search for: bosh

How do I make a user dial a passcode if he wants to make an international call? ________________________________ This electronic message contains information from BOSH Global Services which may be company sensitive, proprietary, privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. The information is intended to be used solely by the recipient(s) named above. If you are not an intended recipient, be aware that any review, disclosure, copying, distribution or use of...

How do I make a user dial a passcode to make calls through asterisk? We would like to place a phone at a client's location for our employee but are afraid it may get abused by the other workers. ________________________________ This electronic message contains information from BOSH Global Services which may be company sensitive, proprietary, privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. The information is intended to be used solely by the recipient(s) named above. If you are not an intended recipient, be aware that any review, disclosure, copying, distribution or use of...

<m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > Ah. I don't remember if I was using csh, or ksh, and didn't realize about > bash. I *think* I vaguely remember that sh seemed to be more capable than > I remembered. If you like to check what the Bourne Shell did support in the late 1980s, I recommend you to fetch recent Schily tools from:

Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: > > The schily tools act as a container to publish the current code state. There is > > no such maintained web page. > > I was referring to the summary on the SourceForge page, where you just list the contents of the package without explaining why one would want to download it. I thought I don't need to make advertizing for

...code also allows all the modifications to be disabled via #ifdef's. This happens with "osh". My code is actively maintained and fixed _all_ documented historic bugs, see: http://www.in-ulm.de/~mascheck/bourne/ > I see that you already wrote up the differences between osh and bosh in an earlier post. Is there a good reason why these comparisons are not on the Schily Tools web page already? :) The schily tools act as a container to publish the current code state. There is no such maintained web page. Given the fact that Sven Maschek wrote down a lot, it seems the informat...

...wrote: > > This is the SVr4 Bourne Shell, so you need to take into account what has been > added with Svr4: Is there any difference between your osh and the Heirloom Bourne Shell? http://heirloom.sourceforge.net/sh.html I see that you already wrote up the differences between osh and bosh in an earlier post. Is there a good reason why these comparisons are not on the Schily Tools web page already? :)

...us.fraunhofer.de> wrote: > > Heirloom added support for uname -S and for some linux ulimit extensions but > then stopped working on the code after a few months Ah. I had no idea it was in a state of disrepair. >> I see that you already wrote up the differences between osh and bosh in an earlier post. Is there a good reason why these comparisons are not on the Schily Tools web page already? :) > > The schily tools act as a container to publish the current code state. There is > no such maintained web page. I was referring to the summary on the SourceForge page, w...

...chily tools to show people how the first shell with an > interactive editable history did look like. Bsh != Bourne Shell. Yes, I realize that osh is closer to the original Bourne shell. My point is that you can?t expect people to just know, without having been told, why they want bsh, or osh, bosh, or smake, or? Most of these tools compete with tools that are already in CentOS. If you want people to use these instead, you?re not going to persuade many people with a tarball. As for the tools that do not have equivalents in CentOS, the file name is not an explanation. You can?t expect peop...

On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 08:32:45AM -0400, Scott Robbins wrote: > Wasn't Solaris, which for awhile at least, was probably the most popular > Unix, using ksh by default? Solaris /bin/sh was a real real dumb version of the bourne shell. Solaris included /bin/ksh as part of the core distribution (ksh88 was a part of the SVr4 specification) and so many scripts were written with #!/bin/ksh at

Hey folks, I'm reading up on gtar for tape archiving and it sounds kind of nasty and not something I really want to rely on. It looks like star from the schily tools is preferred. I'm using Centos (and RHEL) 5.7 which seems to have star but not sdd. Which leads me to believe that the Schily tools are maybe a bit "rogue" My basic requirement with what I'm doing is to use