Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "borrame".
Did you mean:
borrado
2020 Aug 24
2
smbclient mask command seems not to work the same way with recurse ON for mget and mput
...Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.7 (Maipo)
[root at vnhprerhds01 ~]# smbclient -V
Version 4.9.1
[root at vnhprerhds01 ~]# smbclient -W "${d}" -U "${u}" "${s}" "${p}"
Try "help" to get a list of possible commands.
smb: \> !mkdir -p /tmp/borrame/a
smb: \> !mkdir -p /tmp/borrame/b
smb: \> !touch /tmp/borrame/a/AM.xls
smb: \> !touch /tmp/borrame/a/AT.xls
smb: \> !touch /tmp/borrame/b/BT.xls
smb: \> lcd /tmp/borrame
smb: \> cd borrar
smb: \borrar\> recurse
smb: \borrar\> prompt
smb: \borrar\> mask *M.xls
smb: \borra...
2020 Aug 24
0
smbclient mask command seems not to work the same way with recurse ON for mget and mput
...er release 7.7 (Maipo)
> [root at vnhprerhds01 ~]# smbclient -V
> Version 4.9.1
>
> [root at vnhprerhds01 ~]# smbclient -W "${d}" -U "${u}" "${s}" "${p}"
> Try "help" to get a list of possible commands.
> smb: \> !mkdir -p /tmp/borrame/a
> smb: \> !mkdir -p /tmp/borrame/b
> smb: \> !touch /tmp/borrame/a/AM.xls
> smb: \> !touch /tmp/borrame/a/AT.xls
> smb: \> !touch /tmp/borrame/b/BT.xls
> smb: \> lcd /tmp/borrame
> smb: \> cd borrar
> smb: \borrar\> recurse
> smb: \borrar\> prompt
&...
2020 Aug 24
2
smbclient mask command seems not to work the same way with recurse ON for mget and mput
...gt; [root at vnhprerhds01 ~]# smbclient -V
> > Version 4.9.1
> >
> > [root at vnhprerhds01 ~]# smbclient -W "${d}" -U "${u}" "${s}" "${p}"
> > Try "help" to get a list of possible commands.
> > smb: \> !mkdir -p /tmp/borrame/a
> > smb: \> !mkdir -p /tmp/borrame/b
> > smb: \> !touch /tmp/borrame/a/AM.xls
> > smb: \> !touch /tmp/borrame/a/AT.xls
> > smb: \> !touch /tmp/borrame/b/BT.xls
> > smb: \> lcd /tmp/borrame
> > smb: \> cd borrar
> > smb: \borrar\> recu...
2020 Aug 24
4
smbclient mask command seems not to work the same way with recurse ON for mget and mput
A new update. Same behaviour with 4.6.16. Exact issue as Bug 1249.
Many thanks. Kind regards.
El lun., 24 ago. 2020 a las 12:23, LPC DPG (<lpcdpg at gmail.com>) escribi?:
> Dear folks.
>
> Was hoping it had to do with the release, but have also tested in 4.4.16
> and the issue is also there. I am aware a RHEL/CEntOS based upon 6
> distribution is not the most up to date