash as a login shell while > leaving the real root to its normal shell. This make it sound like you find it very bothersome to login and type 'bash' (or whatever), to give yourself the shell you want. Is that so? -- Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/

.... I read all the online help and still could not figure out the way to solve the problem. Also I do not understand why the data could be easily handled within R but could not write out due to the insufficient memory. I am not good at both R and computers. Sorry for my naive questions if it sounds bothersome. -- Xiaojing WANG Dept. of Human Genetics Univ. of Pittsburgh, PA 15261 Tel: 412-624-8157 [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...ction, GCC does the right thing. Is there some optimizer knob I'm not turning properly? In more complex cases, GCC does poorly with two-address operand choices and so bloats the code with unnecessary register moves. I have high hopes LLVM can do better, so this result for a simple case is bothersome. G

...and password schemes > The above not suggests I can't use DIGEST-MD5 with master password configuration, if using more than one passdb setup. I don't understand why there would be a restriction as the password validation should just fall through irrespective. > Because CRAM-MD5 is bothersome. Do you really need it? It's not really necessary with SSL. [Raymond] Unfortunately yes, part of the ONC 2015 Edition requirements. As you say its not really needed but more one of those tick the compliance boxes. > Problem #2 How do I enforce some kind of account access policy > >...

Makes sense. Can I use Ubuntu 22.04 as an alternative to Debian ? Does Ubuntu have a DEB package in the official repository? It's pretty bothersome if I build packages from source codes on Ubuntu, because they're so many packages and dependencies that need to be resolved. On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 5:07?PM Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On 06/06/2023 10:02, luckydog xf via samba wrote: > &g...

...t; > Is there some optimizer knob I'm not turning properly? In more > complex > cases, GCC does poorly with two-address operand choices and so bloats > the code with unnecessary register moves. I have high hopes LLVM > can do > better, so this result for a simple case is bothersome. Are you marking add as commutable? Are you making mov as a copy instruction? Evan > > G > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/...

Hi, Is there a way to stop Shorewall from sending its logging messages to the TTY''s? I''m using Debian Sarge in text mode, and it''s kind of bothersome sometimes. It also seems to follow me to any TTY. Thanks, -MikeD

...very weird problem on a CentOS 5.2 system. A few months ago, encrypted passwords in the shadow file were MD5'ed - allowing for long passwords, rather than only 8 characters max. Today, passwords are 3DES'ed only. No way to find how the system reverted to DES-encrypting. But what's more bothersome is we cannot get the system to go the MD5 way again, despite all our best efforts. Authconfig says this : pam_unix is always enabled shadow passwords are enabled password hashing algorithm is md5 So... where to look ? Tia, -- FdL

Hello. Whenever I attach a 2000 Pro workstation to a Samba server, a directory is created under the user's home directory called "profile", and the local profile syncs with this directory. Its not usually bothersome until someone leaves 2 GIG of data on their desktop and when they logoff, Windows syncs the entire 2 GIG of data to the server. How do I disable this? Attaching a 2000 Pro machine to a 2000 server doesn't yeild the same results, you have to explicitly turn on remote profiles. Thanks alot!

I hate to be bothersome, but can someone please comment on this? Thanks again, Hal On Thu, 3 May 2012 14:49:04 -0500 Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > Hello, > > The current code in PPCTargetLowering::LowerFormalArguments_SVR4 > contains a FIXME over the code which saves the live floating-poin...

...this sort of thing. On the plus side, there are copious assert() bits in there to catch it if the compiler gets itself confused, so you should know sooner rather than later if something goes wonky. -Jim On May 10, 2012, at 11:25 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > I hate to be bothersome, but can someone please comment on this? > > Thanks again, > Hal > > On Thu, 3 May 2012 14:49:04 -0500 > Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> The current code in PPCTargetLowering::LowerFormalArguments_SVR4 >> contains a FIX...

...;grey") abline(v=seq(0,14,by=0.2),lty=3,col="grey") abline(v=seq(0,14,by=1),lty=1,col="grey") par(new=TRUE) only yaxs="i" is taken into account while xaxs="i" is ignored. When I remove asp=1, xaxs="i" is activated again. Small bug but kind of bothersome...!! Congratulations for the great work you guys are doing! Fran?ois

...back what I said entirely. IIRC, NaNs are explicitly not supported in that mode, so all bets are off. Zero is a perfectly reasonable result. The result of this is that we return 0 only under -ffast-math. In all other cases, the sqrt call will remain and we will return NaN. So that seems like a bothersome discrepancy given that the Posix standard wording tends to favor NaN (though an implementation-defined value is allowable, regardless of -ffast-math). As mentioned earlier, a number of other compilers also generate NaN with -ffast-math or its equivalent. I believe this is done to comply with the...

...gt;> Is there some optimizer knob I'm not turning properly? In more complex >> cases, GCC does poorly with two-address operand choices and so bloats >> the code with unnecessary register moves. I have high hopes LLVM >> can do better, so this result for a simple case is bothersome. >> > > Are you marking add as commutable? Are you making mov as a copy > instruction? > How do I mark them? For the commutative property, I observed this definition: def add : SDNode<"ISD::ADD" , SDTIntBinOp , [SDN...

...arnings for 64-bit processors. most of these are generated by the PUSH/ALIGN macros. 2. float/double loss of precision warnings. most can be removed with explicit casts or appending the 'f' specifier to constants. i am willing to fix all these warnings, but don't want to make the merge bothersome. i can probably turn this around in a day, but i want to know how to submit the fixes to ensure that they are backwards compatible with other peoples compilers, etc. since new point release just came out, i figured now would be the right time. let me know the right process for this. regards, jon...

Hello, The current code in PPCTargetLowering::LowerFormalArguments_SVR4 contains a FIXME over the code which saves the live floating-point registers to the stack. The FIXME states that this should only be done if CR bit 6 is set. I've been told that the lack of this check is preventing clang/LLVM from compiling a functional FreeBSD kernel on PPC. Is is possible to insert another branch in

Hi Looking for some confirmation/direction on how to achieve the following. We have a requirement to support both SASL PLAIN and DIGEST-MD5 authentication (certification reasons). In addition to this we have an application (webmail) that utilises a master password pattern for access, as the contain web portal provides the necessary authentication. I have access to users passwords in PLAIN text

...here are copious assert() bits in there to catch it if the > compiler gets itself confused, so you should know sooner rather than > later if something goes wonky. > > -Jim > > On May 10, 2012, at 11:25 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > > > I hate to be bothersome, but can someone please comment on this? > > > > Thanks again, > > Hal > > > > On Thu, 3 May 2012 14:49:04 -0500 > > Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > > > >> Hello, > >> > >> The current code in PPCTargetLowering:...

...w hook in order to circumvent the const issue. This works but bothers me a little since it's a lot of hoop-jumping just to bypass const. Which of the above, or any other possibilities, would you consider to be the best approach? (While I'm on the topic of this function, it's a little bothersome that the MachineFunction &MF parameter is marked const also. It makes it impossible to call MF.getFrameInfo() without casting the constness away. In such cases, is it best to cast away const, or remove the qualifier from the parameter?) Thanks for any help! Bill -- Bill Schmidt, Ph.D. IBM Ad...