search for: bootstapping

Current llvm/clang/compiler-rt/polly/testsuite/libcxx from 3.4 branch is broken during the bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin12 against Xcode 5's clang with the failure... [ 54%] [ 54%] Building CXX object lib/Analysis/CMakeFiles/LLVMAnalysis.dir/AliasAnalysisCounter.cpp.o Building CXX object lib/ExecutionEngine/CMakeFiles/LLVMExecutionEngine.dir/ExecutionEngine.cpp.o

Hi, I am trying to get bootstrap confidence intervals on variance components and related statistics. To calculate the variance components I use the package lme4. > off.fun <- function(data, i){ d <- data[i,] lme1<- lmer(y ~ trt + (trt-1|group), d) VarCorr(lme1)@reSumry$group[2,1] #just as an example } > off.boot <- boot(data=data.sim, statistic=off.fun, R=100) If

dear group members, I am looking for a function that assess the stability of cluster. The result of hclust function is an hclust object which can be plot as a dendrogram. However to have confidence in the tree topology usualy bootstap is applied. I understand that I can apply bootstarp on the original data and then run hclust(dist() ) as much as I resampled but how to comapre the topologies the I

On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 08:08:56 -0700 Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com> wrote: > FWIW, I agree that the current situation with llvm-gcc is not ideal, but > most of us just build llvm-gcc once and forget about it. The real > solution here is to endow LLVM with its own C/C++ compiler and bootstap, > but that's a longer strategy. > > Reid. While I agree this would be the

John, The point I was trying to make (and obviously didn't) was that because automake can make the mechanics of building/testing/packaging a release so much easier (one command), it is possible for this to be automated regularly (e.g. nightly test). Consequently, the problems only seen when building a distribution would be available much sooner than the week before the release. Distribution

On Tue, 12 Oct 2004, Jeff Cohen wrote: > On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 08:08:56 -0700 > Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com> wrote: > > > FWIW, I agree that the current situation with llvm-gcc is not ideal, but > > most of us just build llvm-gcc once and forget about it. The real > > solution here is to endow LLVM with its own C/C++ compiler and bootstap, > > but

Dear mailing list, I tried to run the example for the conditional bootstap written in the help file of censboot. I got the following result: STRATIFIED CONDITIONAL BOOTSTRAP FOR CENSORED DATA Call: censboot(data = aml, statistic = aml.fun, R = 499, F.surv = aml.s1, G.surv = aml.s2, strata = aml$group, sim = "cond") Bootstrap Statistics : original bias std. error t1*

Hello there I have the following model based on the hollings disc equation for the type II functional response for 2 data sets: nls(eaten~(a*suppl)/(1+a*h*suppl) where eaten is the number of prey eaten by a predator and suppl is the number of prey initially supplied to the same predator. I have parameter estimates of 'a' and 'h' for the two populations studied and would like

On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 5:13 PM, "C. Bergström" <cbergstrom at pathscale.com>wrote: > On 10/29/13 07:01 AM, Richard Smith wrote: > >> >> [As an aside: I use libc++ for my Clang development (on Ubuntu Linux), >> and it works for me (tm). This is with libstdc++ providing the ABI pieces, >> rather than libc++abi or libcxxrt, though.] >> > libc++

I would appreciate some thoughts on using the bootstrap functions in the library "bootstrap" to estimate confidence intervals of ICC values calculated in lme. In lme, the ICC is calculated as tau/(tau+sigma-squared). So, for instance the ICC in the following example is 0.116: > tmod<-lme(CINISMO~1,random=~1|IDGRUP,data=TDAT) > VarCorr(tmod) IDGRUP = pdLogChol(1)

On 10/29/13 07:01 AM, Richard Smith wrote: > > [As an aside: I use libc++ for my Clang development (on Ubuntu Linux), > and it works for me (tm). This is with libstdc++ providing the ABI > pieces, rather than libc++abi or libcxxrt, though.] libc++ "works" for us as well, but it can't self host. I don't know if your "works" and my definition of works is

On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Richard Smith <richard at metafoo.co.uk>wrote: > On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 5:13 PM, "C. Bergström" <cbergstrom at pathscale.com>wrote: > >> On 10/29/13 07:01 AM, Richard Smith wrote: >> >>> >>> [As an aside: I use libc++ for my Clang development (on Ubuntu Linux), >>> and it works for me (tm). This

I''m looking for a RoR VPS with mySQL, mongrel, apache, and possibly PHP. Westhost has some really darn nice pricing for VPS. Anyone have any opinions? I''m looking at something that will scale with our needs. Not necessarily the cheapest, but something with good value. However, we are in a bootstap situation. Thanks. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

To all I have some simple questions pertaining to weights used in regression. If the variability of the dependent variable (y) is a function of the magnitude of predictor variable (x), can the use of weights give an appropriate answer to the regression parameters and the std errors? Assume that y at x=1 and 6 has a standard deviation of 0.1 and at x=11 it is 0.4 Then according to a web page on

Buenos dias para todos, Estoy trabajando en una aplicación que involucra análisis de clusters. Básicamente el objetivo es determinar a qué cluster pertenece cada observación de una matriz de datos "mydata" y luego generar muestras aleatorias de los mismos datos para determinar la proporción de veces que cada observación es clasificada en el cluster k. Este tipo de análisis es muy común

Reid Spencer wrote: > On Sun, 2004-10-10, Misha Brukman asked "Why can't we use wildcards > instead of listing all the sources" and then wrote in response to my > reply: > >>On Sun, Oct 10, 2004 at 04:40:48PM -0700, Reid Spencer wrote: >> >>>http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/manual/html_mono/automake.html#wildcards >>> >>>is your

On Sun, 2004-10-10, Misha Brukman asked "Why can't we use wildcards instead of listing all the sources" and then wrote in response to my reply: > On Sun, Oct 10, 2004 at 04:40:48PM -0700, Reid Spencer wrote: > > http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/manual/html_mono/automake.html#wildcards > > > > is your answer. > > I think their "answer" is

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1272 ------- Comment #9 from dtucker at zip.com.au 2007-02-19 23:22 ------- Another thought: do you have multiple instances of libgcc? Perhaps one in /usr/local/lib and one elsewhere? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.